Showing posts with label protection. Show all posts
Showing posts with label protection. Show all posts

Saturday, 15 May 2021

Great Central Report - pdf with photos available via richard.erta@gmail.com

 

After crossing Olney Lane at SP 5166 7252 the trackbed is part of the Great Central Way, a well-maintained cyclepath and footpath, for the next 3km. The line of the former railway is unbroken north of here until the point that Abbey Street, Rugby is reached, just before the West Coast Main Line.

{…..detail to come on the bit between Olney Lane and Ashlawn Road}

The trackbed runs under the Ashlawn Road overbridge at SP 5159 7319, and from here until the West Coast Main Line is reached at SP 5160 7569 it is part of National Cycling Network Route 41. Continuing just west of north from Ashlawn Road in a deep cutting (Figure 1) the trackbed passes under the footbridge between Pytchley Road and Catesby Road at SP 5148 7394 (Figure 2). After this the trackbed approaches the site of the former Rugby Central Station. The surface has been well-maintained throughout this walkway, but until a few years ago it had been very muddy in places. Much work has been done to improve the drainage, so now we have good walking/cycling surfaces with areas of wetland to the sides (Figure 3). In places the footpath/cyclepath meanders slightly to move around the wet areas on opposing sides of the path, even though the line of the trackbed is very straight (Figure 4). There are numerous access points for walkers along this stretch.

Looking south along the Great Central Walkway, with the B4429 Ashlawn Road overbridge ahead (SP 5155 7353).

Figure 1 Looking south along the Great Central Walkway, with the B4429 Ashlawn Road overbridge ahead (SP 5155 7353).

Looking south along the Great Central Walkway, towards the footbridge connecting Pytchley Road and Catesby Road (SP 5147 7400).

Figure 2 Looking south along the Great Central Walkway, towards the footbridge connecting Pytchley Road and Catesby Road (SP 5147 7400).

Looking north along the Great Central Walkway, showing some of the nearby wetland (SP 5145 7406, or close).

Figure 3 Looking north along the Great Central Walkway, showing some of the nearby wetland (SP 5145 7406, or close).

Looking south along the Great Central Walkway at the southernmost extent of the raised station platform. It shows how the walkway has been created to meander with vegetation and wetland in pockets on each side (SP 5139 7445).

Figure 4 Looking south along the Great Central Walkway at the southernmost extent of the raised station platform. It shows how the walkway has been created to meander with vegetation and wetland in pockets on each side (SP 5139 7445).

At SP 5141 7438, shortly before Rugby Central Station is reached, the cutting widens out slightly. I think this was probably railway sidings. At the station site itself, the central island platform is still in evidence, and the footpath/cyclepath is carried along the length of the platform while the trackbeds on either side are mainly full of water and vegetation (Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7).

Detail of the wetland that has been established in part of the trackbed at the site of Rugby Central Station (SP 5137 7461).

Figure 5 Detail of the wetland that has been established in part of the trackbed at the site of Rugby Central Station (SP 5137 7461).

Looking north towards Hillmorton Road bridge from the platform at Rugby Central station (SP 5137 7461).

Figure 6 Looking north towards Hillmorton Road bridge from the platform at Rugby Central station (SP 5137 7461).

A closer look at the platform at the former Rugby Central station. Looking north from the trackbed (SP 5139 7447).

Figure 7 A closer look at the platform at the former Rugby Central station. Looking north from the trackbed (SP 5139 7447).

The trackbed passes underneath Hillmorton Road bridge at SP 5137 7464. It is at this point that there would have been passenger access to Rugby Central Station, although the only access now is via switchback footways on the north side of Hillmorton Road bridge.

At various points on this stretch the local Rotary Club has carried out maintenance on self-seeded and dead trees, as well as installing some short stretches of old railway track in order to add to the interest on this section.

Just north of Hillmorton Road bridge the footpath drops down to track level as the northern end of the island platform is reached (Figure 8). The trackbed continues in a cutting towards Abbey Street and the West Coast Main Line, passing under bridges at Lower Hillmorton Road (SP 5137 7490), Clifton Road (SP 5142 7523) and Bridge Street (SP 5146 7535).

Looking south at Hillmorton Road bridge and the northern extent of the Rugby Central station platform (SP 5137 7467).

Figure 8 Looking south at Hillmorton Road bridge and the northern extent of the Rugby Central station platform (SP 5137 7467).

North of Bridge Street the surrounding land falls away and the cutting becomes shallower. The trackbed passes between rows of houses until it reaches Abbey Street at SP 5160 7570. At this point the trackbed is above street level and this section of the Great Central Way comes to an end. A bridge would have taken the track across Abbey Street and further north across the West Coast Main Line, but the bridge has been removed (Figure 9). It is possible to view some of the bridge supports that are still in place when looking north across the West Coast Main Line from the point at which the Great Central Way comes to an end (Figure 10).Remains of the bridge taking the GCR across Abbey Street just before it reaches the West Coast Main Line (SP 5161 7570).

Figure 9 Remains of the bridge taking the GCR across Abbey Street just before it reaches the West Coast Main Line (SP 5161 7570).

Looking at the gap across Abbey Street to the bridge support before the West Coast Main Line is reached by the GCR. The photo is taken from the raised trackbed, at the northernmost walkable extent of this portion of the Great Central Walkway, looking north (SP 5161 7570).

Figure 10 Looking at the gap across Abbey Street to the bridge support before the West Coast Main Line is reached by the GCR. Taken from the raised trackbed, at the northernmost walkable extent of this portion of the Great Central Walkway, looking north (SP 5161 7570).

For the pdf with photos please email richard.erta@gmail.com

 

Sunday, 31 January 2021

Notes from ERTA Meeting Great Central Re-Railing Project/Corridor 29-01-2021 15.00 hrs.

Notes from ERTA Meeting Great Central Re-Railing Project/Corridor 29-01-2021 15.00 hrs.

Present: Cllr Rupert Frost, Colin Crawford, Simon Barber, Cllr David Bill, Owen O’Neill, Richard Pill, Harry Burr, Cllr Peter James, Kathy Keeley and Edward Blackman.

1. Chairman’s Welcome: Simon duly opened the meeting with his one liner of introductory.

2. Apologies for absence:  Chris Heaton Harris (MP for Daventry and Government Rail Minister), Cllr Richard Auger of Northants CC, Cllr Martin Tett of Bucks CC, Cllr Tim Mills of Aylesbury Vale, Mr James Tierney of Maritime Transport and Mr Mike Reed.

3. The need to save and re-rail the corridor with deviations where blockages cannot be overcome: Richard explained that ERTA’s goal is to get people to join and inform a team of assistants under Simon to nurture the project along, trackbed watch, protect the route as much as possible from piecemeal development threats and court professional and political support as much as possible, who in turn are to invest in studies and take it on to the next phase towards delivery. People were encouraged to let Simon have their details and ideas of who else to contact for his database.

4. The need for studies, BCR Listing and Business Case firmed up: Owen O’Neill said we should wait until England’s Economic Heartland (EEH) complete their passenger study phase 2 looking at transport demand in various nodes along this corridor. It is due to report in April 2021 and includes south of Rugby. Census figures were also mentioned. Cllr David Bill said we have a plethora of depots springing up, some rail-connected but generate many lorry movements as well and that was a concern. Owen explained to us what the Golden Triangle loosely meant consisting of Lutterworth-M1, M6, M69.

Peter James mentioned that Magna Park was a development which is near the GC cordon and was not there as an example when the Rugby-Leicester lines were closed. Owen then gave a useful look at his paper to be published and diagrams of Rugby-Narborough via Magna Park using the old Midland route out of Rugby. It was said about the ownership of the corridor through Rugby and the loss of the old viaduct. This is a setback, but on the other hand economies of scale are that were it HS2 for example, they would think nothing about putting a new one in.

4. Route SWOT – Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats: This was deferred to elsewhere and to wait for EEH’s study. It was stressed that unless we can raise enough people to trackbed watch, we cannot have intelligence on development threats and the need to protect the corridor was vital. We need local councils on board as well as Government and other agencies.

5. The need for a loose coalition of reliable volunteers to work together and share roles

- let Simon have your details for his database: See item 3.

6. Area focuses:

a. Calvert-Brackley-Woodford Halse

b. Banbury-Woodford Halse

c. Woodford area to Willoughby-Barby and into Rugby

d. Rugby-Magna Park-Lutterworth-Narborough for onwards to (freight Knighton) and passenger (Leicester).

These were put on hold until EEH report, showing what demand. Lutterworth has 10, 000 population and is expected to grow. It is also where the east-west A14 from Felixstowe meets M1 and M6 corridors. See note below *

7. Local, conventional rail link with passenger and freight in scope from Southampton/Bristol-Oxford-Rugby-Leicester in scope: Discussion on local, regional and wider national implications was discussed. On the one hand HS2 is expected to create capacity down the West Coast Main Line (WCML), whereas a bottleneck existed between Didcot and Oxford. Reading was also cited (freight from Southampton for example) as getting stuck on the cushions at the curve from Basingstoke to the Didcot main line. Discussion was had on whether the Bucks CC and Windsor Link idea of reinstating the Bourne End to High Wycombe line with Grendon-Calvert (GC) would provide more flexibility of operations to ease things? Likewise, once off main line tracks north of Oxford, GC link provides extra capacity so may relieve going via London or Birmingham tracks more and attract new as yet not being done new to rail from along the line and end-to-end wherever to wherever via these metals. It was also discussed about intermediate locations and stations. HS2 is a fast line and won’t provide a station at Brackley for example, so the scope for a domestic line alongside HS2 which does, remembering Brackley has A43 and Silverstone orbits as well as a growing place in its own right. Likewise, Woodford Halse, Southam-Daventry via the A425, which GC intercepts half way roughly with possible Parkway Station opportunities. North of that with Willoughby-Rugby/Barby-Rugby Midland needs specific studies on various aspects. Demand is one, engineering and inclusivity scoping another – the re-railing of growing communities, bringing rail access closer.

Warwickshire County Council is apparently doing a Public Transport Survey – Simon to follow up and report back. RFI = Rail Freight Interchanges. Colin offered to talk to Maggie Simpson of the Rail Freight Group (RFG). It was also recommended he and Simon talk with Mr Andrew Pritchard of the East Midlands Transport Group of Councils.

8. Getting bigger fry on board:

a. developers: Gazeleys was mentioned. DB Tritax Symmetry – lorries part, if they are focusing on rail east-west that could be Liverpool and East Coast, but lorry movements could hit M1 for north-south as no rail choices exist between Leicester-Nuneaton and Rugby for example, which is a strategic gap in the rail network.

b. rail industry/business people: Colin and Simon would seek a meeting with Chiltern to try and see what comes of it. East-West Rail are toying of dropping their Claydon-Aylesbury arm and so someone else may wish to fill it passenger-wise, given Calvert is to be developed to new town size. Could it be that Chiltern could aspire a domestic rail (or build a coalition) to re-rail Brackley alongside HS2 as a domestic line with Parkway Station for catching A43, Silverstone (bus link) and growing Brackley commute options which could negotiate running to or having a connecting station with East-West Rail? So, if we got Rugby-Narborough and Aylesbury-Brackley, the ‘gap’ between then then intensifies to get re-instated rail corridor.

c. Political will at all tiers: Chris Heaton Harris MP for Daventry and Rail Minister as well as other MP’s along the corridor who can sponsor Westminster Meetings. Simon manages a database for the ERTA Westminster Team to work on these matters as well as a Government stipulated rail corridor protection initiative. Needs more people and via Zoom under present circumstances, to be operationalised now. Guildford-Horsham and the canal threat was mentioned as another example of trackbed vulnerability. Once lost, locks growth into roads and that is why GC also has credentials as providing a rail choice to roads.

d. public: Please recommend ERTA to others, to join as a member, to attend meetings like today and grow our teams.

9. Appointment of any volunteers and for what/where/how – answerable to Simon and the Executive Committee (EC): There were none currently.

10. Any other pre-notified business: There was none except to notify next Zoom Meeting for GC Matters was 12 March 2021 15.00 hours. Would enable updating notwithstanding EEH’s later date of delivery.

Note from item 6*: Midland route out of Rugby/GC through Rugby or variations takes on the western side approach to Leicester of the M1 corridor. Northampton-Market Harborough with a widened base for footpath and railway corridor takes on eastern side of M1 approaches to the Leicester area. We must support both for their own merits, reducing road congestion, traffic and informing modal shift is the name of our game for good social, environmental and economic reasons. Yes, Northampton-Rugby-Leicester may be advantageous asking why we need another line for purposes of optimising demand, but there are other local-regional reasons why we need both.

Please note, it is ERTA’s goal to see the re-railing as we are convinced it has merit, that is not up for discussion. Finding means-ways and people to get it delivered is the next step. Northampton rail matters are for the meeting 19-02-2021 15.00 hrs via Simon Barber T. 0208 940 4399, E. simon4barber@gmail.com

https://ertarail.co.uk/events/