Wednesday, 31 January 2024

Bedford Town Centre Feedback Consultation

Although deadline is past, please write to Bedford local MP and elected Borough Councilillors supporting these suggestions as well/help advocate them:

1. St Peters Street. Could consideration be given to 

a. making the bus stop a stop on the 905 Bedford-Cambridge Bus with pick up/drop off and new flag and timetable please? Useful for Eagle Books, Quarry Theatre, local shops and businesses. Also saves extra miles to the Bus Station only restriction.
b. Could consideration be given for a Zebra Crossing or similar halfway along St Peters Street to bridge between local north-facing businesses inc. Lidls and the Eagle Bookshop. It is a long way to walk both ends, it is a busy x2-way thoroughfare for busy traffic flows, making crossing hazardous especially for slower walking people. 
2. Consider this: High Street North-South has many small shops, banks and business outlets but no bus stop/bus service linking it with principal places and the Bedford Midland Railway Station (20 minutes walk for slower people), whereas St Paul's Square has Corn Exchange, Toilets and Oxfam. Can we give High Street some bus drop-off and pick up access benefit please - they all pay their taxes. Sustaining outlets is vital to avoid empty shop syndrome proliferation and negative vibes/spiral down images.
3. Please consider public toilets/cubicles for front of Bedford Midland Railway Station as barriers exist and access/area a public toilet desert, especially for visitors.
4. Can any help be given for BRTA to have its second hand book stall and promotion table reinstated and noticeboard access for wider rail-users contact and engagement please?
5. Can a toilet provision north of Butterfly Bridge be made for multi-use including disabled and baby changing as Town Centre-Aspects is a toilet desert, popular place and outlets for food and drink exist. Toilet provision south of the river is also grossly inadequate/non-existent, ditto Wixams - for people visiting, working and leafleting including disabilities people who need to go/need local access/panic attacks can bring on sudden bowel movements.
6. Grant Palmer services are a mixed bag, their stats need monitoring and tweaking of route and ensuring reliability, reasonable timetables and staff customer friendly training need to be looked into and tweaked as well please. All Grant Palmer bus services should be contracted to call via Bedford Midland Railway Station as a part of their overall bus service routes and provision. 
7. Queens Park. No. 8 Stagecoach bus often gets over-crowding - should be made thrice hourly, especially at peak times 4pm-6.30pm and 7am-9am for example and maybe 12 Noon-2pm (lunchtime). It goes all round wills mothers and means Old Ford End Road and Great Denham is a long journey relatively. Could a Grant Palmer service be contracted to do Bedford Bus Station-Ford End Road-Old Ford End Road - Great Denham-Kempston West End-Stagsden, Bromham and back via Biddenham Turn (orbital) and Ashburnham Road and Midland Road to Bus Station as well?
8. Could No. 41 be reinstated to hourly at least and peak times and midday and go along Bedford-Stagsden Road on onwards to Turvey and Stagsden and all-round village cut back/deferred to the proposed Grant Palmer orbital new please? End-to-end bus timings and frequency are a disgrace and more could be benefited to town centres and commuting for work by improving the bus routes and end-to-end timings without a toilet please.
9. Can X5 be made half hourly at peak times am, Midday and pm and now we have buses than coaches, can it serve a new stop on the corner of Biddenham/A428 Bypass roundabout for Biddenham people and adjacent to have direct bus access to Milton Keynes and into Bedford without changing into and out of town centre again, wasting 20-60 minutes by which time direct, they would have long arrived at MK for example.
Likewise the bus stop back to Bedford from MK Shopping Centre has a dirt path west end with poorly configured access, lacks a litter bin and needs to be kept an eye on please/make cross-council representation to amend the situation.
10. Can the new Bedford-Hitchin Stevenage Bus call via Hitchin Railway Station for interchange and cross modal ticketing for feeding to wider rail network and out-lying areas the bus serves please?
11. MK1 seems well used, but No 44 to Wixams Retirement Centre should be reinstated from Maulden to Flitwick principal Centre Beds Railway Station and vice versa.
12. Can more progress/information be disseminated on a Wixams Railway Station - a long way from A6 (!) (needs a bus arcing) and hurry the process up or public admit half-hearted/protracted bureaucratic and developer abuse defeat when it was originally promised, ditto more shops and amenities of a 'new town'?
13. Can consideration be given/explored on a new Sustrans cycle-way between Bedford/Harrowden/Abbeyfields area to Shefford Town Centre along the former Bedford-Hitchin corridor/through Old Warden Tunnel for walking, cycling, leisure and recreational corridor with wildlife/off road access for the public? Footfall and spend for Shefford (onwards cycle access to Arlesey Station and other places) and more to Bedford/something to promote. Healthy lifestyles also a benefit/reduces cost/increases satisfaction/appreciation.
14. Can Mill Street be made one-way towards the High Street/Debenhams and made a single lane for access and traffic, with pavement widening especially on the northern side with trees and benches for more leisure/window browsing and rejuvenation for small outlets who really need more footfall and flow. People walk past on busy narrow pavement space x wheelchairs and other pavement users (right or wrong/hazardous) and needs reform.
15. With the closure of the Civic Theatre we lost a ground-access public amenity for conference, plays and other public events. Harpur Centre and Corn Exchange has step access and is a barrier to attracting people off-the-streets to engage with events/making viability more. Can a round-table to court grants and funding be made to buy as a civic outlet for displays, arts, museum and public events akin to Harpur Suite, the former Howard Chapel in Mill Street bridging as it would High Street and Museum/Higgins/Panacea/Bunyan with more area footfall and spend on the back of it please. It should not be used as a nightclub or similar, the deteriorated condition of the former grave-stones with vandalism is a disgrace and shows a lack of care, diligence of the past and history and inheritance. If we work at securing a round-table and investors/grants it could be used as a civic amenity and the west-side side-passage opened up for public access by public between Mill Street and Ram Yard areas and vice versa.
16. On another note may I ask the Bedford Park concerts, winter wonderland and all such, be moved to out-of-town areas like Twinwoods as noise, attracting drug dealing, other crimes and swamping St Michaels Road area with parking, uncouth behaviours and lowers the tone of the area, with noise and abuses. A linking bus for such events between Bedford Midland Station, Bedford Bus Station and events like rock concerts, should also be demanded for outlay inclusion of minimum requirement provision as part of ticketing arrangements x every event. Only theatre, classical music, band-stand free amenity music and Christian and similar Services/public open-air gatherings like rallies; should be allowed in Bedford Park, peace, quiet and recreation should be the culture to foster generally. I hate the commodification of public spaces and amenities in built-up residential areas. 

Feedback - please write and support our calls:

On other aspects: The Parade of Shops in Bedford Road, Kempston could do with a Greggs and a Mc Donalds.

Support a better public transport and environmental deal for Bedford!

 

Ø    A proper railway station on the Bedford-Bletchley Railway to serve the Retail Park and wider Kempston area? Bring back our trains and retain local stations. Please volunteer.

 Ø    The East-West Rail Link goes via the old route (St John’s) and eastwards avoiding knocking down houses. Likewise, to have physical arms to enable south of Peterborough and north of Stevenage/East Bedfordshire direct rail access from where they live to Bedford and the Oxford corridor and vice versa – essential footfall and spend minus congestion? See: https://ertarail.co.uk/publicity/ for a good read.

Ø    For a formal year-on-year traffic reduction strategy to cut congestion, waste, emissions and deteriorated public well-being? We need planning and policy with enforcement of existing laws and safeguards.

Ø    Stations at Wixams (happening now), Ampthill and Stations North of Bedford (e.g. Oakley, Sharnbrook, Irchester, Burton Latimer, Desborough and Kibworth etc)? Plus, a seamless single train service to and from Leicester and all in between? Say “no” to having to change at Kettering for example!

Ø    That pedestrian areas have segregated cycling. That traffic free spaces are made more the norm for our town centre with better enforcement against abusers? It is time to ‘level up’ town centres with out-of-town shopping areas!

Ø    A circular bus shuttle linking the main Bedford Midland Railway Station with Tavistock Street, High Street, Borough Hall/Kingsway, Prebend Street, and the railway station and for Grant Palmer bus services to loop the railway station as a part of their overall journeys?

Ø    new-build/new route Bedford-Northampton rail link for direct access by rail to Birmingham and vice versa to Bedford, Cambridge, and Luton? It needs a will for a way to be done. Land needs protecting with identified corridor to enable option to be retained.

Footfall and spend is contagious for informing sustaining other businesses and area outlets. The lack of a footbridge between Southfields Kempston and the Retail Park is an indictment of a lack of foresight as well.

Better security and patrolling at Bedford Bus Station to clamp down on alcohol, littering and reassuring the public they are not in the wild west/lawless culture would also be useful.

A commitment to nurturing more wind farms on-shore/Renewable Energy and more Archimedes Water Screws between Bedford and Olney. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archimedes%27_screw

Make St Cuthberts one-way going north and Bushmead Avenue one-way south to Castle Road. St Cuthberts/St Peters Street Junction is a busy place and pedestrians pay the price. It needs reform with equal red light across both junctions for adequate and consistent pedestrian safe access across these roads - 20 seconds per time minimally please. Benefit, is to cut queues and waiting time on Goldington Road going westwards at the St Cuthberts Junction, lowering canyoning and emissions.

Bedford is lovely except for congestion, pollution and wasting time in road queues exacerbating the problem. Public health and well being by tacking it is well documented.


Merging Central Beds Council with Bedford Borough to form one Unitary County Council may also be worth looking at. Bedford could have a elected town council (reduce quangos) (see Northampton for details).

Midland Road West, Gateway to Bedford Town Centre is shabby. It should be an east-west High Street and treated akin to the north-south traditional High Street - done up, not done in! One-way west traffic, one-way east for buses, cycles and pedestrians (widen pavement space with chairs and a few trees and litter bins).

Hope of interest. Sorry it is long or repetitive, but hope you get the big picture and small details. It is not about spend when finances are thread-bare, rather working with what can be done and quick win, wins whilst getting out rail alternatives and buses integrated and comprehensive enough to offer a real alternative for people and goods and associated social, economic, environmental and moral well-being.

Join BRTA and be part of the answer not the problem!




Northampton-Market Harborough (N2MH) Rail Link News Update.

Update on 26-03-24 

Network Rail - their 2020 report redacted on commercial grounds their calculated freight and passenger capacity figures. These were not obtainable even under a final FOI appeal. 
Such figures have usually found to be gross underestimates when the lines are fully reopened.
The Borders line opened 2015, its 2019 annual figures were 1.3 million passengers. This was on 2 tph, mostly single track railway going from out of the borders  to a main station. 
The recently reopened mostly dual tracked Ebbw Vale to Newport line (2024) will have 4 trains per hour (56 per day). N2MH would on NR estimates be fully dual tracked and linking the two busiest rail lines in the country. 4tph seems a reasonable estimate 
The 2020 NR report does not show the population growth, since several housing developments are taking place along that corridor. 
EEH - I heard Naomi Green speak at the STB Meeting at the NEC Birmingham last July and said hello to her there.
The last EEH meeting was held in December 2023 but Professor Andrew Williams was not able to attend due to personal reasons and the county councillor who was supposed to be turning up apparently his car broke down on the way. 
In spite of the ministerial written answer of October 2023 for us to work with EEH for N2MH, N2MH was not on the EEH December meeting's agenda. Further direct enquiries, with EEH related that 'N2MH did not meet the necessary threshold'
Zoom meeting held Feb 2024 with Ms Green to determine what these thresholds are. This has been separately minuted and sent to Richard. Basically, a very different conversation would be being had if this was a PFI initiative, and therefore to move forward with N2MH the elected local and county councils have to be fully on board and supportive
 
Professor Williams and not EEH mentioned the green dividend that now comes from building any infrastructure project in the UK  as related at the STB meeting at the NEC in July. 
We do not know what this means for NB2MH. Professor Williams specifically wanted the updated study to quantify what this could precisely mean, so that residents of  North Northants and South Leicestershire  could themselves choose from a range of options. Professor Williams suggested, sensory gardens, some re forestation,  and parks with equal access for all children with disabilities as potential options. The study will surely provide other options too.
West Northants Council - there has been no discussion from both West and North Northants Councils on the rail link. FOI request and answer from March 2023  stating no discussion at all since two county councils were established was mentioned.
Northampton's local community launched a campaign(1000 voices) calling for West Northants Council to clean up Northampton's toxic air pending an imminent writ being served on them by DEFRA for this inactivity. 
This 1000 voice campaign uses figures from the British Heart Foundation stating annually the 1000 excess deaths countywide and 102 for Northampton. This campaign has received wide national TV publicity BBC and ITV and further demonstrations are planned for next week.
A Northampton Local Councillor recently told Professor Williams that he did offer to purchase some monitors to assess pollution in his ward, but was told the council had no means to collect any data obtained. No such monitors have been purchased.
Ove Arup Associates  - at the STB meeting at the NEC in July last year they quoted to me a figure that such a survey costs £80,000. They have not undertaken any such survey concerning N2MH
Northampton South Labour PPC - the prospective Labour candidate for our forthcoming election is in favour of re-opening the Northampton-Market Harborough railway. Mr Peter Doveston has an email from him which needs to be precisely quoted and included here 
Questions were raised about the capacity of Leicester for N2MH. The truth is we do not know what this is and NR have withheld their own figures.
Concerning these alleged Leicester issues, Professor Williams should have raised the option of changing at MH and then waiting up to 15 minutes to connect to the Leicester service. This would still mean a reduction in Northampton to Leicester by rail from 90 plus minutes to around 50 minutes, still a significant saving.
Market Harborough Station - we are calling for the station's enhanced capacity to be considered as part of the updated report.
Mr Perter Doveston mentioned a currently being created  Northampton Transport plan for which N2MH needs to be included 

Unless N2MH within the next 6 months start to get lift off from the local and county councils  to assist with funding an updated report to be included within the future transport plan, then chances of future success will remain very small.




30 January 2024


Press Release

BRTA Calls on all leaders, to give support to a rebuilt Northampton-Market Harborough Rail Link to reduce chronic congestion, air pollution and make proliferated development more sustainable.

It presently takes 90 plus minutes to commute by train from Leicester to Northampton. However, using Network Rail's own figures from a suppressed and incomplete 2020 report on reopening the Northampton to Market Harborough line (N2MH) this figure would reduce to 34 minutes - including 3 stops.

However, despite a positive parliamentary answer in October 2023, progress towards reopening remains painfully slow. The 2020 Network Rail report is not in the public domain and required several FOI requests to obtain a redacted copy and additional information. However, FOI appeals have been unsuccessful to release the estimates for freight and passengers N2MH would bring, the grounds for rejection being 'commercial sensitivity' As N2MH was pulled up in 1982, I believe that this amounts to suppression of information.

All successful UK railway reopening schemes have far exceeded their original optimum passenger estimates N2MH would link the 2 busiest railway lines in the UK and provide a strategically important east-west corridor for freight.

With the opening of the Northampton Gateway Depot this year, (initially opposed by both Northants County councils and all Northants local councils) 7500 additional jobs will be brought.


We in the BRTA   believe that reopening N2MH could bring many thousands more jobs to Northamptonshire as well as reducing the excess mortality in Northampton from pollution - regarded as the worst in the country.


We in the BRTA are seeking that the Network Rail 2020 report regarding reopening N2MH is updated, completed, and brought fully into the public realm, I would be very happy to discuss further.

Our next meeting - which is open to all - is: ERTA Northampton Working Group Meeting – Saturday 10 February 2024 from 2 – 4pm.
Venue: Northampton Quaker Meeting House 
(Emmeline Davies Room), Wellington Street, Northampton. 

All welcome. The purpose of the Working Party is to offer/assign everyone a role and area of responsibility, grow teams and progress the what needs doing as determined. It is not a talk shop or discussion forum as such, it must be hands-on. Please try and assist with making thing work and enabling things to get done. Richard is chairing and is in coordination and delegation role. It needs local people to engage and show leadership based on sound judgement.

For further comment, please contact Mr Richard Pill, BRTA CEO 01234 330090 richard.erta@gmail.com or 
Professor Andrew N Williams anw@doctors.org.uk T: 07923489254   





 


Thursday, 25 January 2024

BRTA Bedfor Area Forum Dates and Notes:

Forum Minutes from 27-03-24

BRTA Bedford Area Forum Minutes: Wednesday 27th March 12 Noon Food, 13.00 Business – upstairs, which closes at 15.00 hrs. Venue: Costa Coffee (upstairs) 20 Silver Street, Bedford, MK40 1SU.

 

Present: Cllr Tom Wootton, Mayor of Bedford, David J. Start, Simon Barber, Richard Pill and David Ferguson, Samantha Laycock from Harpur Centre.

 

Agenda:

 

1.                      Apologies for absence: Leonard Lean

2.                      East-West Rail Discussion, points and crossings: We had a discussion with the Mayor on Bedford-ECML and East-West Rail generally. We made our position known of ‘east of Bedford via the St John’s area and that of physical links with the ECML for optimal reaches and ranges by rail into Bedford from north of Stevenage, East Bedfordshire and south of Peterborough as well as a route onwards to Cambridge and wider East Anglia and vice versa to Bedford and beyond to Oxford.’

Discussion was had on the idea of two new bays at Bedford Midland for up to 8-coach trains (passenger) to reverse into and out of from Oxford and Cambridge as well as the Bletchley all-stopper shuttle. However, a new through track would be needed for freight from the east and west to go north via Midland Main Line (MML) and vice versa. This could feed into the two slow line existing tracks and vice versa.

However, it remains BRTA’s conviction that if you have Route Northern E via Ravensden, you apart from steep gradients (not ideal for freight), have a need for more tracks north of Bedford and this in turn would necessitate the knocking down of houses for such. Our route ‘east of Bedford via St John’s’ does not require that and enables strictly east-west freight to bypass the Bedford Midland ‘box’ as the reinstatement of a rail triangle enables passage of freight ‘not via Bedford Midland’ to avoid the station altogether.

Mayor Tom mentioned the proposed Universal Theme Park at the former Clay Pit area between Kempston Hardwick (Bedford-Bletchley) and Wixams (Chimney Corner area) for access by rail from the two lines (London-Leicester and Oxford-Bedford-Cambridge). Indeed, the developers want the physical rail linkage at Tempsford for a wider reach to their site by rail, citing York to Bedford in scope. With an expected 18 million visitors a year, these rail-based solutions chime with the kind of world BRTA wants x whatever it is on a sustainable basis. If we do not have the rail infrastructure, then whether it be more development or dualling the A428 from the A1 to Cambridge Caxton Roundabout, these only heap up congestion to urban areas informing gridlock and pollution tolls. This must be understood by all sides. Tom said that if we miss and muck up the east-west rail and fail to get the design specification right, we lose out for a generation by which time the development curtain would curtail any reasonable route option. For our route, level crossings are Cardington Road and that of entrance to Priory Park would need representation for special dispensation via Office of Road and Rail (ORR). Our route requires few if any houses to be knocked down however, some have extended gardens over old trackbed at Willington, but at a cost, Willington can be bypassed (speed is not everything, keeping wheels moving and decluttering roads is more!) requiring bridging the River Great Ouse twice and a slight incline to embankment south side east of Willington to arc the cycle path (which can be slewed) and climbing to bridge the Willington-Great Barford and Great Barford-Blunham roads and continue to avoid flood plain issues of flooding and cross the A1 and lower to either north or south of Station Road, Tempsford for physical rail linkage to the outer slow lines of the ECML respectively as well as the duck-under through tracks to Cambridge. No segregation, no extra station, no development before formal acceptance of this track arrangement. If people can get on a train at St Neots or Sandy and go direct by one train to Bedford in 20 minutes or less, it beats anything road can do and would be attractive. If people have to change in the middle of nowhere and face connecting delays either way, it will not go down well. Like Wixams, houses without much in the way of facilities, is less than ideal. It could be that the ECML could be made 4 tracks between Huntingdon and Peterborough to increase how many trains per hour of whatever descript, but moreover, doubling the outer slow lines north of Stevenage or Hitchin to Peterborough or either side of Sandy-Hitchin for East-West intersectional purposes, could be looked at and costs shared between East-West Rail and that of the ECML for example. The south to east curve, would enable by rail from south of Peterborough to Addenbrookes by rail and another freight route as per by Ely for wider Greater East Anglia.

The Mayor asked us to work on the Bedford Midland Station aspect and continue our good work to champion our route and associated matters. He was thanked for giving us his time and we wish him well in helping nurture the way ahead for a viable and inclusive east-west rail solution. We at BRTA are open to talk with Labour and Lib Dems, but they seem to want Northern Route E with or without houses being knocked down at any cost or half-hearted on our preferred route being given much credence.

3.     Bedford-Northampton and 6-tracking north of Bedford: It was explained that we believe 2 slows with a new flyover off those tracks, possibly an extra bridge over the River Great Ouse, would not require 60 houses to be knocked down as Northern Route E does. We want the councils along the route to work together to identify a viable new rail route and protect/tailor development around it and ensure it is progressed, forming consortia and studying/making the case for it. Thameslink, access to new freight depots at Northampton, DIRFT and combined with East-West Rail via St John’s could deliver traffic off roads and onto rails more, benefiting all and the environment and land use balances and many other travel benefits. We are willing to discuss and work with any larger sponsor or party willing to associate with us and help take it forward positively. Olney must be bypassed as development has sprawled. Arcing Lavendon and Yardley Hastings and via southern section of the Castle Ashby Estate to link former route at Great Houghton is our line of thought, but our concern is that for profit alone, opponents will put development before tracks, which is unsustainable in the round of endeavour.

4.     Stations North of Bedford (Oakley/Sharnbrook) and a slow-line every station shuttle new service continuum between Bedford and Leicester (minimally) using extended Thameslink or new East Midlands Stock. This was debated. Land sites for accessing the Midland Main Line have been compromised in many cases and new sites or recovery of sites is needed in planning terms over decades to gain station nurture prospects. We need more people willing to help us. Thurleigh former RAE airfield was mentioned and if it was the case of a 5th London airport, routing a railway that way would have made more sense, however Northern Route E is not that and with no station for North Beds residents in design, offers nothing but blight to them.

5.     Bedford-Bletchley Railway: New Universal Development could be a catalyst for more prominence and development of the line. Our observation and view is:

a.     All Halts to be lengthened to 4-coach train use (capacity for more users)

b.    The 2001 study suggested a new station at Retail Park Kempston would inform an extra 100 visits/rail users to the shuttle service per day. With other development – a trade off of duration and numbers/receipts).

c.     Electrification – the DfT / Government demands on business cases, presents costs when common sense could save money and ensure things get done quicker if a local demand exists. Electrification infill between Bedford and Bletchley would enable a Watford-Corby passenger (semi-fast between Bletchley and Bedford and vice versa) using existing or redundant refurbished stock) and that of freight under exact same wires using one locomotive at a time. This apart from any East-West Rail considerations.

d.    Freight on the branch, the gantry for container moving and sidings at Forders remains redundant, could and show be doing more. Links with off M1/A1 and A421 – the rail with loads of capacity, could be doing more if only someone makes it their business to know, to act and nurture by rail business for wider benefits and road wear-tear cost savings and that of time too.

e.     New Station at Retail Park Kempston: See previous notes. Our pdf report is available via richard.erta@gmail.com or off our web page of: https://ertarail.co.uk/publicity/ (scroll down).

6.     Existing local rail and bus services, cuts, improvements and wish lists.

Concerns that Grant Shapps MP down-graded the east-west X5 coach with bike carrying capacity, luggage capacity and a toilet on board to mere local bus operations. On the one hand the coach cannot provide what it did before and 2.5 hours each way between Bedford and Oxford without a toilet deters disabled people for example. It should be investigated again – chicken and egg, you cut and things spiral down, you reinstate and more people choose east-west travel. Bus and train serve different markets. If bus, reinstate stops like Bedford Rugby Ground, if coach, ensure quality experience and capacity for people and esp. students to take their luggage and bikes.

7.     Consultations. Richard would do the Bedford ones as local area rep. Simon elsewhere and/or as an individual where wanted.

8.     Any Other Business:

a.     Samantha Laycock from Harpur Centre, offered us collaboration and possibly a low cost/free stall at the Harpur Centre in Bedford. This was welcomed if it can be done on a bi-monthly basis please.

b.    Colleges and UoB for volunteers recommended, not had much success with voluntary bureaus.

c.     David to chase up the Harpur Trust for funding and also Harpur Suite for a date for our Green Transport Fair – a civic activity. We could then look at costs and grants available to also inform sponsorship and individual trade/tables arrangements, numbers and costs and then start marketing to court and public attendance.

9.     Day, Date Time and Place of next meeting: suggest Wednesday 5th June same time and venue:

Wednesday 5th June same time and venue:

BRTA Bedford and Shire Area Rep is Mr Richard Pill, BRTA CEO:

T: 01234 330090   M: 077520 96392   E: richard.erta@gmail.com

 

Meeting ended approximately 14.30pm


BRTA Bedford Midland Railway Station Stall on Saturday 25th May 10am-4pm at Ashburnham Road, Bedford, MK40 1DS. All welcome. Why not also have a ride on the Bedford-Bletchley local railway, soon to be part of an Oxford-Bedford East-West Railway! Directions: 
Enjoy what Bedford has to offer as well. Bedford Midland is also served by Thameslink and East Midlands Trains as well. Please bring cash to join, peruse our second-hand books and railway related magazines and to donate if you wish.


BRTA Bedford Area Forum: Wednesday 27th March 12 Noon Food, 13.00 Business – upstairs, which closes at 15.00 hrs. Venue: Costa Coffee (upstairs) 20 Silver Street, Bedford, MK40 1SU T. 0333 003 5883 See: https://www.google.com/search?q=Costa+Coffee+Silver+Street%2C+Bedford+UK&oq=Costa+Coffee&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqCAgCEEUYJxg7MgYIABBFGDkyEwgBEC4YxwEYsQMYyQMY0QMYgAQyCAgCEEUYJxg7Mg0IAxAAGJIDGIAEGIoFMg0IBBAAGJIDGIAEGIoFMgoIBRAAGLEDGIAEMgYIBhBFGEEyBggHEEUYQdIBCDYxNzZqMGo3qAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
 
Agenda:
 
1.                     Apologies for absence
2.     East-West Rail Discussion, points and crossings.
3.     Bedford-Northampton and 6-tracking north of Bedford
4.     Stations North of Bedford (Oakley/Sharnbrook) and a slow-line every station shuttle new service continuum between Bedford and Leicester (minimally) using extended Thameslink or new East Midlands Stock.
5.     Bedford-Bletchley Railway:
a.     New Station at Retail Park Kempston
b.    Keeping the every stop shuttle service as a foundational service facility
c.     Infill case for electrification and a semi-fast Watford-Bletchley, every station to Bedford and onwards to Corby?
d.    More freight by rail – using the assets.
6.     Existing local rail and bus services, cuts, improvements and wish lists.
7.     Consultations.
8.     Any Other Business
9.     Day, Date Time and Place of next meeting: suggest Wednesday 5th June same time and venue.
 
Please note:
1.     Everyone is responsible to bring an agenda and follow it. New material or topics can be suggested for next time.
2.     Ampthill-Flitwick ‘Central Beds Forum’ is cascaded to a Time, separate area forum status and will meet at The Swan Pub, Flitwick opposite the main Flitwick Railway Station until further notices.
3.     Actions you can take is:
a.     Join BRTA as a member/get into our loop
b.    Offer to volunteer/assist/niche-gap fill
c.     Donate to BRTA – see website: https://ertarail.co.uk/
4.     We are in transition from ERTA to BRTA – work with it/be patient!
5.     We need people to help with:
a.     Consultations/respond and recommend us and our ideas as local-regional policy
b.    Help with reliable leafleting
c.     Be non-judgmental
d.    Offer to assist Richard as local area rep with reaches and ranges from IT, Sales teaming up and representations/flying the BRTA flag.
e.     Seeking stalls, offering reliable transport and manning them ‘out and about’.
6.     Our meetings are open to all, so all welcome. Supporters especially welcome!
7.     Everyone is responsible for their own food, drink and transport arrangements!
 
BRTA Bedford and Shire Area Rep is Mr Richard Pill, BRTA CEO:

T: 01234 330090   M: 077520 96392   E: richard.erta@gmail.com

BRTA Notes from Bedfordshire Forum – Wednesday 24 January 2024 – 1pm food; 2 – 4pm business, Venue: The Swan Pub, 1 Dunstable Road, FLITWICK, Beds.MK45 1HP at the Side Lounge (no charge) Landlord Phone: 01525 – 754777 Mobile: 07944-044003

Main contact: Mr Simon Barber T. 0208 940 4399 

E. simon4barber@gmail.com

 

Present: Brian Brennan, S. Anderson (Centre Parcs), Cllr Gareth Mackey see: https://www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk/directory_record/1996/mackey_gareth_-_flitwick . Simon Barber, David Ferguson, Richard Pill.

 

1.     Apologies for absence: David J. Start, Leonard Lean.

2.     Ampthill Parkway Station:

a.     Consideration of the Ampthill Doc – what could be added or edited? Feedback was invited on (see addendum (below) doc which may be taken into consideration when revising it/incorporated via richard.erta@gmail.com

b.     Making a business case: Brain Brennan offered to pay the £480 for the 3000 colour gloss flyers and other donations/contributions welcome. It was suggested A5 would go further or be less expensive. Richard to draft the flyer and send to Brian and others for feedback/comment on mor- or-less. Side B would be a membership form. It was suggested we have a QR code for donations and a page dedicated off our campaigns page for Ampthill Parkway Station.

c.      Funding a questionnaire delivered to the Ampthill/Flitwick Areas (£500) (See above 2b. It was suggested we contact DfT and ask if they could either make a grant or study it with a view to initiating professional consideration? Simon Barber offered to ask them. It was felt that quangos may be useful for Government, but we need resuscitated and properly funded elected Local Government! SEMLEP is being wound up as not so effective, EEH are not exactly picking up and running with Northampton to Market Harborough (N2MH).

d.     Funding a study £100, 000 minimum circa thereabouts. Contributors to aspects of such e.g. a pre-study update at £50, 000 and cross-referencing on building sustainable transport accessibility? We need professionals to help court professional sponsorship and funding of a proper study. David Ferguson to contact Duke of Bedford at Woburn to see if a contribution or rep could help us and whether the Duke is willing to be a Patron without obligation. Lockheed Martin was mentioned, Centre Parcs likewise, but as yet no firm offers/marginal benefits.

e.     The projects needs:

-         Sponsors

-         Funding

-         Volunteers: Simon Barber to contact the voluntary bureau and Cllr Mark Smith of Ampthill Town Council.

-         Nurture of local/other support

f.       Any other related considerations:

3.     Relieving Flitwick on the back of additional Ampthill: Some were sceptical as to the merits beyond speculative views. A study would make the case and answer concerns of case stacking up. Duration of stopping time, the model of station and operational consideration.

4.     Wixams Station: A dearth of information around status and land available and much more. Everyone is coy and really needs someone to ask Cllr Coombes of Bedford Borough or the Mayor Cllr Tom Wootton as to timescale of delivery and impediments to that currently.

a.     Status

b.     Date of delivery or not

c.      It was also discussed varying sections of market share. It was explained Ampthill is the name of the town adjacent to the proposed station, but the station itself would serve a wider area with numerous accesses including off Fordfield Road with capacity parking. Flitwick has a land constraint in a 20x5 mile catchment MK East/M1, A507, Marston Vale, Flitwick and Ampthill and out to A6 south of Wixams to Pulloxhill for example and all between. Development south at Westoning combined could overwhelm Flitwick and triple stacking was the only was forward with impact on the bridge over the railway for example.

5.     Stations North of Bedford (SNOB): Sharnbrook, Oakley via Beds Forum, needs studying/council needs to get on board. As per elsewhere, councils need not fork out, there is no money, but can be instrumental in round-tabling and bringing potential parties together.

a.     Oakley, Sharnbrook (Bedfordshire contingent): Irchester/Rushden line via Enroute via BRTA Wellingborough Forum. Northants and Leicester see Wellingborough/Leicester Forums

6.     Kempston Retail Park/Kempston Town (on Bedford-Bletchley Railway): Simon to google Legal and General and email them about the following:

a.     a station on the Bedford-Bletchley line for the Retail Park

b.     cc the Mayor of Kempston

c.      how it would bring more shoppers minus parking space demand and

d.     could they fund/work with others to inform a study?

7.     Bus Links to Stations and integration (No. 44 truncated to Maulden rather than Flitwick for rail station). Also No. 2 Bus Cut Bedford-Flitwick. There is no money. No. 42 hourly and No. 2 to Bedford within 10 minutes and a gap for 45 minutes and pattern repeats Flitwick-Bedford. Well used, the service should not be cut as it serves intermediate areas. No. 44 cut back from linking Maulden with Flitwick Station. No 34 Flitwick-Milton Keynes does A507 corridor.

8.     Any Other Business: BRTA continues to highlight issues, public transport user plight, opportunities and welcomes all the support we can rouse.

9.          Date, Time and Place of Next Meeting: Saturday 11th May, the long room, Quakers Bedford – Simon to make the booking. 12 Noon Pilgrims as usual for lunch 1pm set up room, 2pm business. Speaker welcome providing they take responsibility for their own equipment. Invites are open to any willing to offer. Interim flyer design and printing and delivery will be done. Results will be collated and put on the new campaigns page.

Meeting ended about 3pm.

 

Note:

1.          All welcome to any of our events and meetings: https://ertarail.co.uk/events/

2.          The questionnaire leaflet may raise awareness, curry support and increase membership.

3.          We need more active, local volunteers and tiers of government support. Ampthill Town Council are against, but can Flitwick carry the load for the future in a growth and demand context v land-use adequacy? What of emissions and congestion?