Friday, 21 November 2025

East-West Rail Northampton must have rails east too!

 Northampton is central to the heart of England. It is a major logistics centre. It has many well-attended sporting outlets (Rugby, Cricket, Football) as does Bedford (Rugby, Rowing and Athletics)! Northampton has a population growing upwards of a 250, 000 catchment. It will ultimately have access to the Milton Keynes/Bletchley to Oxford corridor and vice versa.

However 2 aspects need a consistent coalition to be built and take up the baton:
1. Northampton-Bedford/Cambridge synergies. Needs updated studies including business cases, engineering aspects, new route avoiding built-up Olney with a new Park and Ride Station for Brackmills and A428/A509 interfaces and access into existing rails and networks at both Northampton and Bedford ends. East-West Rail proposes a rail route North of Bedford to the East for Cambridge and wider East Anglia and those audiences to Bedford and onwards to Oxford and vice versa. Suitability for freight (revenue) is yet to be determined. Northampton currently will have no direct rail link to this Bedford-Cambridge rail line. It should! Northampton-Bedford would however, plug Northampton and the trajectory to the West Midlands direct to Bedford, Wixams new station for Universal Theme Park (courting 8-million people per year/opens 2031), Luton Airport, London St Pancras Eurostar and the wide South East Thameslink Rail Network and all those audiences to Northampton! What could it do (footfall and spend minus road traffic congestion and pollution?) and much more. It needs an updated study and new routing options determined. Then a coalition to bring key outlets and people together and move it towards both inclusion and delivery within a 10 year time-frame.
2. Northampton-Market Harborough for Leicester, East Midlands and beyond and those audiences to Northampton as well as a Cross Country rail route linking East Midlands say Nottingham, with Northampton, Milton Keynes Central, Bletchley for Oxford, Reading, Bristol and Cardiff and those audiences by rail, to Northampton, lifting congestion on the A43 for example and M1?
There surely must be something in it making it worth a study update and lobbying to get the government to demand designs for a new Bedford-Cambridge railway include a direct link from a Northampton to Bedford new rail link to onwards for Cambridge etc, ideally from day one?
That is what BRTA is seeking and is supporting. We welcome you to join us and help take the vision forward. Leadership and champions are called for please.
Thank you.

Yours sincerely,
Richard Pill

Wednesday, 12 November 2025

BRTA is saddened by recent developments regarding rail links east of Bedford.

24-11-25




20-11-25:

Also: https://www.bedfordindependent.co.uk/east-west-rail-plan-promises-new-bedford-station-hospital-hub-and-universal-ready-line-as-leaders-warn-big-questions-remain/

Does this mean eradication of a handful of halts like Aspley Guise and Millbrook and the end of the shuttle, which served them, to make way for semi-fast end-to-end Oxford-Cambridge passenger services and what of freight?

re: https://www.bedfordtoday.co.uk/news/transport/east-west-rail-latest-updates-new-multi-storey-car-park-to-be-accessed-via-bedfords-ford-end-road-5407817

Moving faster now, but some saying it is the result of consultation when our route was not put before the public in 2019! Unless we get a champion and see off encroachment threats, this steam-roller push seems it. However, how do we bring Northampton into the frame for Northampton-Cambridge linkages and Tempsford Interchange with physical rails for main north-south running to and from Bedford and Cambridge respectively? If new station West of Cambridge is okay, why not Newton Longville 'Bletchley West'? It is a growing catchment, Winslow okay for itself and Buckingham, but too far out for MK urban areas proliferation. Likewise BRTA wants the Claydon Parkway Station and the Aylesbury rail link for South Bucks - Milton Keynes and Northampton synergies. 
No good waiting until 2050, it needs factoring in now by design, as 10 years hence, development will consume land needed for rail access and linkages? 
There's more, but we need a champion or two to get these matters better appreciated where it counts. Email ceo@brtarail.com to be on our loop.

Update 19-11-2025

re: https://www.constructionenquirer.com/2025/11/19/6-7bn-east-west-rail-plan-ramped-up-in-design-rethink/

Concerns are:
1.  Kimberley College and Village at Stewartby, 150 users per day, will they be jeopardised for merged Kempston Hardwick and abolition of Stewartby Halt. A solution can be found, but no champions or asking our views yet.
2. Tempsford Interchange Station - over or under A1 Black Cat Roundabout, under or over Great River Ouse, duck-under ECML and nil connective tracks for Peterborough, Stevenage and East Beds direct to Bedford or Cambridge = a missed connective opportunity for passenger and freight.
3. No plans for bolt-on/integration with a new arm to Northampton. 2003 LSMMMS Study by Government included Northampton-Cambridge and Atkins study 2017 showed it was a good deal on timings and potential usage as part of a modern railway plus the freight - Northampton is a chief logistic centre with very poor radial rail links.
4. Nothing on arms to Ipswich and Norwich.
5. Nothing on the Aylesbury rail link and 
6. Nothing on Bedford Midland...silent as night! Plans have been produced of design however, we know this because we know someone who has seen them.
7. Development of 1000 houses west of Willington brings the curtain down on our preferred route to Tempsford from Bedford. That locks-in the Northern Route. If not flexible and adaptable; that cuts out rails potential reaches and ranges and throws growth to the roads, with locked-in congestion and pollution bloating NHS waiting lists. 
Otherwise good as far as it goes, but a time-line would also be welcome, so we know whether bets on 7 or 10 years for ribbon cutting is realistic, meanwhile any post 2031 Oxford-Bedford and Universal demand growth will need baying at Bedford Midland = a crunch time of where to put it all and what gives, what takes. Our option is perfectly do-able, but requires champions, political will and route protection strategies. So far, no local politicians has come to our aid on it, which betrays Bedford in terms of reach, range and scope. A railway is better than no-railway, but emergent railway is an end game for many of us and what will be, will be for a very long time for successive generations!

BRTA is saddened by recent developments regarding rail links east of Bedford.

re: https://www.bedfordindependent.co.uk/major-development-submitted-for-1000-homes-at-bedford-river-valley-park/

The British Regional Transport Association (BRTA) is concerned that its preferred rail route east of Bedford is under threat and lacks any notable champions coming forward to advocate for it despite best efforts.


From 1995-2017 it was agreed a new Bedford-Cambridge railway would go east of Bedford via the former St John’s Station area on the course of old railway. Then in 2019 the consultation on routes, abandoned the previous consensus and did not include it in the list of options for the public to engage with. The public gave support for a Northern Route E, because of the wish to link with the principal Bedford Midland Railway Station and go north and out via a new constructed rail route to Tempsford and onwards to Cambridge. 


The reasons for the abandonment of the previous ‘old’ route were:

  1. The old route is built on at Blunham and Sandy

  2. The Officer for Road and Rail (ORR) stipulated no new or reopened rail links would be able to have Level Crossings and would need flyovers or duck-under bridges.

BRTA believes this should be challenged with special dispensations where no other enablement to reopening can be done unless a level crossing is provided.

Alas, despite campaigning over many years, no champions have arisen from MP’s to Mayors to other leaders, and that lack of champions has left the rail route vulnerable. 

Indeed, the Bedford Borough Council did a study looking at 3 rail routes going east of Bedford and found BRTA’s route was viable and do-able given the caveats required. However, drift has meant default to the Northern Route and now 1000 houses west of Willington, Bedford will scupper the former rail route and lock-in the Northern Route which wants at least 60 houses demolished for an extra two tracks north of Bedford and faces engineering and costly challenges getting through Black Cat Roundabout on the A1 and over the River Great Ouse at Tempsford before ducking under the main north-south main line at Tempsford to go on to Cambridge.


BRTA is disappointed, BRTA CEO Richard Pill said “we are sleep walking into the Northern Rail Route and that will mean upheaval and take 10 years to build whenever permission is granted. Meanwhile the Bedford Midland Railway Station will need more tracks and platform provisions and a new passenger booking hall. Given Oxford-Bedford trains are due 2031, waiting another 8 years for the Bedford-Tempsford-Cambridge railway to be built, means sidings at Bedford for Oxford trains will be needed. Add to which, Universal’s 8-million visitors per year from 2031, will mean things are extremely busy. BRTA is sad our route is not being supported despite our many appeals and congestion looks set to get worse for years to come.”

See also our web page: https://brtarail.com/ewrail/







Tuesday, 11 November 2025

Redhill Rail Reform - It could bring enormous benefits to passengers and more freight by rail too!

Redhill, is the key location on South East Railway Network, where ‘reform’ with investment, could bring dividends to all rail users and more freight by rail too!
The British Regional Transport Association (BRTA) wants reform of Redhill on and part of the Brighton Main Line, which has had numerous suggestions for capacity enhancement. Closures, locked-in road dependency, and growth, leaving existing lines struggling to cope with demand as people want to vote with their feet and use better public transport.
Our diagram above, done by our excellent member Iain Sear, shows the principles of our intent to speed access to principal places at Redhill for people and goods. It does not show every track that exists, it is simplified to try and convey an idea… what if?!
 
We call for:
1.    Third Rail Electrification of the North Downs Line to enable East Croydon-Guildford and Reading Thameslink network growth and wrap around. That releases diesel stock for deployment elsewhere.
2.    The flyover idea would enable Channel Tunnel-Oxford and beyond freight and passenger trains orbiting London and linking with principal places like Birmingham, freeing up capacity on existing lines.
3.    Tonbridge-Gatwick and Brighton direct, shaving time off changing at Redhill would enable more trains and reduce messing around, overcrowding and link Kent with Sussex by rail.
4.    BRTA calls for organisations to form a coalition, pool talent and resources and study these ideas, the benefits and time savings, freeing up paths and enabling transformation of the areas rail services.
5.    If you support our calls, please add your voice to our membership: https://brtarail.com/become-a-member/
6.    Other schemes over the recent decades have been numerous: Lewes-Uckfield, Brighton Main Line Mark 2, and a late comer is to abolish the Gatwick Express and amalgamate serving Gatwick Airport, a growth area, into existing services, with more of them. BRTA is not necessarily against these schemes and some like Lewes – Uckfield, we have flagged up many times, but they all seem to flounder on hitches sadly.
7.    Our suggestion of a flyover at Redhill has been around since the time of the 1955 British Railways Modernisation Plan, which was only partly implemented, intended to save the railways, instead, led preludatively to the mass closures with modernisation was more often than not being made out of economies, not government investment, which went on more roads, sadly. Getting congestion off the roads by improving rail links and access, is a top priority for BRTA and we invite the public to email their MP’s in support of what we are tabling here: https://members.parliament.uk/members/commons?sort=1
BRTA holds forums around the South East to bring people together, for recruitment purposes and to delegate roles and responsibilities to local people to roll up their sleeves and help usher the agendas along!

If you share the agenda, help bring it about. Time is running out and you can make a real difference! Watch this space for progress updates! E. info@brtarail.com

Wednesday, 5 November 2025

Colne-Skipton reopening of a local rail link needed!

re: https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/25593825.cross-party-support-restoration-skipton-colne-line/?utm_term=Autofeed&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1762259415

It has long awaited, and deserves a chance and the full go-ahead. Does the government want sustainable growth and local-regional regeneration? Then reopening this rail link is the way to go. BRTA supports it, our Northern Area Rep cc'd here, is also instrumentally gathering and giving support. Please add your voice by writing to your local MP: https://members.parliament.uk/members/commons?sort=1 and add your voice to SELRAP - the group leading on campaigning for the local rail reopening. It makes absolute sense and should be a top 10 of such reinstatements in the North with others similarly nationwide including Wales and Scotland too.
See: https://www.selrap.org.uk/ and our campaigns pages for other area lists too (East Anglia to be done shortly): https://brtarail.com/our-campaigns/
Up-to-date news can be posted on our Blogspot: 
https://brtarailvolunteer.blogspot.com/ If you want more on your area/region, join, do something, make news and campaign towards delivery!