Monday, 21 September 2026

More Freight By Rail - government has a pivotal role!

 This article may also be of interest: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cw8r61n1z28jo

If we had Northampton-Market Harborough rebuilt: https://brtarail.com/n2mh/ Then Felixstowe to Northampton via Leicester and Peterborough would be possible and take on more, the A14-A45 corridor which even the BBC admit is 'congested'?! Cambridge-Bedford-Northampton is another way, but proceeding at a glacial pace. Reality is we need more rails for more trains now and switching requires investment and that question of where the money is coming from. Meanwhile, the Lower Thames Road Tunnels is to sink £11 billion whereas BRTA would have preferred a rail-based solution instead (Channel Tunnel-East Anglia and vice versa).

BRTA seeks to bridge these gaps in advocating more by rail in infrastructure terms, not necessarily new money, but values, priorities and putting people, places and the environment first at the heart of planning, policy and actions. Therefore tailoring development to allow recovery of former rail routes and new-build rail corridors is prudent and failure to do so, adds to cost and relocation aggro, which no-one wants, but is the inevitable conflict if protection is not done now. That does not mean fallow or dormancy, but ensuring clearances do enable a railway rebuild with electrification to be viable. It is currently in the balance on a nationwide scale with pushes to develop, afterthought about road impacts and rail alternatives. Contact ceo@brtarail.com

Thursday, 17 September 2026

BRTA Central Beds Forum - Dunstable calling!

 BRTA Forum at Dunstable: Wednesday, 7 October 2026 1pm lunch, 2-4pm business

01582-471452
(Guided busway at College Drive – then Court Drive)
Please see: https://brtarail.com/events/ for more information, but the agenda itself is self explanatory. It may be more people attend, so Simon will bring spare copies of the agenda and people can sit on different tables and follow it themselves at their own pace. Please come, all welcome. Sign the attendance list for future events and news.
Like so many disenfranchised locations, bereft of a basic rail link to the wider network and them to a location, Dunstable needs more substantive footfall, spend and regeneration with the rail infrastructure before any more spread? 
Please give us your support - join or affiliate to BRTA as an investment. 

BRTA Central Beds Forum (Dunstable) Wednesday, 7 October 2026 1pm lunch, 2-4pm business
The Gary Cooper, Grove Park, Court Drive, Dunstable, Bedfordshire LU5 4GP
01582-471452
(Guided busway at College Drive – then Court Drive)

Agenda:

1. Appointment of someone to chair the meeting

2. Some volunteer to take notes

3. Introduction to BRTA, attendance list and invite to consider joining

4. Apologies for absence

5. Dunstable needs re-railing! Over a 20-year time frame, planning, policy and relocation packages need to be nurtured to inform a new rail link between Luton and Dunstable. The busway would need relocation or abandonment, with more buses running on road spaces. The rail link could deliver hundreds of people per train to spend money in the town centre and give a quick rail-based access to the L&D Hospital, Luton Main Railway Station and maybe, a duck-under to join the slows integrated with Thameslink for Parkway Station (Airport) and onwards and vice versa to Dunstable. If you agree:

a. Join BRTA and encourage friends

b. Offer to help, CEO can assign roles – fund raising, campaigning, talking to politicians, convening meetings, coffee mornings and growing teams. You start today; your successors will reap the benefit!

6. Does Dunstable need a new north-south road bypass? Leaving via a new roundabout west of Dunstable Northern Bypass Roundabout with Watling Street, go into tunnels under the Chalk Hills to link with A5 Watling Street Redbourn Roundabout.

7. Common grounds: both 6 and 7 need studies to identify what needs doing, timescales of possible, costs and how that can move towards deliver medium to long term progressively. Currently the ideas need public support, get organised, be local led and campaign all the way to Government support and approval sooner than later.

8. Does Dunstable have safe cycling routes, enough pedestrian care facilities, toilets, cash point accesses and integration? Are local roads overloaded, what impact pollution from too much traffic? What of buses, cause and effect, under used or over used? Cuts and improvements, how do we strike the balance? What can be done?

9. Any Other Business

10.     Day, Date, Time and Place of next Central Beds Meeting – Sandy’s turn! Other date sees: https://brtarail.com/events/ We rotate Flitwick, Dunstable and Sandy (x3 per year). Does not stop others joining and facilitating more in their area themselves under the BRTA banner.

Notes: Everyone pays their own way. Please join our email free loop: ceo@brtarail.com


Tuesday, 15 September 2026

Oxford-Witney-Carterton, give it your support!

 Scroll up or down for best results, but here is the link: https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/26255160.hopes-witney-oxford-train-line-finished-2050/?cx_testId=4&cx_testVariant=cx_1&cx_artPos=7&ref=mostread_p_reco#cxrecs_s

This is fantastic news. 
Please email your local MP in support of it: https://members.parliament.uk/members/commons?sort=1 We all need to be vigilant and keep the pressure up. Lulls send signals of indifferent, pro-affirma support breeds more pro-affirma support - it is contagious either way!
We need the government to get behind it and switch funding from roads to rails more, beit cancelling the waste of £11 billion Lower Thames Road Tunnels and choose local rail alternatives instead. Oxford-Milton Keynes has been bandied about at £7 billion, some 40 miles of reconstruction, so Witney and Carterton should be a snip of it! It is about morals and priorities, rail creams off excess traffic loads like the A40 presents, it delivers sustainable footfall, spend and regeneration growth and give all ages and types, modal choices more than just endless development clogging up congested roads and car dependency lifestyles, which are unhealthy. 
Rail is good value for money and a nationwide government supported programme is just the ticket to keep Britain moving.
Email ceo@brtarail.com to join our free email loop for updates.

Thursday, 10 September 2026

Guildford to Horsham Rail Link via Cranleigh! Give it your support please.

 Basically I have told Simon to convene coffee meetings at Costa in Guildford and together for locals to grow a team to take it forward. I do the monthly on-line meeting and we welcome people to join and discuss G-C-H more. 

I am too remote and not resourced to attend the physical locality.
I welcome ideas on what needs doing to best rouse locals to join BRTA and get involved. 
The leaflet is our toe in the water. There more it can be done in Cranleigh, villages, Guildford and Horsham areas, the better, volunteers or lack of are a moot point.
New council for Surrey to be or not to be, we do need council support ideally.
MP support - if 5 people emailed her, it would mandate action apparently. She was based at the Uni up by the Cathedral, I wonder if she could get some students interested in lending a hand?
I have bcc'd our members, just in case others want to join-in too.
Heathrow expansion is back on the agenda and Southern Rail Link: https://heathrowrail.com/
linking Guildford, the reverse to Horsham via Cranleigh - if only we can get the promoters to think our way a bit more? 
Government is quiet about more rail infrastructure except a London centric plan of Elizabeth Line extension to Staines. Would the Windsor link be included I wonder? https://windsorlink.co.uk/video-master-plan/
Who gets there first wins, but the versatility of rails to be used by different trains should not be lost to us, ditto platforms and stations. We want Heathrow Link to extend to Old Oak Common (OOC) for link up and onwards via a tunnel to the Chiltern Main Line for Banbury and Aylesbury arcs to Guildford etc and Guildford to the east-west rail 'not via London'. It has been mentioned of a curve from east to north at Woking for South London/Waterloo operations to Heathrow as well. I have been told Guildford has capacity problems, our line gives more for more. 

Monday, 31 August 2026

Great Central Corridor re-rail with new-build?

Please support our call for a new-build of the former Great Central Corridor to a modern railway twin-track solution. Going from West London alongside HS2 north of Aylesbury to east of Brackley new-build and veering north to the north of Brackley and ending up at Leicester Central (new-build) via and serving Rugby, Magna Park, Lutterworth and giving congestion relief and emissions reduction to M1 and creating passenger and freight by rail capacity more. 

It needs investors and talent bringing together with the Government to take the project forward. Magna Park is one of the biggest industrial centres without a railway serving it in Europe! 
Join BRTA and vote with your feet and wallets. 
It is only pie-in-the-sky as long as people do nothing and the rot prevails! It would link with the Oxford-Cambridge East - West Rail and enable trains from Southampton and Wales and all in-between as well as via  a new railway serving Heathrow, link with Guildford and possibly the Channel Tunnel. It starts here!

Our events, including a Public Meeting in Leicester are on our website: https://brtarail.com/events/ and our Blogspot is via a click to: https://brtarailvolunteer.blogspot.com/
Please join in with us and be part of the picture!

When we talk of the Great Central and population spread, we in my opinion need to take into account the toll of two World Wars and the cull of men in particular to those generations. However, now the population has grown significantly in the 60 years since closure and we have a situation of pushes for development everywhere without new rail infrastructure. That means the impact will go on the roads, fuelling more roads and spiralling health related pollution issues. 
Moreover the following can also be observed:
1. WCML south of Rugby will still have increased passenger and freight demand regardless of HS2. 
2. M1 doesn't take much for 10 mile tailbacks, will only exacerbate.
3. Magna Park (one of the biggest industrial parks in Europe) and new-town expanded
Lutterworth are new markets not served by any railways.
4. Leicester is expanding and the Midland Main Line has many issues which need additional rail options for more by rail.
5. We are not suggesting religiously following every inch of course of old railway, rather the corridor needs re-railing in our view with a new-build interpretation to normal, conventional rail designs of say 125 mph for passenger and goods by rail more.
6. At the southern end you have Old Oak Common Interchange, East-West Rail (Oxford for Bristol, Southampton and South Wales corridors) and more options for Aylesbury.
7. Brackley is an expanding area, HS2 has been pushed through without any provision for a station, so a new line to the east with a Parkway Station (a bus link with Silverstone too) and heading north rather than HS2 North-West, would serve Woodford Halse, Willoughby, Southam/Daventry/A425 Corridor areas and a new South Rugby Parkway, new route to link with Leicester-Nuneaton and a new route to a new terminal station Leicester Central. 
At this stage we are calling for general support, protection of route corridor space and for a study to look at it as a contingency going forwards. Relocations, compulsory purchase with compensation all has to be considered through the normal processes. This is common to most reopening of closed lines or new-builds as corridors have not been protected despite future generations potentially needing the rail-based transport choices they can offer?
If we do not act, chained to history, we ignore the future. Whatever HS2 offers end-to-end, it leaves much undone interim and enjoys £1 billion per mile investment whilst austerity seems to be for other postcodes on a range of issues including reopening restored rail links to places like Bideford, Witney, Ripon, Cranleigh, Bridport, Ross-on-Wye, Coalville and Keswick for example).  
We need people to join BRTA and help us progress it more inch by inch to governmental support and ultimately adoption as they did with Greengauge. Investment in rail transport more, must be made nationwide, otherwise politics and postcode lotteries, mean comprehgensive rail choices are curtailed.

Please do this survey and remember to support BRTA and its projects: https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/BPFLGL/

Railfuture links from Stansted to Braintree and Colchester

 Please email lead people in favour of the new-build rail links and demand a study and protection of a route and junctioning access retention. 

All this development will impact the roads and pollution, whereas the new corridor rail link would help check and balance negative impact and inform more and better footfall and spend plus access from East Essex and Norwich lines to the Airport quicker than via Cambridge? 
I get the impression Railfuture is concentrated into the hands of too few people and in the name of East-West Rail, can put all manner of projects to sleep and one day we wake up and they are houses and no access or routes for any rail expansion whatsoever? Prove me wrong!
Lower Thames Road Tunnels are sinking £11 billion whereas a rail-based twin track tunnel in all probability would be cheaper, enable more for a wider spatial area and be clean-green transport for passenger and freight including acces direct from Colchester and Norwich to the Channel Tunnel.
People can email their MP's and demand rail solutions, not more roads, congestion and unsustainable development. Yes, people need homes, but new rail infrastructure helps absorb the impact more? Rail uses less land than new or expanded road systems too.

Friday, 28 August 2026

It is time to switch from roads to rails more!

 re: https://www.rha.uk.net/news/news/detail/congestion-costing-uk-30-8bn-a-year-roadbuilding-must-be-on-the-agenda

The RHA is right to identify the waste of £30 billion per year is costing at a time of record borrowing and finite resources, so cutting waste by chucking money at more roads which are known not to ease or rectify congestion, is the wrong answer. We need to see that the local rail closures have left a gap in our transport infrastructure, roads are locked-in and a major governmental courage and boldness to switch back to rail is a commitment we do need now!

The British Regional Transport Association (BRTA) has long supported a quick delivery of east-west rail links north of London.

We are sad it is proving so protracted and slow and lack-lustre in leadership, routes east of Bedford and seems disconnected to the prevailing tide of development which may obstruct any route between Bedford and Cambridge which is gateway to the rest of East Anglia  and vice versa to Bedford, connections and the Oxford corridor via Bletchley.

We believe the government, which has many demands, spiralling costs demands and so on, needs to get real as to what the foundational platform priorities should be. It needs to raise tax for the better off to pay for all the needs, but more critically, determine once and for all to go for a Renewables and Sustainable platform to inform development and growth balances with people, places, land use stewardship and critically the environment. Without these, hopeless iseems the landscape now and in the foreseeable future!

Government is wasting £11 billion on the Lower Thames Road Tunnels, whereas a rail-based alternative would be more useful for people and goods and for decluttering Essex and London.

We want a programme of local rail reopenings, new-build rail lines and existing line upgrades to enable more people and goods to use rail (modal choice) and declutter our expensive, polluting road systems.

Switch money from new roads to local rail links and people can vote more with their feet in their daily transport habits. Cutting emissions and rubber on hard surfaces helps reduce sicknesses from leukemia to cancer and lung issues for example, so that in turn saves money in the NHS for other deployments.

Blight of daily traffic and pollution informs a lot of mental health as well, so again the government could act in prevention terms, all saving money and lives and the rail agenda gives pro-affirma options.

Costs of usage need to come down, currently things are demand price-managed mainly and that is immoral as rich and poor, everyone needs transport for loads of daily needs.

Please email your MP and support BRTA!
and donate to BRTA: 

Here is a flavour of schemes which need a government push: https://brtarail.com/our-campaigns/

We are working hard, but need more practical support, donations of time and money and skills to take our agendas to policy and power corridors. Thank you.


Yours sincerely,

Richard Pill
BRTA CEO