Saturday, 8 June 2024

Better Buses Battle for Bedford and x Nationwide

From: Saragh Fleckney <Saragh.Fleckney@bedford.gov.uk>

Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 at 13:16
Subject: FW: Action required - Comment - 01271 - PB

Bedford BC - OFFICIAL-Secure

 

Good morning, Mr Pill,

 

Thank you for your email.

 

Please accept my apology for the delay in replying.

 

Please find below, responses to your points raised.

 

  • The bus stop timetable in St Cuthberts Street (outside what was The Merton Centre) is dated 2023. Is that still relevant or has Number 7 changed?

A – The timetable dates June 2023 is the most recent timetables for the number 7 service.

  • I wish you would all collaborate to ensure non digital audiences x however informed, have readable (font size) access to comprehensive timetable information. So, stops seem better than others.

A – We have working with our operators and neighbouring authorities to updates all the roadside publicity. Bus companies can amend their timetables several times a year, so these are updating on a rolling basis, as and when these changes take place.

  • Borough Timetables are best with all times of buses sequential on one timetable poster, not segmentalism.

A – Roadside publicity is generated from the individual bus services registrations. Therefore, it is not possible to merge these into a time sequential format, I’m afraid.

  • Has the 10.02 Uno service on Sundays been reinstated?

A – Please can you specify the location in which you are referring to the 10:02 service?

  • On St Cuthberts, No. 7 is hourly on Sundays, so knowing if and how long to wait really matters. Thanks for all you do.

A – Thank you for compliment. If we can be of any further assistance, please contact my team on Bus.info@bedford.gov.uk

  • On No. 8 extension to the South Wing Hospital, laudable if only the same bus wrapped round Bedford Midland from Winifred Road and Ashburnham Road en route back and people encouraged to ride round. Ideally the bus would stop Kempston Road (no crossing Britannia Road) and go via Spring Road Kempston to loop back via Ampthill Road –

A - Thank you for your suggestion. The service 8 is a commercial route that is operated by Stagecoach therefore we have no governance over how the service operates. However, will pass your comments on to Stagecoach for their consideration.

  • Morrisons has had a reduced service with No. 2 cut.

A – Yes, Stagecoach decided to de-register the number 2 service as it was no longer commercially viable for them to run. Unfortunately, this has reduced the number of bus services currently serving Morrisons on Ampthill Road.

  • On the whole, buses are okay and yet, I do wish some gaps like Tavistock Street, High Street, Bedford Midland Rail Station and so forth, were better served or as in Tavistock Street, are not served at all, surely one of the many buses which ply Union Street could do it, wrapping around back to Hassett Street via The Broadway?

A – The decision as to whether to serve these locations would a commercially decision by the operators. However, Stagecoach are currently looking at their town network and conducting some travel pattern modelling so I will pass this information on to them for them to investigate further.

  • Now 906 is just a normal bus and not a coach, could reinstatement of picking up St Peters Street (Eagle/Quarry side/outwards) be reinstated as per that of the Rugby Ground?

A – Again, this would be a commercial decision of the operators. So, I will pass your comments on to them for hem to investigate further.  

  • Likewise, X5 Bedford-Oxford, to serve (outward) a new stop on the corner of Biddenham Gold Lane, to save expanded residents, having to come into Bedford and out again, meaning driving is the best option for many?

A – the X5 service used to stop on Bromham Road, many years ago, but Stagecoach decided to cease this. I will raise this with them again for their consideration.

 

Lack of any shop for Biddenham when so much expansion of housing is taking place, seems again, detrimental, as the nearest supermarket is again in town or A6/Bypass Corner about 1-2 miles northwards? Is this a design oversight, not even a garage with a modest food hall and toilet access for example? People having to drive in the absence of 'the local'?

 

A - The Council recognises the importance to communities of local shopping facilities which provide for people’s day-to-day needs. Through our local plans the Council promotes the retention and development of local shops in local centres and villages. Where places are not well served by local shops the Council will look for opportunities by encouraging a developer to provide new facilities as part of their developments. However commercial realities are such that a developer will not build a shop unit that it cannot let on the commercial market because it does not have a large enough catchment to make it financially viable. It is unfortunately the case that Biddenham is just too close (by car) to a good range of shops to make it likely that one could be successfully established in the village. Nevertheless, if a site were to become available and someone did want to open a shop in the village, the Council would not be opposed to such a development in principle subject to their not being any disturbance to neighbours.

 

Many Thanks

Saragh

 

Saragh Fleckney

Manager for Passenger Transport and Sustainable Travel

Bedford Borough Council

Barkers Lane Depot

121 Barkers Lane

Bedford

MK42 9AP

01234 228122 (ext. 42122)

Mobile: 07823 363125

Web www.bedford.gov.uk

 

 

From: Richard Pill <rich906pill@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2024 12:53 PM
Subject: [External] Bus Stop Updates and Feedback

 

Attention: This email originated from outside of Bedford Borough Council. Please be extra vigilant when opening attachments or clicking links.

Dear All,

The bus stop timetable in St Cuthberts Street (outside what was The Merton Centre) is dated 2023. Is that still relevant or has Number 7 changed?

I wish you would all collaborate to ensure non digital audiences x however informed, have readable (font size) access to comprehensive timetable information. So stops seem better than others.

Borough Timetables are best with all times of buses sequential on one timetable poster, not segmentalism. Has the 10.02 Uno service on Sundays been reinstated? On St Cuthberts, No. 7 is hourly on Sundays, so knowing if and how long to wait really matters. Thanks for all you do.

On No. 8 extension to the South Wing Hospital, laudable if only the same bus wrapped round Bedford Midland from Winifred Road and Ashburnham Road en route back and people encouraged to ride round. Ideally the bus would stop Kempston Road (no crossing Britannia Road) and go via Spring Road Kempston to loop back via Ampthill Road - Morrisons has had a reduced service with No. 2 cut.

On the whole, buses are okay and yet, I do wish some gaps like Tavistock Street, High Street, Bedford Midland Rail Station and so forth, were better served or as in Tavistock Street, are not served at all, surely one of the many buses which ply Union Street could do it, wrapping around back to Hassett Street via The Broadway?

Now 906 is just a normal bus and not a coach, could reinstatement of picking up St Peters Street (Eagle/Quarry side/outwards) be reinstated as per that of the Rugby Ground?

Likewise, X5 Bedford-Oxford, to serve (outward) a new stop on the corner of Biddenham Gold Lane, to save expanded residents, having to come into Bedford and out again, meaning driving is the best option for many?

Lack of any shop for Biddenham when so much expansion of housing is taking place, seems again, detrimental, as the nearest supermarket is again in town or A6/Bypass Corner about 1-2 miles northwards? Is this a design oversight, not even a garage with a modest food hall and toilet access for example? People having to drive in the absence of 'the local'?

Hope this is useful feedback respectively.

Not complaining, just thinking aloud for audits and hands-on better use of what we have available.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

Richard Pill

~ a regular bus user and observer. ~

cc. BRTA Bedford Forum


I forward an email I received from Bedford Borough Council regarding local buses, access and plethora other matters, by no means exhaustive! I did ask for permission to share. I do consider them to be in the public interest as per the letter attached from DFT.

On a more positive note, Wixams Station is slowly moving towards being a reality, at the foothills at least we hope! re: https://www.bedfordindependent.co.uk/wixams-station-on-track-says-senior-officer-at-bedford-borough-council/

Our goals are:
1. Affordability. A family of four visiting Milton Keynes for example from Bedford at £2 each, would be £16 return before one has spent anything. It goes against those on or below £20, 000 p.a. to £zero / Welfare and millions in between. These brackets struggle with the cost and maintenance of a car and free access to buses could inform a. daily needs more met and b. change over for spending on essentials like food, energy bills and other essentials more.
2. Is it fair for retired people to get a free bus pass when 18+ to retirement people have to pay? Not to begrudge elderly their pass, but if extended it could mean:
a. people can vote with their feet more on bus usage
b. likely more bus usage, so shutting down in stats is harder to justify.
c. Greener environmental transport usage by people means less traffic and congestion/parking demand, lowers emissions and give people more modal shift choices.
There may be other aspects, please feed back.
We have to consider whether the £2 gimmick saves government money than a 18+ standard 'open to all' free bus pass and even over £20, 000 p.a. should be able to reasonable cost buy an annual bus pass, to save them costs and give more options.
I do not understand why Bedford has a lack-lustre bus linkage day time with the main Bedford Midland Railway Station as part of all buses overall journeys when places like Spalding, Hastings, Horsham and Milton Keynes and elsewhere integrate much more and pull it off some how whether commercial or not? I was told pre-pandemic 9000 people pass through Bedford Midland Railway Station per day, so 10% of that to buses, would be a boost and more than cover costs surely?
Local government struggles with costs and is threadbare, I understand that, but so are other places which still see the link between bus station and main railway station as a pize worth seeking. It would be good to have this looked at and championed by pro-green councillors objectively. Chicken and egg, whereby if you do not lay on regular buses, you can only drive, walk and cycle or taxi, if you do lay on people, what incentive to wait and use? Plusbus was a scheme to integrate ticketing, and Season Ticket Holders may well have bus access included for example? So leisure line users, visitors and ad hoc travelling, could benefit from more and better bus integration with Bedford Midland Railway Station. If and when East-West Rail and other major developments land here in Bedford, what will they find? It gives timescale for heads to think, study and find solutions to the problem, which until 1980's privatisation, was not an issue for local buses to serve - 108 to Clapham I believe for example served the station, now just a bi-hourly frequency on a 15-20 minute walk through an estate to the main bus station in Greyfriars and back. I welcome feedback, thoughts or whatever as to how we might take these issues forward, certainly will table it for our next Bedford Forum - see: https://ertarail.co.uk/events/

Yours sincerely,


Richard Pill
BRTA CEO
Ps. If anyone wishes to see original emails, please send requests via richard.erta@gmail.com




Monday, 3 June 2024

Rail Links East of Bedford, UK

The British Regional Transport Association (BRTA) has often stated we want 'east of Bedford via the St John's area' and for good reasons. 1 It declutters an already busy Midland Railway Station area and 2. enables more by rail, which cuts overall gridlock congestion more.

We are for an east-west railway and indeed, in more than one location. Majority of rail groups apparently, want the Northern Route E option. Indeed, some at Willington object to our route because they live there and say our route has been "rejected many times" when in 2019 consultation was not even included in the options put before the public! Level crossings are cited, when lobbying the Office for Road and Rail (ORR) and other tiers of government and agencies can actually solicit special dispensations in circumstances where alternatives like at Priory Park entrance would be unworkable due to the New Cut River stream for example.

It is our view, that if East-West Rail goes north of Bedford, then an additional two tracks with demolition of houses would have to be done, as modal shift to rail means more rails and trains to service it. We are concerned at steep gradients via the northern route, especially if freight is involved. However, we are being bullied and isolated by other rail groups as their take is they know better and majority rules the roost!

If objectors to Northern Route East-West Rail were to join BRTA, come to our forums and help us promote our alternative route, which has much to commend it and was supported by Richard Fuller MP when he was MP for Bedford, with Network Rail and Railfuture, then the matter would just need the Council to support it along with any MP or candidates across the political spectrum. Alas, the devil is in the detail and if East-West Rail Company said they needed 6-tracks north of Bedford, our politicians need to accept that and either accept that route or reject it putting our call in its place. Fence sitting and much ado, means no rail link resolution, dithering and compounding congestion, air pollution and gridlocked future as development happens and all goes by road across the regions the railway would serve.


Monday, 27 May 2024

Essential Reading to be equipped for deficit infrastructure agendas

re: https://nic.org.uk/studies-reports/infrastructure-progress-review-2024/

This report shows a shortfall in transport infrastructure spending and we should take note that across the board infrastructure is coming up the agenda of what is fundamental to civilised existence (water for example) but environmentally, land use wise and that of cutting emissions, it is more and better rail infrastructure where the deficit is felt. Modal shift in many cases cannot happen without reopening programmes of real local lines and associated infrastructure projects to enable small to large modal shift transfer of freight and people travel patterns from road to rail. 

In Bedford, it is East-West Rail which dominates, but is sluggish in progress regarding accessing Bedford and notions of rails to the East which needs proper leadership with a discernment and based on sound local knowledge.
BRTA has said what it feels is best, we have offered to look at maps of Bedford Midland layout and discuss what could be rearranged to enable a twin bay additional infrastructure for Oxford-Cambridge passenger operations and two twin track access to existing Midland Main Line slows for freight. Ford End Road Bridge may be listed, but is a problem for enabling optimum rail redesign and 8 coach platforms for example. In our view, the station booking hall should go back to the old station site, looking down Midland Road towards the town centre, not an urban Parkway design, in the middle facing a housing estate! Likewise, we want attention for Stations North of Bedford, and a way forward may be to direct Thameslink trains to serve Corby and focus EMR trains on a seamless Bedford-Leicester electric fast and slow service, windowing reopening of local stations and a shuttle to link into principal main line stations feeding to and from accordingly. Should one have 2-3 changes to get to Sheffield or Leeds from the Midland Main Line? We don't think that is optimising infrastructure!

So, we keep on, and lack of like the Northampton-Market Harborough deficit, should be being led on by paid, professional agencies and lead organisations from councils to government, with public input on how it may work, not NIMBYISM verus dire need. The stalemate cannot go on. So, head-in-sand is to reject local rail solutions like East-West Rail, but it has been handled badly, too remotely and East of Bedford via St John's should be the prescription with councils and leaders all on board. Get to link with ECML at Tempsford area first, then yes, the new ECML-Cambridge alignment, due to extensive blockages of the old varsity route from Sandy to Trumpington, is the way it has to be. The roads are being dualled, development is happening, so prudence calls for rail alternatives surely? That is where, of whatever shade, a new government will need to make a priority now, not 10 years time!

Please join BRTA and donate time and money to enable us to play a fuller role in these debates and movements for re-railing Britain.

Finally, the BRTA name has been accepted by the HSBC Bank, so make payments to that name now please. Likewise, our Corporate Membership is reduced to £50, so please affiliate/recommend us to others. We are also rolling out a Prize Draw, please make enquiries to David J. Start, our Treasurer to enter. 



Monday, 22 April 2024

BRTA calls on Councils and Public to back a better Rail Deal for Northamptonshire.

 Press Release 22-04-24:

BRTA calls on Councils and Public to back a better Rail Deal for Northamptonshire.

 

The British Regional Transport Association (BRTA) notified the West Northamptonshire Local Plan is now out for feedback, comment and consultation. See: West Northamptonshire Local Plan - 2041 (Regulation 18) Consultation Draft April 2024. Page 254

 

BRTA calls on the public to support its calls for the rail agenda to be made more ‘real.’ BRTA identifies 2 rail projects that should be given far more credence:

1.     Northampton to Bedford: Studies done 20 years ago showed a good case and demand, but were not acted upon and the route compromised. There was a common agreement of route protection between the councils, but this has not been maintained. Now a new route would be needed. But in favour of the rail connectivity and boost to local town centres this rail link offers are very real.

a.      Thameslink to Northampton and Rugby and vice versa

b.     Northampton to Bedford (35 minutes), Luton, x3 airports, Eurostar and the South Coast and vice versa.

c.      More people and goods by rail, reducing volumes on roads, cutting waste, pollution and enabling greater efficiency.

d.     Direct access and integrated services with East-West Rail (East) to/from Cambridge, East Anglia and Stansted Airport.

2.     Northampton-Market Harborough

a.                       Would be a missing piece of a more comprehensive rail network linking Leicester with Northampton, Milton Keynes and Oxford and vice versa.

b.                       Would bring more freight by rail to Northampton Depot, Daventry International Rail Freight Depot (DIRFT)

c.                        Would slash Northampton-Leicester journey times from about 90 minutes to a mere 35 minutes with additional Parkway Station.

d.                       A wider green corridor could enable both a twin track modern railway and a cycle-footpath albeit weaving where pinch-points may exist.

e.                       Study (2020) found good potential, but BRTA calls for full data to be released and both councils, government, and agencies like Midland Connect and England’s Economic Heartlands (EEH) to get behind it and lead on a timely delivery of at most 10 years’ time-frame. We need this rail link now!

 

End Press Release

 

Contacts: Richard Pill BRTA CEO 01234 330090 richard.erta@gmail.com or Professor Andrew N. Williams, T: 07923489254   E: anw@doctors.org.uk




Thursday, 18 April 2024

About Rail Central – Northampton’s newest rail development.

About Rail Central – Northampton’s newest rail development. (above shows new tracks).

 
Rail Central is an emerging plan for a new strategic rail freight interchange (SRFI) where the West Coast mainline meets the Northampton Loop Line to the south-west of Northampton.
It would see the creation of a UK leading logistics and distribution capability on a site between Milton Malsor and Blisworth.
The rationale for this site is driven entirely by its strategic location and direct connections to key rail and road networks – Rail Central would connect into the West Coast mainline and the Northampton Loop Line as well as into the A43 trunk route within approximately 2 miles of the M1 motorway.
In addition to supporting the national policy move for freight on rail and creating a world-class logistics and distribution facility in South Northamptonshire, Rail Central would:
·        Create circa 8,000 new jobs
·        Channel significant and long-term investment into South Northamptonshire
·        Attract businesses for which effective supply chain management is critical to competitiveness
·        Reduce overall CO2 emissions by shifting more freight from road to rail
·        Underpin Northamptonshire’s position as the UK hub for logistics and support local jobs and the county’s economy
http://railcentral.com/
 
Rail Central Consultation feedback – now logged (15 June 2018)
Alex Verbeek (Gazeley) Andrew Fisher (Ashfied Land). By Simon Barber T: 0208 940 4399  

E: simon4barber@gmail.com Ed. Rebuilding Northampton-Market Harborough rail link would complement this and Daventry International Rail Freight Terminal (DIRFT.

Tuesday, 16 April 2024

More dates for diaries and ammunition!

Some of you may find this article of interest and its source. Air pollution is damaging public health and well being and that costs the NHS as well as families of loved ones. Our rail proposals will help cut emissions and therefore are pro-life! 
Please have a read: 

Our Northampton to Market Harborough (N"MH) needs more team players like Northampton, Market Harborough and Leicester area reps to recruit new members and promote the idea of reopenings. If interested please forward enquiries to me: richard.erta@gmail.com

BRTA still has yet to get the name changed at the bank, not for want of trying, but they take ages. Please make donations payable to ERTA for now.

Our AGM - for your diaries - will be AGM and Public Meeting: Saturday, 13 July at The Court House, Church Lane, Berkhamsted HP4 2AX for 2-3pm AGM and 3-5pm business.

Phone: 01442-878227 https://www.stpetersberkhamsted.org.uk/courthouse/

12 Noon Wetherspoons, 13.00 Set Up. Guest Speaker: Karl Watts, a director at Railmotive Ltd. All welcome/admission free. Please bring cash with you to peruse our second-hand book and rail magazine stall, donate or join. Note: If you join as a new member on an old form, it will be honoured for the first year!

Other forums, if you wish to meet us or be out and about enjoying train travel are:

BRTA Summer ForumsWhere Executive Officers go to regions, we are not so active in and reach out to find new members and support for our local rail agendas. Join us and let us get networking together! This summer, we are calling at:

1.          Westbury - Saturday, 18 May at the Railway Inn, Station Road, Westbury BA13 4HW https://www.railwayinn-westbury.co.uk/ Phone: Karen Griggs (landlady)

01373-228109 (landline) 07402-322334(mobile)

2.           Shrewsbury - Saturday, 8 June at the Montgomery Tower,

Lower Claremont Bank, Shrewsbury, Salop. SY1 1RT https://www.jdwetherspoon.com/pubs/all-pubs/england/shropshire/montgomerys-tower-shrewsbury Phone: 01743-239080.

3.           Sheffield - Saturday, 29 June at the Benjamin Huntsman,

12-18 Cambridge Street, Sheffield, South Yorks. S1 4UD 

https://www.jdwetherspoon.com/pubs/all-pubs/england/south-yorkshire/the-benjamin-huntsman-sheffield Phone: 0114-263-9500.

Chief Executive Officers for these Summer Forums are Messrs Simon Barber and David Ferguson (see header): c/o T: 0208 940 4399

All meetings are 1pm food and 2pm onwards business. Check for details.

E: simon4barber@gmail.com People are responsible for their own food and drink and transport arrangements. Why not take a hotel or B&B and enjoy exploring a new area? If you want ‘more and better,’ be willing to enable that!

Horsham Public Meeting (see attached) - 27-04-24 - all welcome. Please help spread the word. If we hire a hall it incurs cost, so please give of your time and donate, bring cash and peruse our second hand magazines and books and/or renew your membership or maybe join for the first time. It is your association, we are only as good as a growing membership informs.

Friday, 5 April 2024

Government have created costly barriers to deter!

re: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crg66p74e62o

The demand by Government for feasibility studies upwards of £100, 000 to get started and demands for expensive and excruciating business cases at cost, delays, deters and defers all lay people and campaigners and unless someone somewhere, finds the money in a cost of living crisis and austerity, these projects never see the light of day.

We do need local rail solutions. We do need local rail reopenings as a catalyst to modal shift back from road to rail for more people and goods by rail, with multiple benefits like cutting congestion, freeing up parking spaces, cutting air pollution and improving and empowering the public with more choice, options and enablement.

So, what can give, what can take? We need a nationwide programme, region by region of local rail line reopenings. Devon has Bude, Tavistock, Bideford and Ilfracombe in the line-up, and Government, bearing in mind the savings of road wear and tear maintenance and greater efficiency of time-energy usage, let alone climate change issues, should be incentivising such local rail schemes and incentivising parcels companies like UPS, Royal Mail, FedEx, DPD, DHL to mention just a few - all need to be engaging with a nationwide switch policy and facilitation from road to rail, yet apart from the grand success of Varamis Rail: https://www.varamis.co.uk/ we are decades behind where we need to be in terms of infrastructure restoration, incentives, costs and enablement. Switching to rail means capital expenditure and the Government is treating it as a 'free market/laissez-faire' matter, not the public, environmental and general leadership matter. Would Opposition Parties be any better? Alas, from observing Labour responses to 'bads', that opposition is failing to show what it would do differently. To renationalise or not to renationalise and who pays, remain academic and media points of underlying debate, when like other aspects of life, we need bringing more to the forefront with 'this is what we will do...', rather than he said, she said and this is the result - chaos, mayhem, rising costs and barriers! 

Hope of interest. Our projects from a Northampton-Market Harborough rail link and that of Guildford-Horsham, along with Derby-Manchester via Matlock, Bakewell and Buxton/Chinley, need Government of any shade support and that absence and long-grassing into quangos who tell us PFI is the way to go (whenceforth does it come?), remains the 'devil in the detail' (Leviathan!)! We're going round and round, time is slipping by and resolution by default is roads and negativity, blight and unsustainable development without services and infrastructure.

BRTA, with your support, will continue to work to get progress, improvement and chip-by-chip keep all our wheels moving!




Here's possibly an example of where your money has gone?

Avanti Bosses: Hand back your taxpayer-funded bonuses 
To: Mark Harper, Secretary of State for Transport of the United Kingdom Andy Mellors, Managing Director at Avanti West Coast Petition text: Avanti West Coast managers have joked about receiving “free money” from the government and performance-related payments being “too good to be true”. They should hand back every penny in bonuses they have received at the taxpayers’ expense. Why is this important? Leaked slides from an internal Avanti West Coast presentation, whose services are notorious for disruption, delays, short-notice cancellations and overcrowding, show senior management at the operator calling taxpayer money “too good to be true”. Avanti is Britain’s worst performing rail company. Annual accounts show Graham Sutherland, the CEO of FirstGroup which owns Avanti, will be paid £1.1m including £682,000 in bonuses for 2023, while chief financial officer Ryan Mangold earned £3m, including £2.5m in bonuses. In 2022, Mr Mangold received £1.9m. Latest figures from the Office of Rail and Road statistics show Avanti cancelled 2,976 trains between April and November 2023, an average of more than 13 per day. Despite their poor performance, Avanti and Cross Country were rewarded with new long-term contracts by the Government in September. Not only are Avanti a poorly-run rail company, but they also find it funny to laugh at the daylight robbery they are getting away with. They should be made to pay back every penny in taxpayer-money they received as bonuses as punishment. https://act.38degrees.org.uk/act/avanti-bonuses