Saturday, 18 January 2025

Have your say and give support to improvements around the South West Main Line out of Waterlo!

This report should be of interest to all associated with the South West Main Line out of Waterloo.


BRTA would welcome for the South West Line a review, audit and study with options for the following:
1. Reinstate the direct curves at Yeovil, in particular the one allowing Weymouth-Exeter direct running for example.
2. Reopen the Lyme Regis Branch enabling commuting off the main line for resort and wider dynamic socio-economic and environmental appeal.
3. Upgrade electrification, double-tracking and signalling and
3. Have longer trains/upgrade stations and platforms
4. Satellite stations around Salisbury need studying as well.
5. What scope for more freight and line-born freight in particular?
If you agree write to your MP in support of the report (email!): https://members.parliament.uk/members/commons
This line has been allowed to be a back-water and vibrancy and a new engagement is required.
I also remind folks that our Westbury Forum can also discuss this and wider issues, date, place and times via my colleague Simon Barber, but May onwards is most likely and listing will be here: https://brtarail.com/events/
BRTA membership is open to all and ideally we need local area reps to help forward our agendas locally and convene pub sort of forums to join and come forward please. Local activism and campaigns often make a difference, but can be thankless tasks for getting the proverbial 'ball' rolling!
I am sure Simon is willing to table forums elsewhere providing costs or donations can be provided and offers of a speaker at a venue, if voluntary is welcome to entertain.

Friday, 17 January 2025

Road Building not the answer to proliferation of pollution and land guzzling! Choose the re-railing of Britain!

There's loads of evidence to suggest roads and proliferations thereof apart from land guzzling, increase traffic and emissions from exhausts, tyres, run-off into streams and more air pollution which affects people and communities in health hazard terms. So: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/01/15/britain-build-more-roads-hit-net-zero-infrastructure-tsar/ would seem erroneous to put it politely!

BRTA seeks to suggest the rtail alternative and our events are worth tapping into and supporting to enable us to gather more support and direct it to aid chances for support where it counts - with decision makers and investors.

I attach a recent diagram, which shows how making more out of the proposed Stansted Airport expansion, could and should mean more and better rail links to it, reuniting east and west Essex and bringing Haverhill into the frame.

Please give us your support and write/email your MP to that end.

Other news since last newsletter, is Neil O'Briend MP for Harborough area, has added his support to our N2MH Campaign and we hope all MP's along the line will do likewise. Thank you.






Wednesday, 15 January 2025

BRTA Ampthill-Flitwick Forum 12-03-2025 - All Welcome!

15-01-2025

We need membership and donations to fund a questionnaire to gauge interest and sow seeds of ideas for people to mull over and respond to. The meeting is open to all, so all welcome.

Both Flitwick and Ampthill Stations need support in different ways. Wixams is good for the vicinity and north thereof/south Bedford, but Ampthill would serve a 10 mile catchment of around 50, 000 people from M1.East Milton Keynes-A507-CentreParcs -A6 Wrest Park, Marston Vale (access to Luton and London, not east-west!) and all in between - a growing infill development with scant any improved infrastructure and dire parking/basic facilities.

It is the BRTA's view that things must improve and can do so and a new station 'Ampthill Parkway' could serve a niche and positive contribution. Relocation can be done and the Fordfield Road access prove a hand Park and Ride capacity enhancer. Meanwhile Flitwick gets more relief to congestion and air pollution whilst Ampthill Town could gain more sustainable flows of footfall and spend all-year-round from wider audiences.

Ampthill-Bedford and vice versa via Wixams for Universal Leisure Park would also boost Bedford Town Centre and connect to an east-west rail facility. Let's never lose sight that both areas are a part of Bedfordshire and our own county needs some sort of unity in cohesive rail infrastructure and join-up-ness. How is it councils can only deal with just one rail project per time, but multiple road schemes?

Arguably, splitting into 3 small unitaries was a mistake? One County-wide Unitary could have been more cohesive, now regional reform, could sweep away in all but name, whereas arcing local to regional if accessible and can inform positive traffic and air pollution reductions. 
We need your help and support please. Thank you.
Our Sandy Forum aims to tackle East Beds/West Anglia issues, please follow https://brtarail.com/events/


BRTA Ampthill-Flitwick Forum

Wednesday 12 March 1pm lunch; 2-4pm business
Venue: The Swan Pub (Side Lounge), 1 Dunstable Road, FLITWICK, Beds. MK45 1HP
Venue Phone: 01525 – 754777 (landline); 07944-044003 (mobile)

For further information please contact Simon Barber, 20 Fitzherbert House, Kingsmead, Richmond, Surrey TW10 6HT
Email address: 
simon4barber@gmail.com
Phone (landline): 020-8940-4399
Phone (mobile): 07522-374740

Agenda:

1.   Apologies for absence

2.   Notes of previous meeting and matters arising/feedback

3.   Ampthill Station:

a.   Need members and volunteers

b.   Need sponsorship of questionnaire flyer – 20 back so far, all in favour of the station but no new members but just one did join.

c.    Other questionnaires to gauge interest

d.   Resourcing an on-going seed-planting campaign

4.   Flitwick Station issues: disabled access, bridge crossing to The Swan, bus and cycleway links and any other related matters.

5.   Wixams Progress and implications

6.   Central Beds Council – need a Zoom Meeting

7.   Any Other Business

8.   Day, Date, Time, Place of next meeting.: suggest post 4th October unless anything major happens. Interim, full funding and delivery of the flyer is best seed-sowing activity alongside any formal representations.

https://brtarail.com/events/ and https://www.facebook.com/ReopenAmpthillStation 

Note: richard.brta@gmail.com to discuss further/join our loop. Attend meeting, donate, join, be willing to help, is exactly what we need please.

Sunday, 29 December 2024

Reopening local rails, we need a nationwide programme, not just a trickle!

I saw this and thought it may be of interest. They make the case well, which begs the question, why isn't it happening? 

https://yorkshirebylines.co.uk/region/reconnecting-the-north-the-case-for-reopening-the-skipton-colne-rail-line/ 

Please write to your MP and ask that government switches funding from new roads to reopening local rails more and informs modal shift for more people and goods by rail on the back of it. 

https://members.parliament.uk/members/commons and 

https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2018-06-06-pollution-cars-and-vans-costs-%C2%A36billion-year-health-damages

https://www.cravenherald.co.uk/opinion/opinion_leader/24839419.now-time-rebuild-skipton-colne-railway/

It should be the top priority for all serious people of the North, investors in localism and Government?!

and others: 

https://brtarail.com/our-campaigns/

Sunday, 24 November 2024

Guildford-Cranleigh-Horsham local-regional rail link needs your support

New Diagram - what we would like, really, really wish for!




Update at 07-12-24 North Downs Rail Corridor - making the most of an asset!

BRTA welcomes any information and inclusion in consultations regarding this and other rail lines in the area. Our feedback is as follows:
1. We regard rail as 'green' compared to aviation and roads-based solutions. It is often faster and every seat taken on a train is one less vehicle on the roads, helping reduce congestion, saving land use for endless parking demand and much more.
2. The North Downs Line has improved over recent decades and the introduction of semi fast services with fairly comfortable trains is innovative.
3. Our call is for a full third rail electrification, maybe in phases between Redhill and Guildford (one) and Guildford-Reading (two). This would enable additionally inclusion of Guildford and Reading in the Thameslink service network, offering a semi - fast service in addition to local stopper services and bring new flows of footfall and spend from South London/East Croydon to Guildford for example, rejuvenating footfall and spend in a town centre in a sustainable way.
4. We would welcome interest in our suggested rebuild of the former Guildford-Cranleigh-Horsham rail link to a modern rail standard to ease congestion on local roads, give more opportunities for rail travel, enable more trains to call at Guildford and go on to elsewhere, freeing platform access for other trains more, than idling. It needs route protection, coalition building, studying and working up - previous studies were based on a terminal branch, but apart from local feed and access to rail more, we see semi-fast links (new for rail) between Reading and beyond to Horsham, Gatwick and westwards via a new Arundel Curve to Shoreham (Portal/Resort) and Brighton and also Chichester and Portsmouth and between West London, Old Oak Common and Heathrow to the south (more routing capacity options) and vice versa, benefiting everyone in a sustainable way.

We welcome any interest or support and work with others to inform more and better for all. Thank you. 

Contact richard.brta@gmail.com to join our free email loop.


Dear All,

The British Regional Transport Association (BRTA) is a voluntary-based association and relies on a growing local-nationwide membership able to take local-regional responsibility to work together flexibly and compliantly with us to make progress with this much needed local rail link.

 

Nationwide and regionally, we should reasonably expect councils, regional bodies and central government to pick up on these opportunities and make progress and lead from the front. Instead we are highlighting them in the hope that key bodies and individuals can see the opportunity on and off the rail and work with us to bring it about. Good ideas and observation is not enough, we need collaboration and a joint effort to build the necessary coalitions, gather support and share the load and responsibility. BRTA has the power to facilitate, but it is local people upwards who have the ability to determine and push through this wonderful opportunity which will not last forever unless actions are taken now.

 

The following may be observed:

1.     BRTA is focusing on Guildford-Cranleigh-Horsham with an Arundel Curve for South Coast access to and from. If our effort is superseded by a larger body or campaign, they may do phases or a wide gamut with a new direct bridge over the Horsham-Arundel line and a new-build to Shoreham serving growing towns and populations between the two via the old route in addition to a curve for direct running into Horsham and on to the Arundel direction.

2.     Local commute and visitorship from and to Guildford, Cranleigh and Horsham as a local focus would be advantageous given our precious few resources.

3.     Regionally Reading and beyond to Brighton and Portsmouth respectively and a shuttle linking Gatwick-Three Bridges-Horsham-Guildford-Heathrow from the south, gives more flexibility.

4.     North Downs Line is not undermined, it is doing a roaring trade, but needs infill third rail electrification and Thameslinks from East Croydon to run semi-fast into Guildford and maybe extended to Reading as well. That in turn frees diesel units for strengthening and additional services elsewhere.

5.     Our AGM in July 2025 will be held at Guildford and we aim to have 2 principal speakers and all will be welcome to it.

6.     It is naïve to think ‘instant’ for such projects as this, they are incremental in a context of some hostility to notions of reopenings both within and outside the rail industry and government itself. For example the Office for Road and Rail (ORR) have a policy against local level crossings for reopenings, demanding expensive bridges and duck-unders for new-build. That puts costs up and is disproportionate when evidence exists to indicate that as long as roadside abuse and proper maintenance is done, level crossings 98% are a safe, cheap and useful alternative. Bridges get bashed and concrete can erode over time with concrete cancer. We need some balance and common sense here, otherwise costs spiral deterring good ideas and modal shift back to rail on the back of modal choice from local projects such as this.

7.     Please write/email to your MP’s and ask them to support BRTA where you live and encourage government likewise to review ORR’s policies and have a more case-by-case basis for assessing suitability of engineering local-regional conventional rail links and their designs. The nation stands to gain if we succeed! https://members.parliament.uk/members/commons 

Yours sincerely,

Richard Pill

BRTA CEO

richard.brta@gmail.com







Monday, 18 November 2024

East-West Rail, Consultation and controversy! Save the Marston Vales local halt stations and shuttle service!

New diagram 07-12-24

Update from Chris Wright with BRTA Bedford Area Rep Response: This email may not have reached you. Attachment now removed.

Some good news from Quainton Newsletter, although not sure of their sources. Also some notes in Mod Rlys 12/24

DfT working on a low cost option for Ay-MK

HS2 to rebuild route to Quainton Rd (other reports say EWR), 

N/Rail to rebuild embankment and line to Aylesbury. 60 mph (not 90) -required in Network Change order. Would double track if funded. 

Q/Rd are seeking for Q/Rd to be a stop (Earlier parish council were anti due to increased traffic in village and platform may need replacing with current standards). If only one track laid may allow Q/Rd to keep access to part of mainline. Lease ends in 2028/9. Joined both sides of their site in 12/24. Using mainline for Xmas trains.

MP Callum Anderson -MP for Buckingham and MKS in support and Greg Smith MP for Risborough now. I have written to Callum and he has asked me for more info. Also Lord Faulkner and Hendy of Heritage Rly Association, support

Modern Rlys (12/24) has report on HS2 in Bucks inc Calvert. N/Rail required to relay one track to Calvert -aim by 2028.
Also notes the Ox-Bristol service will have 2 more return trains on Saturdays from 12/24. 

BRTA Response:

Dear All,
FYI: Thank you! It just shows that having a rail link is better than none. Speed is a luxury, trains are quicker than roads in most cases anyway and are greener for what they carry than multiple individual vehicles plying the land! Hence our Willington option of bypassing the old route can be done but at a lower speed and 2 bridges across the River Great Ouse! Problem is:
1. EWRC Co are promoting one Northern Route with tweaks 'more or less tunnels', whereas what we wish for is ours and their routes put before the public, both equally worked up and as Mrs Thatcher once said "Let the people decide."
2. Our route would be better for passenger and freight.
3. It is only Bedford-Tempsford we are concerned about, no problem with the new route to Cambridge South!
4. EWR Co have met with everyone but BRTA/me.
5. Engagement with Bedford Borough is protracted, awaiting a round-table meeting, but again Befare gets there first.
6. Unless the opposition of Northern Route get behind our route proactively, work it up and put it before the public and new Secretary of State for Transport - Swindon South - then Bedford-Cambridge will either be strangled with development, be cancelled because of divisions or wither for want of a fully supported rail alternative.
7. Media black out here for BRTA in Bedford, as the media seem keen on Promoters/Officialdom and Opposition, not the third way option of a choice put before the people - our route was not included in 2019 consultation.
So, some good news and flexibility, but hard to convince and tackle Office for Road and Rail/ORR if a divided camp for 'special dispensation' for Priory Park entrance Level Crossing. Recent Storm Bert et al, would have closed the railway, but I have seen no intimation of bridge access into Priory were the railway reopened that way, even as Cardington Road could bridge the railway potentially.
On a personal note, my eyes are going bad, 2 operations in December, may limit what I can do in future. Pro BRTA route suggestion needs to be talking together, otherwise no rail defaults to bad air pollution, chronic congestion and a vacuum of footfall and spend to resuscitate the town centre.
Quainton news laudable, but should mean plenty of land for a Claydon Parkway Station akin to Winslow please?

Yours sincerely,

Richard Pill

BRTA CEO

I'm cutting and pasting here! 17-11-24

Latest plans for EWR published. Major organised opposition on Bedford -Cambridge section. Mush could have been reduced if N/Rail's proposal for extra platform on MML at Bedford had been accepted. Marston Vale line and Bicester? Sec of State at Bletchley today. OBRAC is not directly involved as is Oxford/Aylesbury focussed.

Stations could shut on part of East West Rail line

Image source,Network Rail

East West Rail is asking the public for its views on the project

 

Laura Foster

BBC News, Bedfordshire

  • Published   2 hours ago

A number of stations on the railway between Bletchley and Bedford could be closed under proposals for the East West Rail (EWR) line.

EWR said a number of stations may need to be consolidated or built to offer more services.

Trains only began running again on the Marston Vale line a year ago after a maintenance firm went bust.

A 10-week consultation on the plans,, external which could also see changes to stations in Bedford and more financial support for landowners, is under way.

EWR aims to create a railway connecting Oxford to Cambridge, via Milton Keynes and Bedford. The section between Oxford and Bletchley is due to open next year.

The project has been criticised by many local residents and politicians, but was given its backing by the government in the autumn Budget.

Transport Secretary Louise Haigh said: "More than £6bn in economic growth, 28,000 new jobs and tens of thousands of new homes are just some of the benefits East West Rail will deliver.

"Today marks a major milestone for the project as we encourage communities to have their say on this transformational line that will offer so much more than simply getting people from A to B."

Workers building the East West Rail line. The photo is taken from a bridge looking down at construction work, with diggers, gravel, tracks being laid and workers in hi-vis orange clothing.

The railway line is being built in sections over a number of years

 

Under the current proposals, there would be up to four trains per hour.

EWR said it expected them to run from 06:00-00:00 Monday - Thursday, from 06:00 - 01:00 on Fridays and Saturdays, and between 07:00 and 23:00 on Sundays.

Under the proposals, stations at Bedford and Bletchley would be upgraded, although Bedford St John's would be moved closer to the town's hospital - onto the former Midland Railway’s Bedford – Hitchin alignment.

But it could mean changes for the other stations on the Marston Vale Line. A new development at Stewartby (on the former brickworks site) and the Universal Studios proposal nearby at Kempston Hardwick, may also affect any likely station relocation proposaals.

Option one involves retaining the existing 12 stations in their current locations, but option two would mean building new combined stations.

Which ones would be closed and where the new ones would be built is not clear.

But EWR stated that changes to this section would provide "a three-fold increase in services and reduce journey times".

A map showing the different stops on the route from Oxford to Cambridge, including Bicester, Winslow, Bletchley, Milton Keynes, Bedford, Tempsford and Cambourne.

The line will provide a direct link between the university cities of Oxford and Cambridge

 

EWR said it would also be giving extra financial help to anyone whose land was affected via the proposals, in the form of "statutory blight provisions".

It said this was in addition to the Need to Sell Property Scheme, external, for people who have seen the value of their homes depreciate because of the proposals.

A survey held earlier this year suggested 75% of people in Bedford supported the rail project.

Martin Yemm, who lives in Chawston and represented a campaign group on the matter, was one of the people surveyed.

Speaking in February, he told the BBC: "I find time and time again that you make a comment, that is then misconstrued completely and you get given an answer to something totally different."

Proposals for the Cambridgeshire section of the route and options for the new station at Tempsford have also been announced.

The consultation on the updated proposals run for 10 weeks, from 14 November to 24 January.

You can take part online, external or attend one of the 16 drop-in events that are being held.


The BRTA Response:

BRTA is opposed to closure of any halts on the MVR LIne. We want to see the local shuttle retained and East-West Rail semi-fasts on the back of it, not instead! Likewise we want to see the local line electrified and then freight from Watford and beyond to Corby could be done with a single electric locomotive, bringing efficiencies. Indeed a 2001 study showed were an extra station at the Retail Park Kempston was added, an extra 100 passengers per day would be added boosting ticket sales. 1 hour end-to-end local shuttle, feeding in at both ends. On Oxford-Bletchley we want a Bletchley West/Newton Longville Station, a Claydon Parkway and Islip not to be closed, but fully integrated with fast and slow trains respectively. It must be a people, community and environment central to decision making and railway identity, not top-down superimposed. 

We are disappointed the Mayor of Bedford does not seem to be engaging with us nor singing with Richard Fuller MP for our route east of Bedford via St John's. That means tweaking around a single route north of Bedford, rather than giving people a choice of routes and allowing them to decide and politicians getting behind it. Some may think the BRTA view is wrong, but greater fantasy is a railway at any cost, steep gradients, expensive tunnels, rather than taking ORR to court and demanding special dispensation for one or two level crossings, which is hindering many local reopenings around the country?

We all need to rally to have a decent East-West Rail, but not throw away the shuttle between Bedford and Bletchley. Owen O'Neil says few are using it, can you not understand the constant casualty of driver shortages and bus substitutes at last minute notice, will deter relying on the train and dent figures? Please let's rally round and support our local railway being retained. 150 Kimberley College students per day need Stewartby right side of the village, Universal Theme Park for an upgraded Kempston Hardwick Station respectively, not merged near a busy access road with many lorry movements for youngsters to navigate?

I know some of us have had and do have our differences, but we do need a railway east-west and it is only Bedford-Tempsford which is disputed on route and practical grounds, not the idea as a whole. Andrew Long emailed me to say all rail groups wanted the Northern Route, but I dispute that when no alternative is being presented to the public since the 2019 consultation. Yet our route more or less was 'in' from 1995-2017! Please let me have your views. 
Please give us your support when responding to the consultation: https://eastwestrail.co.uk/consultation2024
Join our email loop for updates and other rail-based news: richard.brta@gmail.com




Thursday, 7 November 2024

Wales Rails Dilemma - needs to be given nationwide investment, growth and spread!

Update on 29-12-24:

https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/hope-of-reinstating-railways-in-west-wales-corridor-dashed-as-cost-estimate-hits-2bn-18-01-2024/ Media reports the news, but some media, not this one, reports disproportionately bad news on the railways (Sussex forr example) whilst seeing roads as 'normal' and not raising so many objections, picking on bad points and lauding rail = as we may wish!

In Wales, they don't have HS2, they are owed a share from that project as per Scotland and that should be used for restoring the West Wales rail link so more and existing lines get more all-year-round footfall and spend and easing road pressures, land use and urban congestion whilst regenerating local economies and employment prospects for all ages and none.

If interested:

1. write to your local MP: https://members.parliament.uk/members/commons

2. write/email your Welsh Assembly members: https://senedd.wales/

3. join BRTA as a member: https://brtarail.com/become-a-member/

4. Join our free email loop via richard.brta@gmail.com Everyone matters, so everyone can be involved in re-railing agenda push and shove roads to the margins as principal killers of land, environment, people and wildlife.

From 4th December 2024:

This effort to rouse a modicum of common sense here must be given support by all to have any chance. Consider the following:
1. The principle, it would link by rail, into one of the most tourist attractive places to visit in Wales and of international renown Caernarfon for example and 3 University sites, of which Lampeter is under threat, access and brown field demand being two, which rail could serve if the old route and station site is returned to railway use.
2. North Wales terminal Branch into Caernarfon and take on the constantly upgraded A487 trunk road and reduce more pressure on the A55. You get more roads and motorway designs if you do not restore or new-build a local rail alternative.
3. It would be new-build in some cases, so for example Aberystwyth, the old route went in from the north and reversed and had a circuitous route to the south, could a town bypass straight down be considered with an edge of town and Vale of Rheidol Railway with parking for multiple use access and help declutter Aberystwyth town centre?
4. Existing Cambrian lines have been subject to closures, pruning off feeder routes, beit Gobowen or Ruabon links, let alone Blaenau Ffestiniog to Bala! They have also been subject to decades of rationalisation, beit cutting out passing loops (capacity) and modernisation to automation brought savings, but little investment beyond newer trains but capacity on and off the rails is theykey critical issue, as overcrowding and inability to see out of a window in a pleasant environment, means deterrent to potential would-be rail users, which in turn sends a negative downward spiral, when the line is brimming with beauty, potential and could be doing a lot more all-year-round trade in these days of 'get it right and demand and supply is the name of the game'.
5. Doing nothing is not an option. I don't agree with Beeching ideas or Richard Bowker who was just short of saying 'close it' for Denton on the Stockport to Stalybridge railway for having the less well used station on the network. You get out what you put in. Run down, scant facilities, poor timetable on one hand, less well used brings a poor status on the other, when what analysis for identifying new markets, and improving trains, tracks, facilities and personal sense of security which incrementally may court more usage to a flow? We have seen stations where investment has informed more, closure, just puts rail out of the market and congestion stacks up with many negative consequences including poor public health?
6. Government has to decide which way to go, avoiding the fudge of 'all things to all people, but falling short of pleasing any but shareholders.' The Welsh Assembly needs a rota of places to meet like Cardiff, Machynlleth (Mid Wales)  and North Wales (Llandudno) or profiteering going out of industries.' All tiers of governance and transport responsibility need to consult the public, come up with nurturing use and demand and service it. In Switzerland they have special wrap-around windows for some scenic railways and good seating for example, courting audiences to enjoy the railway travel experience. But small-loads of post, pallets and parcels for example, could also have designed-in to normal stock - bring back the modern equivalent of the Guard's Van vestibule for example. But hauled specials, seasonal steam, good, regular normal timetables, can all add up to making the most of an environmentally friendly asset. 
7. Coming to Carmarthen - Bangor, yes £2 billion is not to be sneezed at, but would play out in rising usage and modal sustainability for decades if done. Weird how a railway professional was coaxed to suggest upgrading the A487 rather than reopening the West Wales Main Line, even though the railway could inform all-year-round footfall, visitorship and demand including hotel for individuals and family trade, not just walkers, nature lovers and campaign-hostelry sort of swathes. Horses for courses, we need a diverse demand to inform a diverse accommodation and visitorship all-year-round to make thriving places, free of congestion and land-use parking demands and able to inform sustained employment for all ages and diversify market demands, skills and what is on offer. I am not talking fast-food per se, but horses for courses of what gives, what takes, what suites all pockets and what all can buy into?

It took 65 years to get to where we are (following 1960's closures and car generations) and we have not the luxury of another 60 years to reverse or new-build out of it, roads do not cut congestion! We need incrementalism upwards, not downward spirals of myopia and thinking one example, Cardiff Metro, beacons and gas lights the rest of Wales by tokenism, rather we need even spreads based on getting places back on track. It is a challenge, but one which can raise the game for all, not just the few.

re: https://www.countytimes.co.uk/news/24699551.knighton-meeting-future-heart-wales-line/

1. This line has been deprived of upgrades and investment as per the Cambrian Network.
2. It could do more if upgraded with double track and through originating journeys starting like Swansea to Shrewbury and maybe onwards to Manchester Airport?
3. There is a feeling that The Welsh Assembly is Cardiff centric. Understandable from an electoral point of view, but other places suffer like Swansea by capacity into Cardiff and outwards - better rail links and options are needed.
Upgrading Heart of Wales line to a modern operational standard, means faster speeds/consistency and a diversity of all stopping trains and faster semi-fast principal end-to-end operations and routing freight too/looking at local sourced freight potential and not container views only, but smaller loads like post, parcels and pallets for example and designing rolling stock to do it all/be more versatile/bikes, prams, buggies and more!
4. Do stations need upgrade
- parking, coffee shops, post offices, utilising space and buildings, toilets, hotels for visitorship? It needs looking at study, scope and on-the-ground.

Maybe also a study of a Mid Wales rail link like Carmarthen - Aberystwyth (new build with modifications) to enable West Wales to be doing more business and also a link between Cambrian and Builth Wells with curves to link the lines for diverse audiences and better access. Cost? Yes, so build the coalitions and treat it like Cardiff Metro and realise unless a positive way forward can be hatched, models and grades of ideas can be adapted, closure could be a cost-laden result too? However, you have to see going forward with rail means less traffic on roads, less road upgrades (intrusion/land take), better preservation of rural tranquility and a more versatile balance?

How much of West Wales can sustain an all-year-round rail-based access hotel accommodation? Self catering, camping or top notch fine, but family hotel access seems lacking, has Barmouth got a hotel still? Is there a new-flow opportunity there? Access and timings are critical, but rail offers more than roads, but price and accessibility have to be balanced.
2. Email the 'Cardiff Centric' Welsh Assembly: https://senedd.wales/find-a-member-of-the-senedd/
Should they meet at Llandudno, Machynlleth and Swansea to get a better appreciation?!
Only by a growing membership, can BRTA resource financially and humanly, getting more and better. It needs us all to work together, to make the breakthroughs more. If you wish to be emailed on Welsh rail matters and forums, please send to richard.brta@gmail.com