Sunday, 19 February 2017

Oxford-Cambridge Super Highway Con

http://www.oxfordtimes.co.uk/news/15101701.New___3_5bn_Oxford_Cambridge_Expressway_route_could_pass_through_protected_Green_Belt/?ref=fbshr
Austerity to Political Settlement to Despair?

Dear All,

The Government is giving mixed messages. On the one hand it says it wants East-West Rail and the allocation of money in the Chancellor's Statement was followed by a statement by Rt. Hon. Chris Graying M.P. Secretary of State for a new company to be set up to deliver Oxford-Cambridge rail link. How that will rub along with the East-West Consortium and Chiltern Railways who have 'evergreen' railway delivery capability built into their 'unique' 20 year Franchise is far from clear. 

But considering our Councils have gone on record in local papers bemoaning austerity, cuts to services, holes in budgets, community care calls and much more, surely the allocation/sudden finding of £3.5 billion for an exact same axis Oxford-Cambridge super highway beggars credulity and yet that is the done deal "if you want the railway, you must have a new road thrust upon you" and everyone in the room signs up without any spoken thought of objection - we have roads, they are busy, accident prone and congested and we need the rejuvenating, capacity creating rail alternative which has been denied in 50 years of growth (closure 1967- current 2017).

Here's the story from an Oxfordshire perspective rolling out across the Oxbridge arc. It will inform massive development brownfield land creation and take, diminish the rural character and deliver hoards of traffic trying to enter urban areas which lack the land space without de-characterising demolition and widening urban highways at detriment to aestheics and pedestrian/cyclists and which will bung up junctions at M40, M1 and A1 accordingly. The new roundabout at Black Cat Roundabout although doubled, still has long tail backs. All this growth just spirals with bypasses of bypasses to accommodate it at any cost whilst people lie on trolleys and die in hospitals for want of more cash.
Clearly the clinical demand we must have a new road is made by people who are not attuned to compassion or a sense of proportion and balance and if roads only has not worked - many towns suffer from closed shop syndrome and offices above not filled whilst we have a housing and homeless crisis - shows we're not doing joined up-ness and there's a whole house burnt out just off the roundabout at Roff Avenue/Clapham Road Bedford opposite the North End Club which has been redundant for years - no money, overlooked or lack of potential realisation - the result is disparity.

New £3.5bn Oxford-Cambridge Expressway route could pass through protected Green Belt
  
New £3.5bn Oxford-Cambridge Expressway route could pass through protected G...
HIGHWAY bosses are set to recommend a new £3.5bn expressway passes south of Oxford through protected Green Belt ...

Please vote with your feet and support our events. https://ertarail.com/events/

As Nick Ross used to say "don't have nightmares!"

Yours sincerely,



Saturday, 11 February 2017

National Infrastructure Assessment (NIA) for Friday 10th February 2017 ERTA Final Submission

            07 February 2017
Dear Sir/Madam,

National Infrastructure Assessment (NIA) for Friday 10th February 2017 ERTA Final Submission

Our main propositions and secondary considerations:
1. Northampton-Bedford railway reopening
2. Bedford – Sandy-Cambridge East-West Rail Link.

1. Northampton-Bedford. We and our predecessor organisation (BRTA) have been arguing for this rail route to be protected and reopened for 20 years. Key merits we see:
·         Link Bedford and Midland Main Line South with Northampton and West Coast Main Line/direct Birmingham-Luton Airport arc.
·         Offer rail choice locally (A428) and regionally M1 (Northampton-Luton parallel) and Northampton-Bedford-Cambridge (should be part of East-West Rail) rail parallel end to end A45-A14 Northampton/M1-Felixstowe arc.
·         Revolutionise public transport between Bedford, Olney and Northampton, saving time, boosting frequency and integrated with local buses at Olney.
·         Would cut congestion into existing stations of Bedford and Milton Keynes and demand for parking/land use pressure.
·         Would bring footfall and spend to Bedford and Northampton traditional town centres
·         would link 4 airports (Gatwick, Luton, Coventry and Birmingham)
·         would provide a loop off the West Coast Main Line (Northampton-Bedford-Bletchley) allowing non-time-critical operations which in turn frees up paths and capacity to serve Milton Keynes Central
·         Northampton and points North West and Bedford and points south and east are growing population centres.
·         The volume of traffic and emissions overall is unacceptable. This rail link would help in providing much needed transport choice and cut congestion emissions long and short distances.

Studies have been done hitherto: Handley Report 2001, LSMMMS 2003, Capita Symonds 2004, Laurence Gregory 2004 – all favourable. Route hasn’t been protected very well, blockages at Olney and road threats at Northampton. Needs a champion, backer and agency home. It, with East-West Rail offers more scope to break the roads for everything monopoly from conception to assumption, from design and planning to practical readiness for courting what may be on offer. It is lamentable that lack-lustre performance of Marston Vale units inform unreliability giving a diminished impression and experience of rail when we’re trying to promote a positive image. We know of no one agent seeking pro-actively to foster conditions for line-born freight and Forders Sidings and Bletchley depot lie idle and everything seems postponed for future-future, when need is now and retrospectively. This brings some disillusionment to all but the hardiest of enthusiasts who want more freight to go by rail and believe rail to be better for the land use and environment. Local Councils tend to say they cannot support Northampton-Bedford because they are stretched with East-West Rail whereas an integrated approach would see grades of interest and action informing a consumatory conclusion of real delivery and progress on an incremental scale. Getting a station at Retail Park, Kempston (population 18, 000+) would add considerably to footfall on local Marston Vale off peak services making the case for more and better frequency, Bank Holiday and Sunday services on what is marketed as a ‘leisure line’ and for work (localised commuting). The franchise system here seems to be being used against doing it ‘now’ and abates to 2021 before any improvement can be done, which is rigid and inflexible and doesn’t do justice to hitherto studies making the case (Steer Davis Gleave circa 2000/2001) which said the Retail Station would add 100 extra passengers off peak per day to Marston Vales service – part of East-West Rail.
2. Bedford-Sandy-Cambridge: Part of East-West rail yet blockages and debates on exact route abound amidst walls of silence. We interpret traditional as Bedford-Sandy-Cambridge. This needs to be confirmed and the following ironed out:

Bedford/Bedford St John’s
Will a triangle be reinstated at St John’s? The old station is constrained to just 4 coach length trains as London Road Bridge blocks expansion eastwards. The inner route demands trains go into Bedford Midland and out again. Will we be able to sustain 1984 St John’s Halt and reopen the old St John’s? Nothing here is straight-forward and we’re keen to see a design specification from the Consortium spelling out how they intend to tackle these issues. The 1984 St John’s Halt would have to be slightly modified to accommodate the curve into St John’s and a group seems entrenched against any changes or accommodation?
Cardington Road
Here the old bridge was swept away and a dual carriageway inserted for Tesco. However you could insert single carriageway fanning out to two east of the railway theatre. However, level crossings are unpopular and making a road bridge given the close proximity of Longholme Way - Rope Walk junction and roundabout, makes the road bridge idea prohibitive. A level crossing would be cheaper than bridges and less intrusive. The other factor is that a Sandy-Bedford rail link could be creaming off traffic along the A603 and cuts queues anyway.
Willington
Some have added to their gardens across the old trackbed, Danes Camp bestrides the course of old railway, it is a narrow gap hedged in by the lapping waters of the River Great Ouse. Before you approach Willington, you have the spectrum of a rowing lake and development being threatened to be resurrected as a scuppering technique. Scuppering by default as the training lake rules out an island pillar for the railway to bridge the lake and thus rules out the railway. Outer routes have their blockages especially between Cople and Willington for example and linking with the Midland Main Line even at a Wixams Station, then denies Bedford Town Centre.
Blunham
Housing estate blocks old trackbed and old station site. Realignment would require using some land which is currently a garden centre cum agriculture. Realignment then has to cross diagonally over the old River Ivel Bridge and fit in the Sustrans Cycleway. In-keeping landscape practise means that high gradient viaducts may not be in-keeping and so getting the railway through this pinch point remains an issue.
Sandy
If you go around Blunham to the north of modern built Sandy, you then have a huge curve to swing back over or under the East Coast Main Line, into Sandy and beyond. Old route via Potton and Gamlingay is blocked and so a railway bypass or new route would be required. This means virgin soils or new blockages have to be tackled and destination Cambridge could help determine best route.
Shepreth v Trumpington
If, as proposed the new railway links up at Shepreth, you have to share twin tracks to Shepreth Junction; then share just 3 tracks with the Bishops Stortford lines into Cambridge, through Cambridge to Norwich and Ipswich respectively. To enter Cambridge by the former Trumpington Junction requires either slewing the road space or cut and covering the Guided Busway; and things like bridging the M11, clearing a track through the Trumpington Park and Ride where a new halt could link road, bus interchange and rail.























































I submit these two as main considerations and would also like to draw your attention to our Campaigns page which has many other schemes we endorse for further study and assessment. Local Government is strapped for cash, LEP too remote – never answers our emails and letters – and parishes like Olney seem bent on development and dismiss the railway restoration as pie in the sky – but that locks into oil/road/car/lorry reliance and Olney gets via the A509 Milton Keynes radial artery, more than its fair share of traffic and should ideally be rail served and bypassed. Our campaigns page is: https://ertarail.com/campaigns/

I attach a copy of the Handley alignment which shows how a new rail route could have been done to correct existing alignment blockages. Alas, due to nil support and a lack of resources, a new alignment would have to be studied by a qualified consultant. We just lack £30, 000.

I trust this submission accords with what you wish and we remain interested to engage any way we may within reasonable time and resource thresholds.

Yours faithfully,


Richard Pill
ERTA Principal Officer

Wednesday, 1 February 2017

Help save Bedford's Buses



Our approach is the more the merrier and a growing membership helps to underscore our representative baseline - that we are not just a bunch of amateurs or enthusiasts but are doing 'good work' advocating and championing better public transport. 

Professionalisation: Some professionals get insider information, the briefings and so know what's going or not going on. Outsiders like us do not get such direct sourced information and so are often left to second guess, using our experiences as public transport users, our ears, eyes and general consensus and observations. Some times we get it right, other times we meet a wall of silence or denial.

Cllr Notebook: 

Bedford Town Centre: Like many towns across the English Regions, Bedford has more than its fair share of closed shops. The pattern has been that where buses, which drop off dollops of people (footfall and potential spend) have been withdrawn over the years traffic congestion has grown to fill the capacity available and patterns of footfall have changed to where the buses still go. Thus we have no less than 4-5 different and regular buses along Union Street per hour and nothing along the Tavistock Street, Harpur Street North, High Street, Prebend Street and scant still linking the railway station with the bus station, which is a good 10 minute walk through un-desirable area with uneven footpaths, useless for bags on wheels for example, wheelchairs and buggies, let alone cycling with parked cars, free-for-all junctions and hazardous corners and layouts. In short Alexandra place and Woburn Road should both be made one-way, Alexandra Road an Conduit Road, made one-way towards Bromham Road. Contra flow cycle lane bi-directional should be installed and drive-ways made congruent to the main pavement/pathway to and from town centre and railway station from Greyfriars. Too many cars turning too many directions makes for hazardous negotiations. Not all is daylight and politeness, cold, wet, moody and miserable exists on any menu as well.

Restoring buses: The No. 7 has competition coming into Bedford along Kimbolton Road with Grant Palmer buses heading for another part of the exact same bus station. Now rather than go St Peter's - Dame Alice Street-Hassett Street, the distributor role given No. 7's are small buses could be to turn into High Street, stops either side of the Mill Street lights (make Mill Street one way towards High Street and no left turn from High Street but contra cycle lane for bi-directional use - currently it is chaos and hazardous for pedestrians and a free-for-all car/direction 'me first' sort of atmosphere and attitude drive-wise, especially now we have taxi/car hire vehicles swarming the area. No.7 could wrap around at St Paul's Square - Horne Lane and on-to Bus Station and back out again as now. Grant Palmer Buses need to have timetable and numbers which stop (officially?) outside Pizzaland in St Peter's Street so passengers can deduce what stops there and ideally the X5 would still stop there as it does across the road albeit dropping off only. Someone said like Park and Ride, differential rules/laws governing the number of stops these services can make vary and that prohibits the placing of them. Given it is a mile from Bus Station to the Polhill X5 stop, surely the stop adjacent to the Quarry Theatre would be desirable? Yet this bus shelter which has a contract to clean and maintain it, still sports the Bedfordshire bus stop sign and has no timetables published in it. It never gets vandalised but why waste money on a bus shelter if no passengers are to be permitted to access buses or coaches from it = daft and a missed opportunity. Yes, No. 7's would use more derve and take a little longer, but given so many get off at St Peter's and walk to High Street, quite a few with this distributor role would get off around the town, bringing the vital feed of footfall and spend, small, regular dollops of people. Likewise No. 7 bus users have suffered since the cutting back to half hourly with standing room only coming out of the town whilst Grant Palmer equivalent Kimbolton Road destination buses including the No. 28, have half dozen users at most from a separate loading at the Bus Station. 

So people come into Bus Station by whatever, but only determined and specific Grant Palmer users are loading to go northwards, the No. 7 for local access is taking the brunt on probably increases in usage. On a Sunday it is hourly and has a larger bus - so it can do the roads it uses - so we either need a bigger bus like No. 5's or restored 3 per hour (20 minute) frequency to ease over crowding. Again weekdays it runs up to 9.30pm ish at night and that last bus is scantily used as most shops and the town centre is all done by 6pm with just commuters and so on left. Surely outward No. 7's like No. 6's could run out via the railway station and do back along Bromham Road, Harpur Street North and call at Pizzaland Bus Stop instead? Any St Paul's late stragglers could walk to St Peter's or catch a No. 5 which links at Church Lane with No. 7's anyway and work back from there or have uniform cut off let's say 9pm and run No. 10's onwards and outwards via St Paul's wrap around, Horne Lane, River Street-Midland Road, Railway Station and home via Bromham Road and Union Street. All commuters pay the same tickets, so should have buses at peak times to all parts of Bedford and more wrapping around during the day like UNO buses would be useful especially if a new bus stop to serve the shops and offices around Wyvern House in Bromham Road had a new bus stop inserted. It is only a flag, but gives more options. If no.7 buses go Church Lane-Elliott Crescent (new stop by Spinney)-Putnoe Street returning to the town, they don't need to double back on themselves which would save derve for the distributor role via High Street and St Paul's Square/Horne Lane and Bus Station.

Milton Keynes creep: Bedford is growing, it is sprawling. We have the town centre, parts not served by buses. Railway Station-Bus Station-Nat West/High Street is a good 20 minute walk and no direct bus link. Retail Park Kempston does have buses but vastly more vehicles than space for parking and like with Lidls in Lurke Street, queues trail back to junctions blocking other road users and making hazardous conditions for pedestrians.

Castle Road cluster of shops and the Goldington - the spread is not geared to pedestrian, marginally cycling and mainly built design-wise around the accessibility, ease and convenience of car use. Bushmead - Howbury Street should be made one way except for buses and cyclists and ideally pavements widened with trees and benches to inform a kind of 'square' at the centre of the village feel of small shops and coffee outlets. It has been said "you can buy a skinny latte from Castle Road, but thanks to closure of the Post Office, no longer send a parcel and stamp access is patchy." 

Council must get real with people about these trends and seek rectifying and encourage people out of cars and onto public transport, cycling and walking at every turn and Milton Keynes like-wise if they have any sense and know what's good for the environment, let alone care.

These patterns are across other towns also. Bicester is compensated by being adjacent to the M40 and having 2 main-line railways, pity Witney where new development like the Bedford North River Development was juxtaposed with a cinema but what happened was early shift to the new venue was at expense of shops located in High Street and elsewhere and so not only did the new development have vacant properties, so did the High Street (traditional areas) too. In short it did not generate sufficient new to make real robust growth. Bicester has empty shops because the new development from bus station to High Street attracts the lion's share whereas south behind Sainsbury's to the Market Square has insufficient footfall and spend and many empty spaces. Road-side footpath from Bicester Village Station to town centre via Market Square is rough, poor quality and no dedicated cycle lanes last time I looked. It is key to sort out to optimise new flows of customers. Northampton has the A43, A45 and M1 in the urban cordon but lacks places for parking, is full of congestion and unless the conundrum of getting over London Road/Bridge Street can be resolved by a pro-action consortium, has it's traffic issues locked in with growth and a dying town centre with empty shops and lowering footfalls and spend. Rail delivers bulk. That is why the Retail Park Rail Station on the Bedford-Bletchley railway is so crucial to sort as it would bridge between Retail Park and Town Centre, arcingly and inform new flows off road of footfall and spend, which helps to sustain businesses. 

East-West Rail will boost East Bedfordshire if delivered integratedly and in a timely manner. We want spades on the ground sooner than later and £10 million to draw a line of intent on a map to say where the railway will go gets many dismayed when the need for these links is now, we've waited 20 years. Surely the £27 million + given everyone says they are short of money, should cancel yet another road scheme and divide the money between councils who have sponsored studies galore to get it recognised by Government 'making the case' to compensate their coffers and keep front-line services going including coordinated and integrated public transport. No, we do not have all the answers, but we would be failing in our duty not to pass on some solutions! If Councils do not listen or include, we can't help that, but to the ballot box they will be judged whether post bypass they do have a more benevolent pedestrian, public transport and cycling safer accessibility strategy or are just gimmicking pandering ever more to popularism and that symbolized in locked-in car dependency and exhaust pollution which backs us into a counsel of despair in some cases. We can be better, we achieve more when we work together. Thank you.

Finally, if anyone is prepared to be-friend our association and help us get a noticeboard access at Bedford and/or Richmond or Northampton or whatever like other rail user groups, please let us know. We don't seek special favours, just equality. We feel somewhat ostracised currently and that goes against the public interest surely?

If you agree, please write to: Bedford Borough Council, Cauldwell Street, Bedford, MK42 9AP and Mr Richard Fuller MP for Bedford and Kempston, c/o House of Commons, Westminster, London, SW1A 0AA. You can also join ERTA and help us help you and others together: https://ertarail.com/membership/

Yours sincerely,



Richard Pill
ERTA Principal Transport Officer.