Monday, 26 October 2026

Protecting former rail routes, studying credentials for reopening and not writing off, is essential for more rail-based modal chocies!

 The British Regional Transport Association (BRTA) sees and hears the cries of many commuters that it does not take much for the existing rail network across the South East to get overcrowded; one hitch can ripple across the network resulting in delays and cancellations.

With the push for growth through development, without more and better railway infrastructure, duplicate routes and indeed, new routes tapping into new flows and enabling quicker journeys; exacerbation of dysfunction in transport on and off the rails, is highly likely.

We are calling on Government to protect former rail routes to help keep reopening options open and study proposals to explore if there is in fact a case for reopening/new-build and pursue it in the name of modal choices, cutting road building blight and reducing congestion and harmful pollution.

On rail routes to Brighton; Lewes – Uckfield is one; but the push stops short of pursuit of reopening. On the matter of Shoreham-Horsham-Guildford for direct running to/from Reading and Heathrow; getting commitment to route protection and deviation lands as well as studies to make the case (BRTA is not resourced to do so); is what is required to optimise reasonable recovery. National Government has a pivotal role to play and people can email their local MP in support of the BRTA calls: https://members.parliament.uk/members/commons?sort=1

BRTA is voluntary and welcomes members of the public to join and offer to help as volunteers. We welcome all ages and backgrounds as long as people can be reliable, flexible and work with the grain of what we are seeking to achieve.

Please see our website for more: https://brtarail.com/

This is the time for action!



Sunday, 25 October 2026

BRTA Update - going forward as a team

 Outlining key challenges - the model repeats. Mind the gap! Northampton faces disenfranchising unless a new rail link to Bedford gets government push, not indifference. Likewise, Bedford-Cambridge rail link, needs a new vote on routing, ours stands as the best. Northern Route unsatisfactory, bypassing Bedford southern route then has Universal blocking it and our route needs editing of 1000 houses at Willington to ensure a twin track railway with electrification can get through. These sorts of issues repeat, failure to protect rail routes and lack of government commitment to treating road and rail fairly; is the root of the problem.

1. BRTA Well Being: We face a mammoth task whilst larger groups like Railfuture and Campaign for Better Transport (CBT) seem to have lost their way somewhat. Laudable to be resourced to publish reports and call conferences, but unless the vital spade work of protecting routes is well peopled, organised and being done nationwide; the effort falls down.
BRTA is under-resourced. Our goals are clear:
a. push as much as we can for a nationwide government supported programme of local rail reopenings, select pieces of new-build and existing rail upgrades and capacity enhancements.
b. a programme of former rail routes, lands and especially where junctions existed, to be protected from non rail related intrusive development. We must have former rail routes and new proposed route corridors kept open for possible future reopening/rebuild. Failure to do that at least adds to cost and upheaval and closed down modal choices in a context of growth, development and exacerbates all the bads of road building agendas and their spin-off consequences and impacts.
2. In order to do that, we need a steady flow of people joining, donating and providing reliable volunteering on fronts we need filling and strengthening BRTA internally with reliable administration, ensuring the Executive Committee on and off line is quorum and ensuring the proper lead-management of the forums, which can play a role, but need proactive follow up, marketing and team building.
3. Update on Campaigns:
a. Great Central Corridor Old Oak Common to Leicester Central: Like all other reopening route options under attack and pressure. It needs a team loosely working together in a coordinated manner. Great need for it, HS2 is not a silver bullet and we ideally need both, and if you, like me, believe conventional rail is essential now, then join in with us to help progress our projects.
b. Gloucester-Ross-on-Wye-Hereford. We need local people to join, take a lead and help usher the feasibility study it needs, protect the remaining corridor and deviation spaces. 
c. Twin Track Rail Bridge across the Severn Estuary, much needed to give more capacity for more by rail. It needs someone to court council and other outlets to support and get a study done.
d. Guildford-Cranleigh-Horsham and Shoreham: West Sussex County Council admit it would be a god-send now, but in the name of encroachments are pursuing a policy of proliferated abandonment and blockages more! Such belligerent beggars belief when all they are doing is adding to congestion, new roads and traffic blight, when they say they want a better environment?! The project needs a team to work on progressing it.
As Campaigns Coordinator, I can give guidance, but I cannot pursue every campaign myself, sorry, but that is unrealistic.
4. Area Reps: You can do your own forums on and off line, recruit members, build a team, delegate down and advance the cordoned agendas as laid out on our website. You don't have to do it all, but doing something, liaising and sending up updates for dissemination, is the minimum we do need please. Everyone needs to be tolerant, able to forgive discrepancies and get on with the tasks set before us conjointly.
Area Reps are needed for North West, East Anglia, West Midlands, West Country (Wilts, Hants, Gloucestershire and Bristol area for example). 
We have 50 members, we need more like 500 members. We will do our bit; but must be a team effort. Organising any 5 people in any constituency to email their MP in support of BRTA is powerful, costs little time and yet if that model is repeated, turns interest more to us.
Thanks very much.

Yours sincerely,


Richard Pill
BRTA CEO











Saturday, 17 October 2026

Re-Rail Dunstable! A commitment is needed.

https://brtarail.com/dunstable/

The British Regional Transport Association (BRTA) calls for support for re-railing #Dunstable! Much is against it on all sides and ways, but rail delivers footfall, spend and regeneration in its wake which few other options do. Dunstable is caught in a catch 22 whereby Central Bedfordshire Council is too spread out and under resourced to strum up such a vision, pluralism melts when singularity and focus demands dedicated commitment!

In a nut shell, it is a clear choice #Luton (separate Unitary Council) and Dunstable which they need to determine and decide on principally "Busway versus Railway" in modal choices, futures and directions. Busways are cheaper, but do not do bulk, rarely inform modal shift from cars to rubber wheeled buses and concrete renewal is an on-going cost, do bus revenues justify it? That leave Dunstable out on a limb from the rail network and 5 miles to the nearest rail station, is a set back to well-being in numerous ways to get out and go anywhere by rail beyond the mere locked-in 'locals' which buses only agendas inform sadly majoritively?

BRTA would welcome people to join, offer reliable voluntary services and help over a 20 year period nurture policy and practises which move Luton and Dunstable towards a shared rail link re-conversion and benefits shared. It needs a study on confirming the case, why and how and scoping for taking it forward to link Milton Keynes with Luton Parkway Railway Station. Integrated to Thameslink, it offers a bolt-hole off the Midland Main Line (MML) enabling more trains to serve and go through Luton Railway Stations.

Existing stone freight sidings at Luton could be relocated to a new freight servicing depot adjacent to the main line at Sundon, enabling a new 5 track, new under-arch at Hitchin Road Bridge and a duck-under to plough through existing Luton Interchange with a railway - bus shared land space with a new Luton Railway Booking Hall.

BRTA makes suggestions, plants ideas but a study can work up practicals and leaders must decide if the re-railing is a sense of direction our leaders at all levels wish to go over a 20 year plan, relocate, policy and development strategy? National Government has a role too and people can email their local MP's to call for support, research and working up tangible options to give the public a say, a choice and invest for the best outcomes. Contrast this to the staus quo languishing of the two town centres.

Likewise, with growth approved, £billions pour into the profits of London Luton Airport and associates, a portion of that money should be re-directed to invest in re-railing a new Luton-Dunstable-Milton Keynes rail link and an eastward extension via the #Knebworth area to link from the south to #Stevenage and enabling onwards to #Cambridge for excample. Not either Oxford-Bedford-Cambridge versus Milton Keynes-Dunstable-Luton and beyond, we need both, serving different markets, different populations, complementing each other and enabling more by rail, lowering congestion, pollution, ill-health and bringing tangible benefits on and off the rails.

Our diagrams are illustrative of a vision, they need working up to a specification; but our faith and what we hold out, is if taken up and progressed, everyone will benefit from local to regional and integrated to the national too! ceo@brtarail.com  








Tuesday, 29 September 2026

Bedford-Northampton Rail Campaign: A call for action!

Update 14-10-2026:

BRTA Press Release 14th October 2026

BRTA dismayed at the lack of advocacy at strategic regional planning and transport matters by Northampton Council and Agency Representatives:

Why is Northampton being left out? Why is Northampton not represented at The Forums Meetings? A direct rail link from Northampton to Bedford/Universal and vice versa is needed and we need the councils to speak up and not be silent or withdrawn. That serves no-one!

The British Regional Transport calls on the councils to wade in and get involved:
1. Advocate for a new-build Northampton-Bedford rail link via Brackmills and Bromham Bedford to link with tracks and integrated rail service to Universal, East-West Rail and expanding Luton Airport and vice versa those audiences at a transit end-to-end time of 35 minutes to footfall, spend and regenerate Northampton!
2. Missing out on the action, even though Northampton is part of the Oxbridge Arc, is a failure to represent, serve and advocate for the Northampton interest, a missed opportunity and roads will be strained as with land use parking demand, which otherwise in impact terms would be mitigated.
3. MP Mike Reader has spoken up to Lord Hendy about the Northampton Rail Link angle but Lord Hendy is not showing any interest - he should. It is a once in a generation opportunity to make a lasting fixed rail public transport infrastructure conducive with growth and sustainability; government should be calling in the 93 houses passed to block lands at Bromham wanted for the Northampton rail link to link physically with existing lines north of Bedford.

BRTA CEO Richard Pill says "The development of the national Universal Theme Park and associated developments present a magnetic appeal for visitorship to and from but also employment and supply chain opportunities to the tune of 26, 000 jobs. Government must be lobbied to realise the facility needs better rail access from all directions and should ensure this can be done as a golden opportunity to make growth real for Northampton benefitting from it. Currently Northampton is out on a limb and under-represented. All parties and councils need to coalesce and work together more.
Bedford Areas Traffic is reaching gridlock at times now, so 55, 000 extra visitors per month, will exacerbate unless we get the rail link; a lasting legacy and of national significance; it must not be allowed to be lost in these critical discussions or absence thereof! It is time to update the previous studies."

End Press Release

Contacts: Professor Andrew N. Williams BRTA Northampton Area Rep anw@doctors.org.uk and 
Richard Pill BRTA CEO ceo@brtarail.com 


BRTA Press Release 06 October 2026
British Regional Transport Association concern for wider rail linkages
to serve Brackmills Industrial Estate and that of the Universal Theme
Park from Northampton.
The BRTA concern is that the current WNCC travel plan may have missed
an important opportunity to secure Government support for assessing
the potential reopening of the Northampton-Bedford railway line. With
the proposed Universal Resort theme park expected to open in 2031,
significant Government investment is already being directed towards
transport infrastructure in the Bedford area. This presents a unique
opportunity to revisit a scheme that could deliver substantial
economic benefits to Northampton and the wider county.
At present, despite the two towns being only 23 miles apart, rail
journeys between Northampton and Bedford typically take between one
and three hours, often requiring multiple changes. By contrast, a 2014
feasibility study concluded that a reopened direct railway could
provide a journey time of approximately 27 minutes.
Page 64
A direct rail link would significantly improve access between
Northamptonshire and the Universal Resort development. It could help
residents access the estimated 26,000 jobs associated with the scheme,
while also encouraging visitors to use Northampton as a base for
overnight stays and onward travel.
There is also a wider strategic case. Concerns have been raised
regarding the ability of existing rail routes, particularly the
Midland Main Line and West Coast Main Line, to accommodate future
demand generated by the resort. A reopened Northampton-Bedford railway
could provide valuable additional capacity and resilience within the
regional transport network.
Given the national importance attached to the Universal Resort
project, BRTA believes there may be a compelling case for seeking
Government support for a detailed feasibility assessment of reopening
the line. Even a relatively modest investment in a fresh strategic
study could help determine whether this long-standing proposal has a
viable role to play in supporting economic growth across
Northamptonshire and Bedfordshire.
BRTA would be very grateful for any support individuals,
professionals, businesses and the elected representatives along the
line can give and ideally join or affiliate to BRTA in support:
End
Further comment: Professor Andrew N. Williams BRTA Northampton Area
Rep: 07923 489254 
The go ahead to block the rail route was given by a one vote majority, so very close. End of the B2N Campaign? We never say never, but it is against what we want, let's build BRTA to help save the day elsewhere where we may.

Thanks to all those who emailed in.

 re: https://www.bedfordindependent.co.uk/93-home-bromham-plan-faces-backlash-over-countryside-loss-and-rail-impacts/

The planning committee at Bedford Borough Council meets tonight - please see the attached.
We have notified councillors and the media of our view. The lack of champions beyond BRTA is underwhelming sadly.






We never say never here, but this is a critical development and set back. 
The wider point is development is being pushed by governments of all tiers, but the rail infrastructure is not being provided and this defaults to more roads and carving up of land, more brownfield and more patterning spiralling up negatively. It is a far cry from sustainability agendas and that is bad for public health and well-being.
Wade in by all means, but we have done our best and will focus elsewhere unless we get a decision that relocates the proposal for this development elsewhere and supports the rail link as much in Bedford and Universals interest!
Join our free email loop/help get us more support, media interviews and members! ceo@brtarail.com


Thursday, 24 September 2026

Shoreham to Horsham Rail Link


The British Regional Transport Association (BRTA) continues to appeal to the wider public and elected representatives for the following:
1. old formation of rail route to be protected with deviation alignment spaces where blockages may exist as much as possible.
2. For the pooling of talent and resources by councils, agencies and government grants to commission a study to explore the business case, merits, feasibility and engineering required to provide a modern railway serving this glaring gap in the current rail network.
We are progressively delivering our flyer (attached) in the Cranleigh area and welcome donations https://brtarail.com/become-a-member/ and offers to volunteer to help speed up delivery and production of the flyers to more readily get our message across along all parts of the line to a 3-mile cordon either side. 
Simon Barber is coordinating and has been given the task to bring people together over a Costa Coffee and assign locations accordingly to deliver. We deliver flyers until 30th October and re-start 1st February to avoid the winter period. Please pro-affirma offer to help and indeed, where reliable, lead.
If willing, please email your MP and invite them to pro-actively work to get this railway reopened in particular but also for a government backed nationwide programme of local rail reopenings. From the English-Scottish Borders, to Northumberland and elsewhere, those reopenings have far exceeded predicted usages and there is growing public demand for more rail capacity to enable for rail services for people and goods. 
Reality is, as development is going-in, unless the rail network is comprehensive, it tends to translate to growing road usage, congestion, land use for parking amidst other demands and growing exhaust and rubber on hard surfaces, which informs deteriorating health. In short, there is a cross-societal value and benefit if we choose rail again. Please email your MP: https://members.parliament.uk/members/commons?sort=1 
Please also see our wider South East focused programme, these schemes need studying and progressive moves towards enabling reopening: 
BRTA is nationwide in aspiration and with enough new members and actively reliable volunteers, we can be enabled to do more and better. Government paid Transport for the South East (TfSE) are a huge disappointment, they seem to avoid these reopening nettles to grasp as foundational to a more environmentally cleaner way of doing transport and logistics and fail to acknowledge that rail should be more of a priority, as rail deals with bulk people and goods, walking, cycling and buses are good, but periphery to handling mass demand.
Heathrow expansion and that of Gatwick, will bring floods of people, but so far no improved rail access. Guildford-Heathrow Southern Link is the bones of an idea, but needs:
1. a west to north curve from South London/Waterloo directions
2. extension to Old Oak Common (OOC) and via a tunnel to join the Chiltern Main Line for a Banbury/Aylesbury - Guildford and beyond rail arc.
Again, we need the public and politicians on board to advance more joined up thinking and 
3. Guildford-Cranleigh-Horsham would enable more wrap around rail services to Gatwick from Three Bridges for example, the reversal at Redhill is limited and a direct curve from the Tonbridge Lines would also enable more by rail to the Airport and beyond and vice versa, those audiences to wider Kent rail network and the Channel Tunnel.

Please give us your support and let's retain the green and pleasant land of the South East with development being made sustainable, not as an afterthought but as a prerequisite to any expansion plans?




Copyright: David J. Start May 2026 Redhill

The British Regional Transport Association (BRTA) sees the following in favour of reopening this rail link with deviations where blockages now exist:

1. Direct South Coast to Horsham, Gatwick and Guildford rail access for further afield.
2. Save changing at Brighton to get to London
3. Inward footfall, visitorship, spend and regenerative flows minus the traffic
4. More freight off the roads and on the rails with portal connectivity, employment and supply chain stimulus.
We appreciate over the years like so many places, councils have been tasked with providing housing allocations, but not with former rail route protection. Thus all the traffic from residential and industrial expansion goes onto local roads, which then at cost and land-take, are upgraded and so the pattern spirals. That impacts urban and rural air quality, noise levels and environmental blight. If we don't want the pattern, we need to recover select pieces of railway to give modal choices, create modal balance and enable lifestyle choices to 99% car-road dependency cultures. 
BRTA calls for a study into reopening Shoreham to Horsham rail link and how problems structural and engineering can be overcome and cycleways re-routed either alongside a railway or diverted to give routing options. You retain the amenity, but rail handles bulk people and goods, is faster end-to-end and opens up areas to inward investment whilst retaining their land mass and natural beauty.
This may be the last chance, but growing places need more and better rail-based access to and from. You can't put heads in the sand and pretend the glaring gap and associated deficits do not exist. Indeed, were this railway restored to modern standards, it could be part of a regional through route between Brighton and Chichester and Reading/Heahtrow respectively for further afield travel.
At this stage we ask:
1. the remaining corridor is protected adequate width for a twin-track railway corridor
2. a policy of relocation where possible to restore the route. Not all houses need demolition, but enough to enable railway recovery or lands adjacent even bypassing growth areas, to enable a railway end-to-end to be functional.
3. The study can look at business cases, engineering, environmental impact and feasibility to base policy on and advocate with neighbouring councils and agencies to fund the reopening with full government support and that of leveraging in other investors.
Please consider this proposition and I hope our visionary diagram helps put it in a regional and strategic context. 

Tuesday, 22 September 2026

BRTA Aylesbury Forum, Saturday, 17 October 2026 1pm lunch, 2-4pm business at The White Hart, Exchange Street, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, HP20 1UR

 BRTA Aylesbury Forum, Saturday, 17 October 2026 1pm lunch, 2-4pm business at The White Hart, Exchange Street, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, HP20 1UR 01296-468440

Convenor: Simon Barber Email address: admin@brtarail.com 020-8940-4399 or 07522-374740.

1.  Appointment of someone to chair the meeting

2.  Appointment of a note taker

3.  Aylesbury, current update on passenger and freight operations and new opportunities?

4.  The Aylesbury link – Simon to hand out diagram for discussion and how/who will volunteer to progress it?

5.  New Parkway Station for the Claydon area on the East-West Rail Link with Milton Keynes and Bedford? A volunteer to email around it and pursue it.

6.  Rails to Brackley, old Great Central is blocked by HS2, so new-build local conventional rail alongside with new build Parkway Station to the east of Brackley growth area, bus link to Silverston and arc around the area to rejoin old GC north of Brackley as a Phase 2 to a new south Rugby Parkway Station? Needs a study and support. We need a volunteer to pursue it, email around and court support.

7.   Any Other Business

8.  Day, date, time and place of next forum?

9.  Please note: Everyone buys their own food and drink. People are welcome to join BRTA and work with us and our free email loop via ceo@brtarail.com






Monday, 21 September 2026

More Freight By Rail - government has a pivotal role!

 This article may also be of interest: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cw8r61n1z28jo

If we had Northampton-Market Harborough rebuilt: https://brtarail.com/n2mh/ Then Felixstowe to Northampton via Leicester and Peterborough would be possible and take on more, the A14-A45 corridor which even the BBC admit is 'congested'?! Cambridge-Bedford-Northampton is another way, but proceeding at a glacial pace. Reality is we need more rails for more trains now and switching requires investment and that question of where the money is coming from. Meanwhile, the Lower Thames Road Tunnels is to sink £11 billion whereas BRTA would have preferred a rail-based solution instead (Channel Tunnel-East Anglia and vice versa).

BRTA seeks to bridge these gaps in advocating more by rail in infrastructure terms, not necessarily new money, but values, priorities and putting people, places and the environment first at the heart of planning, policy and actions. Therefore tailoring development to allow recovery of former rail routes and new-build rail corridors is prudent and failure to do so, adds to cost and relocation aggro, which no-one wants, but is the inevitable conflict if protection is not done now. That does not mean fallow or dormancy, but ensuring clearances do enable a railway rebuild with electrification to be viable. It is currently in the balance on a nationwide scale with pushes to develop, afterthought about road impacts and rail alternatives. Contact ceo@brtarail.com