Wednesday 30 March 2022

ERTA Northern Area Rep articles for wider interest

 All Things Yorkshire!

Our Member Mr Chris Hyomes, gives us the load-down on all he’s been doing for rail causes in ‘God’s Own Country’!

 

Queensbury Tunnel - 2021 Round up

 

It's been another tumultuous year.

 

National Highways spent £2.8M erecting a plug below No.3 Shaft, rather than agreeing to the dewatering arrangement offered by the landowner which would have allowed RamArch/sprayed concrete strengthening to be installed at a fraction of the cost. The rent on the pumping station has still not been paid almost six years after the first instalment became due.

 

The work at No.3 Shaft was probably the most expensive and high-risk single project ever undertaken by the Historical Railways Estate, yet no formal progress reports were produced and practically no emails exchanged about it amongst their team. They have adopted a scorched-earth approach to record-keeping, demonstrating again just how disreputable the company is.

 

National Highways' technical report into options for reuse of the tunnel - no doubt contrived to blow repair out of the water - and Sustrans' draft study into the benefits of a cycle network connecting Bradford/Keighley to Halifax via the tunnel are being reviewed by Bradford Council.

 

"We are now starting work on understanding the inter-relationship between the technical report into the tunnel repair and the economic assessment by Sustrans in order that a holistic picture of the initial costs and benefits of a cycleway through the tunnel can be fully understood, as well as the on-going liabilities which could arise", says the Council.

 

There are pots of Government money for levelling-up and transforming cities which could provide funding for a cycle path through the tunnel. A route from Bradford city centre to Thornton - providing access to the existing Great Northern Railway Trail - is going ahead and Calderdale Council is looking to develop an active travel scheme from Halifax to Trinity Academy at Holmfield. A two-mile link through Queensbury Tunnel would connect these emerging networks either side of the hill.

 

The planning application for the tunnel's partial infilling still sits dormant on Bradford Council's planning portal; the objections currently stand at 7,772 - a huge number. With £7.8M of taxpayers' money frittered away on work that mostly wasn't necessary and serious reputational damage incurred as a result of its incompetence over the unpaid rent, we suspect National Highways will not be keen to return any time soon, but they are nothing if not full of surprises.

 

We'll let you know when there are developments to report. In the meantime, have a fabulous Christmas - as best as you can in the prevailing circumstances - and let's hope for a much better 2022.

Queensbury Tunnel extends for 1.4 miles beneath a ridge in the Pennine foothills of West Yorkshire. Halifax lies at its south end (2.5 miles), whilst Keighley is located to the north (7 miles) and Bradford to the east (4 miles).

The tunnel could help to establish a strategically important link within the emerging network of shared paths across the region, allowing a connecting route to be formed between the Aire and Calder valleys where paths are already under development, as well as a link into Bradford. The existing Great Northern Railway Trail would form part of that route. 

Minsters Rail Campaign

Reinstating the Beverley to York line

Hull and Beverley are linked with Market Weighton, Pocklington, Stamford Bridge and York by the increasingly congested A1079. The Minsters Rail Campaign believes that the former 32-mile Beverley to York “Minsters” rail line (closed in 1965), which branched off the existing Hull-Scarborough line at Beverley and served these places, should be reinstated. This will contribute substantially to the long-term economic and social future of the East Riding, improving public transport, reducing car dependency and encouraging sustainable development. It will also be an alternative link from Hull and the East Riding to the rest of the rail network, needed because the existing rail infrastructure serving Hull lacks resilience. Regionally, the line will contribute to the Government’s “Northern Powerhouse” initiative, improving east-west connectivity between East and North Yorkshire.

 

Following their successful bid to the Restoring Your Railways Fund earlier in the year, The Minsters Rail Campaign are working towards a Strategic Outline Business Case for submission to the Department of Transport in February 2022.  Assistance is being given by infrastructure consultants Aecom and the East Riding of Yorkshire Council in compiling the case for reinstatement, with cross-party support from Members of Parliament in York and Hull. The Campaign is confident that the line will meet all the criteria required for reinstatement and the benefits for the region will be significant and far-ranging. 

  

SELRAP (Skipton-East Lancashire Rail Action Partnership)

Update on the Current Situation with Our Campaign

 

The Airedale line is a modern and fast train service running from Leeds and terminating at Skipton.

SELRAP's proposal is to extend this by reopening the closed railway line from Skipton to Colne, this will allow passengers from East Lancashire to travel directly into Leeds in less than 60 minutes.

This proposal is supported by Arriva Northern Trains and Skipton Building Society, who both recognise that it will open up employment, educational and leisure opportunities throughout Lancashire and Yorkshire.

It also allows the possibility of a direct link to Manchester airport from points from Shipley to Skipton.

 

The aim at present is to progress the project which is within the ‘Develop’ phase of the Rail Network Enhancement Pipeline (RNEP).

A critical engineering study was endorsed by DfT ministers 6 months ago but has apparently being ‘blocked’ from going ahead on the grounds that the Skipton to Colne rail reopening proposals are now deemed to be too expensive. They have done this without the evidence to back it up.

This assumption has been made in advance of this critical engineering study that would have determined on the ground the practicalities for the scheme and its final cost to be built.

SELRAP are contacting local MPs, the rail and transport ministers plus other supporters to try to get this study carried out.

The reopening of this line is essential in helping to ‘level up’ East Lancashire which has some of the most deprived communities in the UK. It would bring social and economic regenerative benefits to them.

Boris Johnson himself stated that ‘we’re going to unite and level up across the country’ whilst also talking about ‘building back better’!

Please visit our website for further information www.selrap.org.uk

You can also view there a promotional video made last year about the benefits of reopening the line. For any further information, questions or comments, please send to chris.hyomes@hotmail.co.uk

ED. We thank Mr Chris Hyomes for these articles and very much hope we will have more news from ‘up north’ in coming editions of our newsletter. Suffice to say “Woodhead… bring-it-on!!


To make common cause, enquiries or give support, please contact ERTA Northern/Yorkshire Area Rep:

Mr Chris Hyomes
10 Tythe Barn Road, Knottingley, West Yorkshire, WF11 9BU
T. 07971766207

Tuesday 29 March 2022

ERTA Dates, Times and Meetings 2022

These are goals we have, but are subject to revision. Please check with us in any case or join our free email loop: richard.erta@gmail.com

2022 Programme

ERTA Stall at Bedford Antiques & Collectables Fair – Saturday 2nd April 10am – 3:30pm
St. Paul’s Church, St. Paul’s Square, Bedford MK40 1SQ
Admission £1.50

Please visit the ERTA stall and show your support. Thank you.

Aylesbury Forum: Saturday 9th April 2022, 1pm food, 2-4pm business
The Bell, 40 Market Square, Aylesbury, Bucks. HP20 1TX T. 01296-388080
https://www.jdwetherspoon.com/pubs/all-pubs/england/buckinghamshire/the-bell
Agenda: 
Agenda for Aylesbury Forum 09-04-22

ERTA Ampthill and Flitwick Forum: Saturday 30 April 2022, 1pm food, 2-4pm business
The Swan Pub, 1 Dunstable Road, Bedford MK45 1HP
T: 01525 754777 E: steph@theswanflitwick.co.uk
It is adjacent to the Thameslink served railway station and with ample parking and bus links too.
https://www.swaninnflitwick.co.uk/menus/
 Agenda: 
Agenda for Ampthill Flitwick Forum 30-04-22
Station example: 
Click Here

ERTA Stall at Bedford Antiques & Collectables Fair – Saturday 7th May 10am – 3:30pm
St. Paul’s Church, St. Paul’s Square, Bedford MK40 1SQ
Admission £1.50

Please visit the ERTA stall and show your support. Thank you.

Leicester Forum – Saturday 14th May 2pm food, 3pm-5pm business

The High Cross,103-105 High Street, Leicester, LE1 4JB T. 0116-251-9218
https://www.jdwetherspoon.com/pubs/all-pubs/england/leicestershire/the-high-cross-leicester
Enquiries and expressions of interest via E. richard.erta@gmail.com
NOTE: Table bookings are not taken. We tend to sit towards the back area or out in the rear courtyard if weather clement and venue busy. Let us know if you are coming beforehand.

ERTA Stall at Bedford Antiques & Collectables Fair – Saturday 4 June 10am – 3:30pm
St. Paul’s Church, St. Paul’s Square, Bedford MK40 1SQ
Admission £1.50

Please visit the ERTA stall and show your support. Thank you.

Bedford Forum – Thursday 16 June 2022 1pm food, 2-4pm business

Pilgrim’s Progress, 42 Midland Road, Bedford, Beds.MK40 1QB

https://www.jdwetherspoon.com/pubs/all-pubs/england/bedfordshire/the-pilgrims-progress-bedford

ERTA Stall at Bedford Antiques & Collectables Fair – Saturday 2 July 10am – 3:30pm
St. Paul’s Church, St. Paul’s Square, Bedford MK40 1SQ
Admission £1.50

Please visit the ERTA stall and show your support. Thank you.

·                    We welcome offers of support, assistance and ‘light touch’ volunteering.

·                    Please make yourself known to us, join ERTA and find your niche/new calling!

Rugby Forum – Saturday 9 July 2pm food, 3pm -5pm business

Rupert Brooke, 8-10 Castle Street, Rugby, Warks. CV21 2TP

https://www.jdwetherspoon.com/pubs/all-pubs/england/warwickshire/rupert-brooke-rugby

London Forum – Saturday 13 August 2pm food, 3pm-pm business

Barrel Vault, Unit 23, St Pancras International Station, Pancras Road, London N1C 4QP.

https://www.jdwetherspoon.com/pubs/all-pubs/england/london/the-barrel-vault-st-pancras

NOTE: Table bookings are not taken

Berkhamsted Meeting – Saturday 24 September 12pm food, 2-3pm Members Meeting, 3pm - 5pm Public Meeting with Speakers. Venue https://www.stpetersberkhamsted.org.uk/heritage/court-house/ St Peters Court House, St Peter's Great Berkhamsted, Church Lane, BERKHAMSTED, Hertfordshire, HP4 2AX

https://www.stpetersberkhamsted.org.uk/about/courthouse/

Lunch at Wetherspoons the Crown, 145 High Street, Berkhamsted, Herts. HP4 3HH

https://www.jdwetherspoon.com/pubs/all-pubs/england/hertfordshire/ the-crown-berkhamsted

Station Stalls and leafleting helpers wanted! 2022

Email Simon Barber for details and offers to assist: simon4barber@gmail.com

Notes for Physical Meetings:
1. Subject to verification. Venues may change or be cancelled at short notice. Stay in touch.
2. People attend at their own risk. Everyone pays for their own food and drink.
3. There is a pre-pared agenda, please help focus on the pertinent issues

Main contact and convenor: Mr Simon Barber, 20 Fitzherbert House, Kingsmead, Richmond, Surrey, TW10 6HT T. 0208 940 4399, E. simon4barber@gmail.com

Monday 28 March 2022

Horsham Public Meeting News and Notes 26-03-2022




Horsham Public Meeting 26-03-2020 – notes by Richard Pill

Some 17 people attended the ERTA tabled Public Meeting on Saturday 26th March at the Unitarian Hall in Horsham adjacent to the central bus station. Colin Crawford chaired the meeting, whilst the Enticotts did refreshments and Richard Pill manned the book stall.

In what was a ‘not know who will come’ we were pleased to find those who came were of a congenial nature. The one cyclist who turned up was one of our speakers, Mr George Bathurst on the Windsor link. Engineering work on the railways had delayed some trying to get to the meeting, whilst others were more local.

Colin opened the meeting and gave an overview of the canal threat to the old trackbed between part of the former Guildford-Horsham railway and it may still come to an appeal. It stands however thrown out on a technical issue making the presiding council having to re-issue consultation and consider wider opinion. A point is that the canal has other routing options, the railway is not so lucky and needs the corridor of the former track-bed to go on with a broadening to accommodate a fenced off cycle-way and foot-way alongside, hence the idea of a ‘green corridor’.

ERTA supports the concept idea of the railway, in modern transit form, being reinstated as a local link. Rail links are connected to a wider rail network and integrally can carry local and wider regional people and goods off local and regional roads like no other comparable transport mode can, cutting emissions, parking issues and other negative pressures too much traffic on roads can bring.

The way ahead is technically fairly mapped out:

1. Get councils and MPs to support the idea and they in turn are better placed and connected to court potential sponsors and funding to commission studies beit business cases, engineering considerations, deviations or relocations where blockages exist and incrementally, starting maybe with Guildford Horsham as Phase 1 via Cranleigh and Phase 2 both the Arundel Curve and Horsham – Shoreham being implemented. This would allow Reading – Brighton direct and as well as Heathrow-Gatwick via Three Bridges.

2. Once formal studies are done and show ‘can/what’ can be done, then to turn to Government for support, more funding and ultimately go-ahead for delivery.

3. All ERTA can aspire to do is court support including from the public and encourage people to join ERTA, build a group and they in turn take on to involve and make representation to MP’s and Councils – who gets there first wins!

4. On timings, at one extreme East-West Rail between Oxford-Bedford-Cambridge has taken 35 years and still is not fully delivered, whereas others like the Borders Railway which has been successful as has other rail links like Ebbw Vale in Wales, been delivered relatively quicker. Many variables and politics can all play a part, as can public pressure and determination for a local rail alternative solution to current trends.

Questions and comments were on land use, state of local roads and the need for a through rail route to optimise usefulness. Previous studies were largely confined to a terminal branch between Guildford and Cranleigh, not Horsham, on that basis Surrey County Council have declared they do not support the rail scheme as no case. Cranleigh needs careful studying to see how sensitively a railway can be implemented either with a deviation and relocation mixture or a new bypass to the west and a new station in the vicinity. The gains of the railway would, on and off the tracks, prove its worth to local areas and wider ends socially, economically and environmentally. Given growth, given trends of local traffic, travel, congestion and much more, the rail link is a vital resource going forward, but this needs to be better appreciated at the heart of the political system, MP’s, Councils and Government. The model and dynamic involve could be repeated elsewhere nationwide.

The blocking of the route like at Southwater/Steyning and elsewhere has to be balanced going forward with growing population and no public transport infrastructure able to modal shift people and/or goods by rail in critical corridors like Guildford-Horsham-Shoreham (Reading-South Coast direct and vice versa/not via London) is. It was noted the Brighton Main Line is reaching capacity and needs a relief line beit both Guildford-Horsham-Shoreham and some reinterpretation of a Lewes-Uckfield-Tunbridge Wells missing link as well, one on the eastern flank and our line, taking the western approaches. Brighton arguably the centre of both and radials thereof. Currently the gaps and legacy of closures remains damage done and needs rectifying. The needs have increased, not diminished and so on the social, economic and environmental fronts, personal, collective and structural, these gaps need re-railing.

Mr George Bathurst gave his talk next on what was needed to plug a 300-metre gap between the Slough-Windsor rail link and that of Staines-Waterside Station. There’s been protracted highs and lows promoting the scheme. The backers set out to build the case and play by the system. However, the system seems to be cynical of rail and puts more conditions, costs and seeming blockage each time, one ticks a box. The scheme reached GRIP Level 2 out of an 8 step Network Rail ladder. The scheme takes on a 3-sided motorway cordon hedged in by M4, M25 and M3 and a population like Slough, which has grown from 30, 000 in 1980 to 200, 000 today and elsewhere similar trends means we need to use land carefully and rail generally takes less land pro rata of what it carries than trunk or motorway-style roads building does. The Windsor link makes a lot of sense and would better serve a top tourist centre and magnet and foster the town's well-being from a number of considerations.

The meeting finished at 16.00 hours and was congenial. We hope to repeat in the Autumn to continue to build and gather support for the rail link’s return! Join us.

Be on our loop/requests to richard.erta@gmail.com





Media coverage: We are only as good as our membership informs. Please consider joining ERTA and strengethen us to do more and better x nationwide. Enquiries to richard.erta@gmail.com https://www.sussexexpress.co.uk/news/people/new-plans-in-bid-to-reopen-disused-rail-links-at-guildford-horsham-and-shoreham-3634719

Wednesday 23 March 2022

Huge concern about TFL withdrawing from the Travelcard Agreement

To whom it may concern

I volunteered to bring this issue to your attention in regards to TfL's proposal to withdraw from the Travelcard Agreement.


You might have seen the recent TfL extraordinary funding and financing settlement letter dated 25 February 2022, the text says:

"Annex A – Fourth Funding Period deliverables
New revenue streams

To achieve this condition:

2. TfL will provide to DfT an impact assessment on different passenger groups of the withdrawal from the travelcard agreement prior to commencing with the withdrawal."


I've found the recent answer by the Mayor regarding the impact of withdrawing from the Travelcard Agreement, he only mentioned about the increasing use of PAYG due to hybrid working of many office workers.

https://www.london.gov.uk/questions/2022/0284


I find the answer quite confusing because he haven't mentioned about the minority of users who uses a paper One Day Travelcard (and weekly/monthly/annual Travelcard on Oyster) for various users including:

• Some people who don't own a Oyster and contactless card only rely on cash payments for paper tickets.
• Some people who are infrequent and occasional travellers to London and usually purchase a paper One Day Travelcard as part of their rail ticket from a station outside the Oyster/Travelcard zones.
• Some people (including domestic/foreign tourists, infrequent and occasional travellers) still don't understand the Oyster/Contactless PAYG system because of the requirement of touching in and out at stations. They prefer to use the paper One Day or Weekly Travelcard to reduce the confusion.
• Railcard users who get 1/3 off by purchasing a Day Travelcard because its hard for them to get 1/3 off on Oyster PAYG card and the Travelcard is more convenient.
• Disabled (including wheelchair) users who don't have Freedom pass or live outside of London where their free travel concession is restricted to buses only (and some are valid on their local train and tram services), this also include those who are not fond of the PAYG system as mentioned above. Disabled Railcard users (especially from outside of London) also purchase a One Day Travelcard as they get 1/3 off. Wheelchair users may have to take a longer journey (by going to another station and back) due to lack of facilities such as lift/ramp only on one side of the platform and could cause them to pay maximum fare on PAYG Oyster.
• Transport enthusiasts including people who do Tube Challenges. I did mention Geoff Marshall raised an issue on his Twitter (now deleted) about maximum fare on PAYG Oyster which is an issue for people trying to do Tube Challenges. He also raised the issue at the end of his YouTube video when he attempted to do 'The Most Out of Station Interchanges In One Journey'.


Retaining the paper One Day Travelcard will help reduce the burden on TfL's Oyster customer services because of maximum journey times causing them to get maximum fare as mentioned above.

Withdrawing from the Travelcard Agreement will create a two-tier system for non-Oyster and non-Contactless card users. Not only it will cause frustration and confusion, passengers who are not aware may end up getting fined by the Revenue Protection Inspectors on National Rail services in London.

I point out the Mayor stated on the Questions: "Ceasing participation in the Travelcard Agreement would mean that Transport for London (TfL) would stop selling Travelcards. It would also mean that Travelcards would no longer be valid for travel on TfL services."

Then I looked at the document of Consultation on The Mayor’s Budget for 2022-23 and it says: "...as well as the phasing out of the travelcard scheme on non-TfL services in London from sometime in 2023 (subject to appropriate impact assessment and consultation)."

page 117

I find the answer by the Mayor quite confusing because the statements are conflicting.

The words "subject to appropriate impact assessment and consultation" is also mentioned on the small text at the bottom left of TfL Budget Update paper for the 2 February 2022 TfL board meeting.

The text also says:
"Modifications to fares structure and ticketing:
◦ withdrawing from the Travelcard Agreement, which will require the support of HMG"

page 3


Here's the documents of the Travelcard Agreement:

1995 Travelcard Agreement (which mentions TfL's predessor London Regional Transport)


Travelcard Agreement, Through Ticketing (Non-Travelcard) Agreement and Clearance Agreement obtained by FOI request in May 2019.


You may need to submit a FOI request to TfL to obtain the latest Travelcard Agreement document.

The Travelcard Agreement with train operators is done commercially and with recommendation by the government as part of their franchise contracts.


I've done further research by reading the legislations and I believe there could be indirect legal protection of the Travelcard thanks to the Bus Services Act 2017?

Greater London Authority Act 1999

175 - Co-operation with the Strategic Rail Authority.

(1) It shall be the duty of Transport for London (either acting directly, or acting through a subsidiary) and the Secretary of State to co-operate with one another in the exercise and performance of their respective functions for the purpose -

(a) of co-ordinating the passenger transport services for persons travelling to, from and within Greater London -
(i) which are provided by Transport for London or any of its subsidiaries, and
(ii) which are provided under franchise agreements, or are secured services (within the meaning of Part 4 of the Railways Act 2005) provided by or on behalf of the Secretary of State ; and
(b) of securing or facilitating the duty of Transport for London under section 154(3) above;


Transport Act 2000 (with sections inserted by Bus Services Act 2017)

134C - Advanced ticketing schemes

(1) A local transport authority whose area is in England, or two or more such authorities acting jointly, may make a ticketing scheme (an "advanced ticketing scheme") covering the whole or any part of their area, or combined area, if they consider that the proposed scheme-
(a) would be in the interests of the public, and
(b) would contribute to the implementation of their local transport policies.

(4) The descriptions of tickets which may be covered by an advanced ticketing scheme are-
(d) tickets entitling the holder to make a journey, or more than one journey, involving both travel on one or more local services and travel by one or more connecting rail or tram services.

(5) A connecting rail or tram service, in relation to an advanced ticketing scheme, is a service for the carriage of passengers by railway or by tramway (or by both) which runs between-
(a) a station or stopping place at or in the vicinity of which local services stop and which serves any part of the area to which the ticketing scheme relates, and
(b) any other place.


135 - Joint and through ticketing schemes.

(1) A local transport authority, or two or more such authorities acting jointly, may make a ticketing scheme covering the whole or any part of their area, or combined area, if they consider that the proposed scheme-
(a) would be in the interests of the public, and
(b) would contribute to the implementation of their local transport policies
(but this is subject to subsection (1A)).

(4) The descriptions of tickets which may be covered by a ticketing scheme are-
(a) tickets entitling the holder to make more than one journey on particular local services or on local services of a class specified in the scheme (whether or not operated by the same person),
(b) tickets entitling the holder to make a particular journey on two or more local services (whether or not operated by the same person),
(d) tickets entitling the holder to make a journey, or more than one journey, involving both travel on one or more local services and travel by one or more connecting rail or tram services.

(5) A connecting rail or tram service, in relation to a ticketing scheme, is a service for the carriage of passengers by railway or by tramway (or by both) which runs between-
(a) a station or stopping place at or in the vicinity of which local services stop and which serves any part of the area to which the ticketing scheme relates, and
(b) any other place.


Although TfL is classified as a 'local authority', I believe the legislation applies to TfL because I've found one section which mentions 'London transport authorities'.

134D - Notice and consultation requirements

(1) If a local transport authority for an area in England, or two or more such authorities, propose to make an advanced ticketing scheme under section 134C, they must give notice of the proposed scheme in such manner as they consider appropriate for bringing it to the attention of persons in the area to which it relates.

(4) For the purpose of subsection (3)(c) the following are relevant local authorities-
(e) London transport authorities


In late 1994, the Secretary of State for Transport stated (with quoted text below the legislation) section 4 the Railways Act 1993 helped retained the London Travelcard as part of splitting British Railways to franchises operated by private companies.

Railways Act 1993

4 - General duties of the Secretary of State and the Office of Rail and Road

(1) The Office of Rail and Road shall have a duty to exercise the functions assigned or transferred to it under or by virtue of this Part or the Railways Act 2005 that are not safety functions in the manner which it considers best calculated—
(e) to promote measures designed to facilitate the making by passengers of journeys which involve use of the services of more than one passenger service operator;

(7) Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (e) of subsection (1) above, any arrangements for the issue and use of through tickets shall be regarded as a measure falling within that paragraph.


Written Answers: Post-Privatisation Services
Volume 250: debated on Tuesday 22 November 1994

Mr. Tyler

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what action he is taking to ensure the continued availability of through-tickets and travelcards after the privatisation of rail and bus services.

Mr. Watts

The continuation of through-ticketing after rail privatisation is ensured through provisions in section 4 of the Railways Act 1993. The Franchising Director will require franchisees to participate in multimodal travel schemes such as travelcard so long as he is satisfied that participation will result in no new net cost falling on his budget.The overall structure of fares and ticketing on London's buses will remain the responsibility of London Transport after privatisation, thus ensuring the continued availability of London travelcard. Outside London, bus operators are free to introduce multi-operator tickets so long as they do not amount to anti-competitive price fixing arrangements. Local authorities and passenger transport authorities also have powers to organise multi-operator travelcard.


By quoting these legislations, It would be interesting to see if this will lead to legal issues (including a potential legal challenge) for TfL, the Mayor and DfT? If anyone wishes to take legal action against them in attempt to save the Travelcard, good luck.

Brief note: By the way I'm not a lawyer nor qualified in legal profession, I'm only a researcher by reading through the legislation.

 

The legislation have enabled many areas in the UK to have their own 'Travelcard' ticketing (equivalent to One Day Travelcard) on multiple transport modes.

Bristol:
Freedom Travelpass
The Freedom Travelpass is a flexible ticket for unlimited train and bus travel within four zones.

Cornwall:
Ride Cornwall
The Ride Cornwall ticket gives you one day’s unlimited travel on all off peak rail and most bus services within Cornwall and between Cornwall and Plymouth (plus the Tamar Valley Line).

Liverpool:
Saveaway
If you make regular journeys using more than one type of public transport in Merseyside, we offer a one day ticket that could save you money off standard fares. Covering bus, train and ferry.

Manchester:
System One AnyBus, Train, & Tram (Off-peak)

Nottingham:
All buses, trams and trains in Nottingham (Robin Hood)

South Yorkshire:
SYConnect+ Day
This ticket gives you unlimited travel on all local bus, tram and train services within the South Yorkshire TravelMaster zone.

Tyne and Wear:

Network One Adult Day Rover

Get to where you want, when you want, how you want by bus, Metro, train or ferry


West Midlands:
Network - unlimited bus, train and tram travel

West Yorkshire
WY DaySaver Bus and Train (Off-Peak): £9.20 - Purchase via the MCard Mobile App or from a Bus Station Travel Centre or a Rail Station ticket office. Enjoy unlimited off-peak bus and train travel anywhere in West Yorkshire.  

Many more on National Rail website:

Therefore this will be completely unfair to have the One Day Travelcard removed for London as some areas have their own equivalent.

 

As we are recovering from the pandemic and the usage is increasing once again, with the upcoming fare rises which is very unpopular for passengers, I hope TfL will regain ground financially once again.

 

This is absolutely no solution for TfL and DfT in attempt to increase their revenue because withdrawing from the Travelcard Agreement will also be catastrophic for TfL's finances and the political reputation for the Mayor of London, especially from the South of London where most of the railway services are non-TfL. This is why the ticketing integration (especially paper) between TfL and National Rail must be retained at all costs.


I also hope their impact assessment will encourage DfT, TfL and the Mayor to decide against the proposal and retain the current Travelcard arrangement.

I hope the information helps and I wish you the very best of luck.

PS: I wish to remain anonymous, I've taken my own time to do my research and compile the information to bring the issue to your attention. Please share it to others if you can. Thanks

Response from richard.erta@gmail.com

Hi,

Thanks for looping me and associates in on this news and research, well done! At a time when we are being told to think 'green' and use public transport more contrast more on the roads, the Travelcard has and remains an invaluable tool in optimising travel options around the capital and ideally should be extended nationwide in concept, not abolished. Draconianism and the pushing us into cashless digitised cultures, disenfranchises swathes of the public not geared to it or who wish to keep options open, avoid unnecessary costs or new technology when the system works perfectly well without those changes being forced onto unwitting audiences. Indeed where I live there's a Day Rider at £6 and no return tickets apparently and other ticketing is above the Day Rider with singles still being sold as I heard discussed on the X5 Bedford-Oxford cross country bus link, was a coach with toilet and cycle accommodation, now double deckers with cycle and toilet withdrawn. 2.5 hours each way in the saddle takes some doing. I do hope Railfuture, CBT and other larger organisations take action and lobby for retention of the Travelcard, it is invaluable for a comprehensive day out minus the car and the freedom to roam for all pockets should be a human right, whereas I feel ever-more from 1960's closures to affordability agendas and digitalisation, masse audiences are being constrained and kettled to localism and mobility cordoned on cost, access or what is 'there' or not. For example there's a No. 41 bus which has only one out from Bedford to Northampton on a Sunday, so getting back is a problem. Two principal towns with 1.5 hours intervals Monday - Saturday departures and takes 1.5 hours to do the 21.5 miles as well. It begs who is really in charge and do they have a clue let alone a care for inclusion, equality and values of humanity, quality of life, choice and optimising the spread of footfall and spend minus the congestion on our roads and land use parking demand, land which could be used for other more productive things like employment, housing, conservation and farming for example. I wish you well and am disseminating as you intimate in the wider interest. Thank you.

We have a public meeting in Horsham on Saturday and any of your networks are welcome to attend and / or join ERTA and help us with our work as well.

Maybe you could do a small summary article for our July newsletter and/or attend our London Forums for liaison and networking?

Yours sincerely,


Richard Pill
ERTA Chairman

Actions:
1. Please write to your local MP: https://members.parliament.uk/members/commons
2. Join ERTA and consider being an assistant volunteer: https://ertarail.co.uk/become-a-member/