Tuesday, 24 April 2018

Calvert-Rugby-Leicester Phased Incremental Approach to Rail Linkages Boost


Great Central Link to give new opportunities and create more relief routes south of Rugby to London and beyond/orbital.

Phase 1: Could an operator be it Chiltern, East West Rail Company or an-other/third party open to the proposition of rebuilding a new line from the Calvert area (links to) along former GC trackbed corridor to a Park and Ride (P&R) Station at Brackley which would act as a rail interchange head off the A43 corridor (Northampton-Bicester/M40/Oxford)? It would require lowering at gradient to the floor of the A43 which runs in a valley but at sufficient height (embankment) to bridge the A43 at the eastern side portal to re-join old GC alignment for Phase 2 to Rugby. Phase 1 would enable:
1.      Brackley to be rail served. Expanding town and industrial estate/logistics area and A43 strategic corridor and Silverstone circuit satellite area.
2.      Commute to and from London.
3.      Could also integrate with East-West Rail for passenger services to Milton Keynes, Bedford and Oxford
4.      Offer freight by rail to London or Oxford-Reading-Guildford-Cranleigh-Horsham-Gatwick-(new curve) onto the Tonbridge -Ashford-Channel Tunnel line direct/London orbital options and also from Oxford to Southampton and South West and vice versa audiences including footfall and spend boosts to numerous local economies.

Phase 2. Rebuilding from Brackley to Rugby West Coast Station would require realignment at Woodford Halse and from south of Willoughby to Barby (new station maybe shared with Barby and Kilsby and likewise further south Willoughby and Braunston). The new line would leave old GCML south of Willoughby and cross over the WCML fast lines to either run down at gradient to twin tracks alongside WCML and link into the Rugby WCML Station for integration (passenger and freight access) or link onto or alongside the Northampton Loop lines and have a direct link to the DIRFT complex.

The benefits would be:
1.      Second London Rugby route and West Coast Main Line and M1/M40 relief, capacity creation.
2.      New commuter flows a new Park and Ride Station on the intersection of the A425 roughly half way between Southam and Daventry both of which are growing towns but have no direct rail access.
3.      Rugby-Oxford, Aylesbury, Marylebone, Old Oak Common and integration for East-West Rail feed and London orbital freight between Midlands and Channel Tunnel and all in between.

Phase 3 to join the Leicester-Nuneaton lines requires new construction with a new curve from the old Midland Line to the GC alongside M1 new build/rebuild and gradient slope to join the Leicester-Nuneaton lines. Freight can get to Derby and vice versa via Knighton Junction, Burton and passenger services to Leicester and Nottingham and Derby via Leicester. Benefits:
1.      Chiltern/South Midlands to East Midlands Airport and vice versa direct by rail to a plethora of connectives and outlets.
2.      Relief to motorways and trunk roads and urban commuting congestion, cleaner air and better balances.
3.      Saving countryside, ensuring massive logistics warehouses can be located rail connected more and thus giving more impetus for more freight by rail including possible new flows/market share.
4.      4. Expanding populations means we need to restore/new build some conventional lines. HS lines don’t cater for large swathes of the heart of England and don’t cater for more freight by rail as existing lines will want more passenger operations – freight gets squeezed out/is assumed to go by roads – observe M1/M6 and A14 for example.

Conclusion:
1.      Do we support a phased approach or an ‘full on’ all-in approach or a mixture for ERTA?
2.      Whatever you may wish for has to be balanced with what can give/take and the lie of the land on the ground with creeping development, weak planning and lack lustre local government will to put strategic rail corridors first in tailoring development and protection terms, yes, they and we are under pressure – time, resource, competition and so forth.
3.      Whatever we decide, without major player backers we will not get very far, so that must be a delegated meeting focus and endeavour. Organisations must take on, join, donate or offer to resource/do/support or else it may not happen.
4.      What else?

R.B. Pill 23-04-2018
richard.erta@gmail.com




No comments:

Post a Comment