Great Central Corrdior Re-Railing and Notes Agenda and Project - Investors welcome!

 a.                   GC Re-Rail Corridor Campaign. Needs investors of time and money and case making expertise as volunteers or court sponsorship via third party. Route protection, studying to make the case and we cap it as a main route and linkages to/from other rails for optimum market reach. So Guildford-Heathrow-Chiltern Main Lines, Aylesbury-Brackley East alongside HS2 corridor which assumes of GC trackbed, Brackley East Parkway (intercepts A43 and the Silverstone catchment) onwards to new Rugby Southern Parkway Station, on old route to serve Magna Park (biggest of its kind in Europe) and Lutterworth (growth area without rail access) and then onwards to a new reopened modern terminal based at Leicester Central (more capacity, footfall and spend across Leicester spread). Links would be Guildford (Brighton via the Cranleigh/Horsham Links), Gatwick, Heathrow, Old Oak Common (HS2 and West Country), East West Rail at north of Aylesbury to Oxford, Didcot, Reading, Southampton, Bristol and South West/South Wales and vice versa to GC corridor to link with Nuneaton-Leicester lines, Ivanhoe lines (possibly, needs a sturdy for Derby-Rugby corridor via Coalville), and terminating at Leicester Central. That is ample enough! Over a 20-year time frame, planning policies and actions can offer relocation packages to recover a route, put aside land for enabling a route based on incremental and ‘as-a-whole’ scheme to make a robust case, make capacity and enable more aggregately by rail. 2050 for all singing and dancing if corridor councils, government and agencies and public can buy into the idea and work together. Objections, NIMBYism and competing uses of the corridor (with some vested interests vying to oppose through business and other uses manipulations) all means a strong buy-in to re-railing is required. BRTA can plant ideas, but we need others to take it to the next stages. This strategy is agreed by BRTA. Simon to notify Councils and Voluntary Bureaus at Aylesbury, Rugby and Leicester of future forums and public meetings in good time i.e. minimum of 1 month notice before date of meeting. The longer the initiative is opposed, written off, shunned, abandoned, neglected, the harder, more costly and challenging incremental or whole-scheme delivery will ultimately be and this model of challenge repeats on a nationwide basis including Scotland and Wales!

https://brtarail.com/greatcentralcorridor/

If interested in joining our free loop please send to ceo@brtarail.com 

BRTA says it is time to "Bring Back our Tracks and Trains"!

Dear All,

The British Regional Transport Association (BRTA) is voluntary and belongs to all its members and a growing membership is exactly what we need to enable more and better along with reliable volunteering.

We want a government supported programme of local rail reopenings on a nationwide basis. This does not necessarily require new money, but a switch from spending £billions on new and upgraded roads, which is a hiding to nowhere. 

Rail offers more and lowers costs. Modal choice enables alternative transport to the cost of car and other vehicle dependency cultures. Walking, cycling, bus and in urban areas, Light Rapid Transit (LRT)/Trams in old words, can play a role in informing environmentally friendly modal shift from road to rail. The continent never got rid of their trams and they have a head-start in developing their networks. 

In Great Britain, the post-war closures robbed successive generations, places, communities, land use and the environment of genuine clean rail-based choices. Now demand for rail is up and the wanton failure to protect old railway routes, to fail to keep new-build corridors protected and have a programme for progressively re-railing urban, rural and inter-urban rails means locked-in roads-based agendas, polluting communities, informing bloated NHS waiting lists and getting ever slower as volumes of road-based operations grind to a halt. 

This is not growth or the best Great Britain can do; rather is lazy, lack-lustre and pandering to quick fixes, rather than doing the right thing. Pluralism x Pluralism = More Pluralism; knowing from historical roots of foundational infrastructure rectification systemic issues, enables a springboard to targetedly address key issues; noticeably here to “bring back out tracks and trains” Walking, cycling, and bus can do a role, but do not handle bulk people and goods on the same rail-based infrastructure. 

Seaside resorts need re-railing, to bring sustainable footfall and spend minus the land use parking demand intrusions. Likewise, as rail demand rises and routes become congested/overcrowded; duplicate routes are needed. One example is Gloucester – Hereford, which would link Reading and all points to Shrewsbury ‘not via Birmingham’ creating paths for existing lines to have more passenger and freight using them as well as serve the des-res tourist hotspot of Ross-on-Wye. 

BRTA is calling for a study to shore up credentials and route protection to keep options open. The government must not push down money to Local Levels as per cheese to a grater lost in pluralism agendas, rather, if money is delegated downwards, the government must specify and have a switch of agendas to local rail; the Climate Emergency, Public Health, Land use stewardship and the environment is crying out for that systemic change. It must be nationwide. Policy, Planning and agenda resourcing must reflect and rectify the deficit of rail.

BRTA can readily identify some examples, there’s probably more. The process was good with Restore Your Railway scheme, albeit grossly underfunded. The system is too long, complicated and expensive for lay people and complicated maths, deters both aspiration and bothering, leaving worthy potential to the winds of profit before people, laissez-faire and those who targetedly seem to hold a grudge against supporting, funding and work to achieve better rail outcomes.

Please help BRTA achieve its aims; the wellbeing of the nation desperately needs it!

Yours sincerely,

Richard Pill, BRTA CEO

ceo@brtarail.com

https://brtarailvolunteer.blogspot.com/ and https://brtarail.com/our-campaigns/ 

BRTA Essex Forum Minutes from Witham Saturday 7th November - Please join BRTA and get involved!

BRTA Essex Forum (Witham) Minutes held 7^th November at the Battesford Court Wetherspoons, Newland Street, Witham. Business started just after 2pm. ceo@brtarail.com

1.   Chairperson: Trevor Garrod

2.   Minutes: Richard Pill

3.   Apologies: Peter McBeath, Nathaniel Dodd, Jonathan Stock (Stansted Airport Public Affairs Manager), Alan Lyndsay (Essex CC Transportation Manager), Cllr Richard Minns of Kelvedon Parish, David J. Start, Cllr Ross Playle (Essex CC Witham Town).

4.   Stansted Airport Expansion: It was reported that “in June 2026, the Chairman of Railfuture East Anglia Branch (Ian Couzens) said support for Stansted-Braintree/Colchester through rail link would be a long-term matter.” However, it was also reported that the push of development for growth without regards to the corridor of land required for a new rail link, is being compromised and that however long-term the lack of advocacy and action by rail campaigners was, there is grave danger of a viable route being lost unless we can all persuade cooperation with local authorities to put the rail matter at the heart of their plans and ambitions. Otherwise, it all goes onto the roads and they are congested a lot of the time already.

Action: Richard to send Ian Couzens a copy of the minutes.

The East Anglia Railfuture Branch Meeting is 28^th November and someone may well raise the concern of East Anglia Railfuture Branch not doing anything on this rail corridor matter and its advocacy in the pro-affirma.

5.   Lower Thames River Crossing (£11 billion road-only tunnel currently). BRTA wants a rail-based solution, ideally heavy rail to enable London orbital of East Anglia-Kent-Channel Tunnel direct and vice versa for passenger and freight more by rail and relieve road and rail into and out of London. Alas, no rail inclusion of design or additional tunnel for a rail option. Richard could be introduced to Ken-Ex LRT Kent Ex-Tram link and Gordon Pratt in particular. Action:  Simon would contact him and invite him for comment.

6.   Tilbury Riverside Station and development around the area: Action: Simon and David Ferguson to visit the station and area and Simon would photograph it and the surrounds.

7.   Maldon Branch: a new rail link from the south needs studying to make the case and protecting the corridor must be factored into development designs to ensure a viable rail link can be reestablished. Maldon would also need a new station which could be a Parkway Station concept, offering parking and also incentives for walking, cycling and bus integration. It would connect with Woodham Ferrers on the Crouch Valley Line.

Action: Simon to email Cllr Lyndsay and ask whether any studies have been done and call for route evaluation and protection.

8.   East-West Rail: Trevor reported on Railfuture East Anglia’s attitude “Oxford-Milton Keynes a problem” and “blame it on the Unions” scapegotic rhetorics.

Action: Trevor would send a letter to the two Members of Parliament: Richard Fuller MP North East Bedfordshire, Mohammad Yasin MP for Bedford and Kempston and (possibly third) Blake Stephenson MP for Mid Bedfordshire (covers Marston Vale Railway). Their details can be found: https://members.parliament.uk/members/commons?sort=1 East-West Rail at end-to-end length stretches from Bristol-Oxford-Milton Keynes/Bletchley-Bedford-(new route) Cambridge for Ipswich/Norwich and possibly Stansted-Colchester/Braintree in Essex. Our focus is on pushing forward Bedford-Cambridge which has lack-lustre support amidst NIMBY, pro-road and other opposition. Action: Simon to ask Essex County Council if they are still interested in a Stansted-Braintree/Essex rail provision and what, if any actions might they take to keep it open as a viable option?

9.  Haverhill and Cambridge-Sudbury- Colchester?

We understand Railfuture East Anglia Branch is pursuing a Haverhill rail reopening, albeit may be a LRT scheme (or Guided Busway, which is popular in some quarters in Greater Cambridge areas). BRTA wants a full-blown rail recovery and through route, albeit Haverhill first and Phase 2 study, identifying a route and push through to the link at Sudbury.

Action: Can Railfuture please give us an update on what and who is on the case?

10.                    LT Central to Harlow extension: It was not considered viable, as most Harlow people want to go to London or Stansted which is quicker by conventional rail than a tube journey. Meanwhile Potters and rest of areas expands and all missing gaps means roads-only solutions.

11.                    Existing Public Transport Matters: There was no feedback.

12.                    AOB: Action: Simon to email Gordon Pratt. Include Ian Couzens and Trevor Garrod in it. Gordon could be invited to a London forum and given an introduction to his ideas for discussion. However, the BRTA view is heavy rail can do more on strategic national links like Lower Thames Crossing remains come what may. Like Heathrow, seems a missed opportunity and sends wrong messages concerning the environment.

13.                    Meeting closed approximately 16.00 BRTA may do another forum or meeting when local people join, want to get involved more and signs show a rail development growth opportunity is valued and being sought after by power. BRTA: Thanks to all who attended and/or sent apologies. https://brtarail.com/

The British Regional Transport Association (BRTA) is a voluntary membership based association: https://brtarail.com/become-a-member/

Our membership is open to all and we welcome people to join and help advocate for the causes we believe in. Principally, we want the following:

1. The government to restore the 'Restore Your Railway' fund and procedure to make local rail reopenings of local railways for passenger and possible freight, more amenable, do-able and help check and balance growing congestion, pollution from too much traffic, not enough rail choices and capacity issues on the network.

2. We want the government to inform a nationwide programme of local rail reopenings. The longer they postpone it and the switch of money from new roads to new local-based rail links, the better for the nation and us all. 

3. We are not asking for new money, we know it is tight, but a switch of government priorities which puts people, places, land use, the environment and modal choices to roads at the heart of governmental departments and tiers of governing and planning at all levels. The push for growth without protecting former routes and new routes is catastrophic as it locks in dysfunction, overcrowding and polluting congestion from day one. This must stop, we are not against growth, we want it on a sustainable platform.

In Essex, we wish for support for:

1. Extend the rail link into Stansted eastwards to link with Colchester and/or Braintree to reunited by rail east and west Essex. A new Parkway Station for Great Dunmow could be added. It would ease congestion on the A120 for example and boost existing public transport networks. Stansted is due to grow, but no requirement to invest in extending the railway nor protecting a corridor for a rail eastwards have been set aside amidst huge housing developments bereft of rail access.

2. The Lower Thames Crossing is £11 billion, at a time for many other calls, the government is saying £no money" including local rail reopening agendas. It will link Kent and Essex by road, we have called for it to be a rail-based provision instead, enabling more freight and passenger movements by rail, cutting congestion, pollution and waste. Norwich-Ipswich-Colchester-Chelmsford-Kent and the Channel Tunnel and vice versa sustainable visitorship, footfall and spend could be the real oyster of gain, instead areas will be blighted by congestion, delay and loss of open spaces.

3. A rail link to Maldon is tabled, but some believe an alternative route is possible. We wish to see a study on it and make the case to add to the list of nationwide local links by rail which could make a huge difference to inward footfall and spend to the resort, and easier commuting with less drive time going out.

Our agenda and details are attached and we clome your kind support. Other events appear on our events page on our website: https://brtarail.com/events/ Thank you. ceo@brtarail.com

Simon Barber: admin@brtarail.com 020-8940-4399 and 07522-374740
Notes: BRTA is only as good as a growing, contributory and reliable participatory membership informs – please join/donate today! https://brtarail.com/become-a-member/

~ Get Essex sustainably moving minus the emissions roads bring! ~

BRTA Press Release 28-10-2026 Northampton-Bedford today, nationwide policy tomorrow?!

 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

The British Regional Transport Association (BRTA) has welcomed confirmation from Network Rail that discussions, draft proposals and technical work relating to Northampton's future rail connectivity are currently underway as part of wider transport planning.

The confirmation came in response to a Freedom of Information request seeking information concerning potential rail links associated with the proposed Universal Studios UK Resort, East West Rail, Northampton Gateway and the former Northampton-Bedford railway corridor.

In its response, Network Rail stated:

"We hold some of the information you're looking for."

The organisation further confirmed that the request relates to:

"a variety of discussions, draft documents, proposals and other scheme information that are ongoing and which have a bearing on a larger piece of work still in progress."

Although the information has not been released at this stage, Network Rail stated that the material is being withheld because it relates to ongoing work and unfinished proposals.

BRTA Response

Richard Pill, Chief Executive of the British Regional Transport Association, said:

"This response confirms that discussions and technical assessments relevant to Northampton's rail future are taking place. While the documents have not yet been disclosed, it is important that Northampton remains fully represented as these discussions progress.

The proposed Universal Studios UK Resort presents a major opportunity for the wider region. Northampton is one of the largest towns in England and should be fully connected to the economic and transport benefits that emerge from future investment.

The BRTA believes there is a strong case for examining all opportunities to improve east-west connectivity, including proposals linked to East West Rail, Northampton Gateway and the reopening of the Northampton-Bedford railway corridor."

Importance for Northampton

Professor Andrew N. Williams said:

"This response demonstrates that discussions are taking place and that some technical work is underway. While the documents themselves have not been disclosed, it is encouraging that these issues remain under active consideration.

Northampton's residents, businesses and institutions will naturally wish to know whether the county's largest town is being fully integrated into planning for one of the most significant single economic developments in modern British history.

Unless there is bold action leading to significant investment in railway infrastructure serving Northampton, there is a real risk that the town could fail to secure its full share of the economic and transport benefits arising from the project.

The Government has recently committed £1.3 billion towards transport infrastructure associated with the Bedford area and the proposed Universal destination resort. To date, Northampton has seen no equivalent commitment despite its size, strategic location and economic importance.

For many years there have been growing concerns that Northampton has been overlooked in discussions about rail investment despite its strategic location, growing population and economic importance.

Northampton should not be an afterthought. It should be an active participant in conversations about the railway network of the future."

The BRTA is calling upon Network Rail, East West Rail, local authorities, Members of Parliament and central government to ensure Northampton's transport needs are fully considered as future rail investment proposals develop.

Improved rail connectivity has the potential to support economic growth, widen access to employment, reduce dependence on road transport and help ensure that Northamptonshire shares fully in the opportunities arising from major regional developments.

ENDS

Notes to Editors
Freedom of Information Reference: FOI202601914.
Request submitted to Network Rail on 28 September 2026.
The request concerned the proposed Universal Studios UK Resort, East West Rail, Northampton Gateway Strategic Rail Freight Interchange and the former Northampton-Bedford railway corridor.
Network Rail confirmed that it holds relevant information but declined disclosure under Regulation 12(4)(d) of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 because the material relates to ongoing work and unfinished proposals.
The British Regional Transport Association campaigns for improved regional rail connectivity and the reopening of strategically important railway routes.
Media Enquiries

British Regional Transport Association (BRTA)
 Email: Richard Pill ceo@brtarail.com and Professor Andrew N. Williams anw@doctors.org.uk 07923 489254

 Website: https://brtarail.com/b2n/

Blogspot: https://brtarailvolunteer.blogspot.com/   

Protecting former rail routes, studying credentials for reopening and not writing off, is essential for more rail-based modal chocies!

 The British Regional Transport Association (BRTA) sees and hears the cries of many commuters that it does not take much for the existing rail network across the South East to get overcrowded; one hitch can ripple across the network resulting in delays and cancellations.

With the push for growth through development, without more and better railway infrastructure, duplicate routes and indeed, new routes tapping into new flows and enabling quicker journeys; exacerbation of dysfunction in transport on and off the rails, is highly likely.

We are calling on Government to protect former rail routes to help keep reopening options open and study proposals to explore if there is in fact a case for reopening/new-build and pursue it in the name of modal choices, cutting road building blight and reducing congestion and harmful pollution.

On rail routes to Brighton; Lewes – Uckfield is one; but the push stops short of pursuit of reopening. On the matter of Shoreham-Horsham-Guildford for direct running to/from Reading and Heathrow; getting commitment to route protection and deviation lands as well as studies to make the case (BRTA is not resourced to do so); is what is required to optimise reasonable recovery. National Government has a pivotal role to play and people can email their local MP in support of the BRTA calls: https://members.parliament.uk/members/commons?sort=1

BRTA is voluntary and welcomes members of the public to join and offer to help as volunteers. We welcome all ages and backgrounds as long as people can be reliable, flexible and work with the grain of what we are seeking to achieve.

Please see our website for more: https://brtarail.com/

This is the time for action!

BRTA Update - going forward as a team

 Outlining key challenges - the model repeats. Mind the gap! Northampton faces disenfranchising unless a new rail link to Bedford gets government push, not indifference. Likewise, Bedford-Cambridge rail link, needs a new vote on routing, ours stands as the best. Northern Route unsatisfactory, bypassing Bedford southern route then has Universal blocking it and our route needs editing of 1000 houses at Willington to ensure a twin track railway with electrification can get through. These sorts of issues repeat, failure to protect rail routes and lack of government commitment to treating road and rail fairly; is the root of the problem.

1. BRTA Well Being: We face a mammoth task whilst larger groups like Railfuture and Campaign for Better Transport (CBT) seem to have lost their way somewhat. Laudable to be resourced to publish reports and call conferences, but unless the vital spade work of protecting routes is well peopled, organised and being done nationwide; the effort falls down.

BRTA is under-resourced. Our goals are clear:

a. push as much as we can for a nationwide government supported programme of local rail reopenings, select pieces of new-build and existing rail upgrades and capacity enhancements.

b. a programme of former rail routes, lands and especially where junctions existed, to be protected from non rail related intrusive development. We must have former rail routes and new proposed route corridors kept open for possible future reopening/rebuild. Failure to do that at least adds to cost and upheaval and closed down modal choices in a context of growth, development and exacerbates all the bads of road building agendas and their spin-off consequences and impacts.

2. In order to do that, we need a steady flow of people joining, donating and providing reliable volunteering on fronts we need filling and strengthening BRTA internally with reliable administration, ensuring the Executive Committee on and off line is quorum and ensuring the proper lead-management of the forums, which can play a role, but need proactive follow up, marketing and team building.

3. Update on Campaigns:

a. Great Central Corridor Old Oak Common to Leicester Central: Like all other reopening route options under attack and pressure. It needs a team loosely working together in a coordinated manner. Great need for it, HS2 is not a silver bullet and we ideally need both, and if you, like me, believe conventional rail is essential now, then join in with us to help progress our projects.

b. Gloucester-Ross-on-Wye-Hereford. We need local people to join, take a lead and help usher the feasibility study it needs, protect the remaining corridor and deviation spaces. 

c. Twin Track Rail Bridge across the Severn Estuary, much needed to give more capacity for more by rail. It needs someone to court council and other outlets to support and get a study done.

d. Guildford-Cranleigh-Horsham and Shoreham: West Sussex County Council admit it would be a god-send now, but in the name of encroachments are pursuing a policy of proliferated abandonment and blockages more! Such belligerent beggars belief when all they are doing is adding to congestion, new roads and traffic blight, when they say they want a better environment?! The project needs a team to work on progressing it.

As Campaigns Coordinator, I can give guidance, but I cannot pursue every campaign myself, sorry, but that is unrealistic.

4. Area Reps: You can do your own forums on and off line, recruit members, build a team, delegate down and advance the cordoned agendas as laid out on our website. You don't have to do it all, but doing something, liaising and sending up updates for dissemination, is the minimum we do need please. Everyone needs to be tolerant, able to forgive discrepancies and get on with the tasks set before us conjointly.

Area Reps are needed for North West, East Anglia, West Midlands, West Country (Wilts, Hants, Gloucestershire and Bristol area for example). 

We have 50 members, we need more like 500 members. We will do our bit; but must be a team effort. Organising any 5 people in any constituency to email their MP in support of BRTA is powerful, costs little time and yet if that model is repeated, turns interest more to us.

Thanks very much.

Yours sincerely,

Richard Pill

BRTA CEO

https://brtarail.com/our-campaigns/ and https://brtarail.com/events/

Re-Rail Dunstable! A commitment is needed.

https://brtarail.com/dunstable/

The British Regional Transport Association (BRTA) calls for support for re-railing #Dunstable! Much is against it on all sides and ways, but rail delivers footfall, spend and regeneration in its wake which few other options do. Dunstable is caught in a catch 22 whereby Central Bedfordshire Council is too spread out and under resourced to strum up such a vision, pluralism melts when singularity and focus demands dedicated commitment!

In a nut shell, it is a clear choice #Luton (separate Unitary Council) and Dunstable which they need to determine and decide on principally "Busway versus Railway" in modal choices, futures and directions. Busways are cheaper, but do not do bulk, rarely inform modal shift from cars to rubber wheeled buses and concrete renewal is an on-going cost, do bus revenues justify it? That leave Dunstable out on a limb from the rail network and 5 miles to the nearest rail station, is a set back to well-being in numerous ways to get out and go anywhere by rail beyond the mere locked-in 'locals' which buses only agendas inform sadly majoritively?

BRTA would welcome people to join, offer reliable voluntary services and help over a 20 year period nurture policy and practises which move Luton and Dunstable towards a shared rail link re-conversion and benefits shared. It needs a study on confirming the case, why and how and scoping for taking it forward to link Milton Keynes with Luton Parkway Railway Station. Integrated to Thameslink, it offers a bolt-hole off the Midland Main Line (MML) enabling more trains to serve and go through Luton Railway Stations.

Existing stone freight sidings at Luton could be relocated to a new freight servicing depot adjacent to the main line at Sundon, enabling a new 5 track, new under-arch at Hitchin Road Bridge and a duck-under to plough through existing Luton Interchange with a railway - bus shared land space with a new Luton Railway Booking Hall.

BRTA makes suggestions, plants ideas but a study can work up practicals and leaders must decide if the re-railing is a sense of direction our leaders at all levels wish to go over a 20 year plan, relocate, policy and development strategy? National Government has a role too and people can email their local MP's to call for support, research and working up tangible options to give the public a say, a choice and invest for the best outcomes. Contrast this to the staus quo languishing of the two town centres.

Likewise, with growth approved, £billions pour into the profits of London Luton Airport and associates, a portion of that money should be re-directed to invest in re-railing a new Luton-Dunstable-Milton Keynes rail link and an eastward extension via the #Knebworth area to link from the south to #Stevenage and enabling onwards to #Cambridge for excample. Not either Oxford-Bedford-Cambridge versus Milton Keynes-Dunstable-Luton and beyond, we need both, serving different markets, different populations, complementing each other and enabling more by rail, lowering congestion, pollution, ill-health and bringing tangible benefits on and off the rails.

Our diagrams are illustrative of a vision, they need working up to a specification; but our faith and what we hold out, is if taken up and progressed, everyone will benefit from local to regional and integrated to the national too! ceo@brtarail.com