Friday, 28 November 2025

Urgent need for a rail corridor alternative

 re: https://www.dgwgo.com/dumfries-galloway-news/new-a75-bypass-must-be-a-dual-carriageway-say-port-operators/

As per our web page: 
We want a direct curve onto the Ayrshire coast railway and vice versa and a study into a new Solway Viaduct to bypass Carlisle for growing freight. 
The freight is growing and currently A75 is reaching a stage where expansion is being sought, when what is needed is a rail alternative parallel to the A75 to give more modal choices and modal shift to save Dumfries and Galloway from the corrosive impact of ever more road expansion, vehicle dependency cultures and rat runs.
Cairnryan is flexing its muscles as a premier sea port and so direct rail linkages into the port from A75 and other places is what is needed to give proper rail-based competition.
BRTA calls on the Scottish Government to kindly intervene and:
1. Demand for the former route of the Dumfries-Stranraer et al rail link, closed 1965 bitterly resisted by the people along its route; that the route be protected and deviation spaces or select new-build is given due consideration as to land use at a planning and national stewardship. Growth is not bad, but needs managing in a sustainable manner. The absence of rail is a glaring gap and impediment to fair competition and that of land use and the environment.
2. That it is 11th hour and timely for a proper full-blown feasibility study to be done into the business case, feasibility and engineering context of a reopened rail corridor including an arm to Kirkcudbright, where BRTA believes portal facilities could also be nurtured. 
3. BRTA intends to hold another meeting in Dumfries to bring more people together in 2026 and details will be published in due course on our website events page: https://brtarail.com/events/
4. Please write to your MP and MSP respectively as well as local councils to encourage looking at things away from piecemeal or parochial fashion and see the passenger and freight by rail benefits reopening the rail link offers.
5. Meanwhile, people can join BRTA or donate and help us grow our own Scottish Team. We welcome to liaise and work with others too and are encouraged others are stirring to reopen the rail link, which surely deserves protection and studies with a view to address the growing demand and absence of a rail solution. Thank you.


Friday, 21 November 2025

East-West Rail Northampton must have rails east too!

Addition 02-12-25:

re: https://www.northamptonchron.co.uk/news/politics/council/major-plans-unveiled-for-new-1700-home-housing-estate-as-extension-to-northampton-neighbourhood-5424920?utm_social_post_id=612041630&utm_social_handle_id=160851263979887 

This development has been speculated with others for a long time I recall? It will mean a lot more road traffic in the radial road areas it links to and from. Delays on deliveries are nothing new, it costs though and more of the same only exacerbates that. I know some do not challenge or get involved with planning matters but BRTA does sometimes. 
Although not on our supported Northampton-Bedford rail route literally, it adds a market demand for a new potential Brackmills area Park and Ride Railway Station on a reopened Northampton-Bedford rail link which could be a considerable benefit on and off the rails. Complications need to be studied, business cases need updating, but with Universal at Bedford, direct 50 minute direct rail access to Luton Airport and those audiences to the Northampton area by sustainable transport, one feels the view strongly that we would be foolish to let the rail aspiration go and bury heads in sands as to the opportunities lost if we do not act now and see the medium term choices now! 

Pragmatically in reopening local rail terms, it is an 11th hour, because junctioning and interim routing options, unless defined and studied, will vanish under these kinds of development proliferating on a nationwide basis! It is time to come together and determine a rail future for Northampton please! 

Useful web page: https://brtarail.com/b2n/
At the Bedford end, ensuring no development blocks access to East-West Rail's northern route from the Northampton direction and that Thameslink trains can enter Bedford en route southwards, does not appear in East-West Rail designs, Northampton will have no quick and direct rail access to Bedford or Cambridge unless a 1.5 hour deviation changing at Bletchley is your ideas of a panacea for travelling to Greater East Anglia, when a B2N direct rail inclusion would cut that time to Bedford down by at least half with Brackmills and a north of Olney Parkway being served on a modern railway?

Northampton is central to the heart of England. It is a major logistics centre. It has many well-attended sporting outlets (Rugby, Cricket, Football) as does Bedford (Rugby, Rowing and Athletics)! Northampton has a population growing upwards of a 250, 000 catchment. It will ultimately have access to the Milton Keynes/Bletchley to Oxford corridor and vice versa.

However 2 aspects need a consistent coalition to be built and take up the baton:
1. Northampton-Bedford/Cambridge synergies. Needs updated studies including business cases, engineering aspects, new route avoiding built-up Olney with a new Park and Ride Station for Brackmills and A428/A509 interfaces and access into existing rails and networks at both Northampton and Bedford ends. East-West Rail proposes a rail route North of Bedford to the East for Cambridge and wider East Anglia and those audiences to Bedford and onwards to Oxford and vice versa. Suitability for freight (revenue) is yet to be determined. Northampton currently will have no direct rail link to this Bedford-Cambridge rail line. It should! Northampton-Bedford would however, plug Northampton and the trajectory to the West Midlands direct to Bedford, Wixams new station for Universal Theme Park (courting 8-million people per year/opens 2031), Luton Airport, London St Pancras Eurostar and the wide South East Thameslink Rail Network and all those audiences to Northampton! What could it do (footfall and spend minus road traffic congestion and pollution?) and much more. It needs an updated study and new routing options determined. Then a coalition to bring key outlets and people together and move it towards both inclusion and delivery within a 10 year time-frame.
2. Northampton-Market Harborough for Leicester, East Midlands and beyond and those audiences to Northampton as well as a Cross Country rail route linking East Midlands say Nottingham, with Northampton, Milton Keynes Central, Bletchley for Oxford, Reading, Bristol and Cardiff and those audiences by rail, to Northampton, lifting congestion on the A43 for example and M1?
There surely must be something in it making it worth a study update and lobbying to get the government to demand designs for a new Bedford-Cambridge railway include a direct link from a Northampton to Bedford new rail link to onwards for Cambridge etc, ideally from day one?
That is what BRTA is seeking and is supporting. We welcome you to join us and help take the vision forward. Leadership and champions are called for please.
Thank you.

Yours sincerely,
Richard Pill

Wednesday, 12 November 2025

BRTA is saddened by recent developments regarding rail links east of Bedford.

24-11-25

Letter received by my BRTA Colleague, Mr Simon Barber regarding 1000 houses on lands west of Willington Bedford. Please have a perusal The full planning application is yet to be submitted and we want BRTA and its supporters to be read for it:

1. It doubles the size of Willington - physical and population-wise.
2. We want a rail link east of Bedford via St John's and this development blocks both the old railway and deviation lands to avoid encroachment at Willington, a pittance contrasting East-West Northern Rail Route at 60+ houses to be demolished.
3. Our route was studied by a Bedford Borough Council paid for study and found to be viable. It goes north of Blunham (new-build) to Tempsford north or south of Station Road (aptly named!) with physical links to the north-south main line for direct running south of Peterborough, East Bedfordshire and north of Stevenage to Bedford County Town and beyond via the Oxford Corridor and those audiences, yes to Cambridge and East Anglia, but so much more INCLUDING freight by rail. Think of the environmental, trade and other social boosts it could offer. If Lidlington on Bedford-Bletchley is to retain its station, how much more should Willington have a new station with development tailored, the railway bridged and development made to fit what is available, not block out our rail option call?
If you agree, please email planning@bedford.gov.uk in support of our rail option (original letter included). We will aim to notify of planning submission for objections and comment, even though as a layman one cannot get a direct telephone call to the Planning Department at Bedford Borough Council, it goes to Customer Services instead and personally, as a layman I find the Borough's website daunting and feel one is seeking a needle of information in  a haystack of superbally!
Please give us your support. If Northern Route flounders for any reason, a fall-back would seem prudent to keep options open. Likewise, freight by any and all rails at design concept would seem prudent as well for modal shift 'new' potential as well as easing capacity on existing lines into, across and out of London, which needs that capacity for London centric growth by rail.
Please peruse our website for further background and please make a donation to help us with our efforts. Thank you.




20-11-25:

Also: https://www.bedfordindependent.co.uk/east-west-rail-plan-promises-new-bedford-station-hospital-hub-and-universal-ready-line-as-leaders-warn-big-questions-remain/

Does this mean eradication of a handful of halts like Aspley Guise and Millbrook and the end of the shuttle, which served them, to make way for semi-fast end-to-end Oxford-Cambridge passenger services and what of freight?

re: https://www.bedfordtoday.co.uk/news/transport/east-west-rail-latest-updates-new-multi-storey-car-park-to-be-accessed-via-bedfords-ford-end-road-5407817

Moving faster now, but some saying it is the result of consultation when our route was not put before the public in 2019! Unless we get a champion and see off encroachment threats, this steam-roller push seems it. However, how do we bring Northampton into the frame for Northampton-Cambridge linkages and Tempsford Interchange with physical rails for main north-south running to and from Bedford and Cambridge respectively? If new station West of Cambridge is okay, why not Newton Longville 'Bletchley West'? It is a growing catchment, Winslow okay for itself and Buckingham, but too far out for MK urban areas proliferation. Likewise BRTA wants the Claydon Parkway Station and the Aylesbury rail link for South Bucks - Milton Keynes and Northampton synergies. 
No good waiting until 2050, it needs factoring in now by design, as 10 years hence, development will consume land needed for rail access and linkages? 
There's more, but we need a champion or two to get these matters better appreciated where it counts. Email ceo@brtarail.com to be on our loop.

Update 19-11-2025

re: https://www.constructionenquirer.com/2025/11/19/6-7bn-east-west-rail-plan-ramped-up-in-design-rethink/

Concerns are:
1.  Kimberley College and Village at Stewartby, 150 users per day, will they be jeopardised for merged Kempston Hardwick and abolition of Stewartby Halt. A solution can be found, but no champions or asking our views yet.
2. Tempsford Interchange Station - over or under A1 Black Cat Roundabout, under or over Great River Ouse, duck-under ECML and nil connective tracks for Peterborough, Stevenage and East Beds direct to Bedford or Cambridge = a missed connective opportunity for passenger and freight.
3. No plans for bolt-on/integration with a new arm to Northampton. 2003 LSMMMS Study by Government included Northampton-Cambridge and Atkins study 2017 showed it was a good deal on timings and potential usage as part of a modern railway plus the freight - Northampton is a chief logistic centre with very poor radial rail links.
4. Nothing on arms to Ipswich and Norwich.
5. Nothing on the Aylesbury rail link and 
6. Nothing on Bedford Midland...silent as night! Plans have been produced of design however, we know this because we know someone who has seen them.
7. Development of 1000 houses west of Willington brings the curtain down on our preferred route to Tempsford from Bedford. That locks-in the Northern Route. If not flexible and adaptable; that cuts out rails potential reaches and ranges and throws growth to the roads, with locked-in congestion and pollution bloating NHS waiting lists. 
Otherwise good as far as it goes, but a time-line would also be welcome, so we know whether bets on 7 or 10 years for ribbon cutting is realistic, meanwhile any post 2031 Oxford-Bedford and Universal demand growth will need baying at Bedford Midland = a crunch time of where to put it all and what gives, what takes. Our option is perfectly do-able, but requires champions, political will and route protection strategies. So far, no local politicians has come to our aid on it, which betrays Bedford in terms of reach, range and scope. A railway is better than no-railway, but emergent railway is an end game for many of us and what will be, will be for a very long time for successive generations!

BRTA is saddened by recent developments regarding rail links east of Bedford.

re: https://www.bedfordindependent.co.uk/major-development-submitted-for-1000-homes-at-bedford-river-valley-park/

The British Regional Transport Association (BRTA) is concerned that its preferred rail route east of Bedford is under threat and lacks any notable champions coming forward to advocate for it despite best efforts.


From 1995-2017 it was agreed a new Bedford-Cambridge railway would go east of Bedford via the former St John’s Station area on the course of old railway. Then in 2019 the consultation on routes, abandoned the previous consensus and did not include it in the list of options for the public to engage with. The public gave support for a Northern Route E, because of the wish to link with the principal Bedford Midland Railway Station and go north and out via a new constructed rail route to Tempsford and onwards to Cambridge. 


The reasons for the abandonment of the previous ‘old’ route were:

  1. The old route is built on at Blunham and Sandy

  2. The Officer for Road and Rail (ORR) stipulated no new or reopened rail links would be able to have Level Crossings and would need flyovers or duck-under bridges.

BRTA believes this should be challenged with special dispensations where no other enablement to reopening can be done unless a level crossing is provided.

Alas, despite campaigning over many years, no champions have arisen from MP’s to Mayors to other leaders, and that lack of champions has left the rail route vulnerable. 

Indeed, the Bedford Borough Council did a study looking at 3 rail routes going east of Bedford and found BRTA’s route was viable and do-able given the caveats required. However, drift has meant default to the Northern Route and now 1000 houses west of Willington, Bedford will scupper the former rail route and lock-in the Northern Route which wants at least 60 houses demolished for an extra two tracks north of Bedford and faces engineering and costly challenges getting through Black Cat Roundabout on the A1 and over the River Great Ouse at Tempsford before ducking under the main north-south main line at Tempsford to go on to Cambridge.


BRTA is disappointed, BRTA CEO Richard Pill said “we are sleep walking into the Northern Rail Route and that will mean upheaval and take 10 years to build whenever permission is granted. Meanwhile the Bedford Midland Railway Station will need more tracks and platform provisions and a new passenger booking hall. Given Oxford-Bedford trains are due 2031, waiting another 8 years for the Bedford-Tempsford-Cambridge railway to be built, means sidings at Bedford for Oxford trains will be needed. Add to which, Universal’s 8-million visitors per year from 2031, will mean things are extremely busy. BRTA is sad our route is not being supported despite our many appeals and congestion looks set to get worse for years to come.”

See also our web page: https://brtarail.com/ewrail/







Tuesday, 11 November 2025

Redhill Rail Reform - It could bring enormous benefits to passengers and more freight by rail too!

Redhill, is the key location on South East Railway Network, where ‘reform’ with investment, could bring dividends to all rail users and more freight by rail too!
The British Regional Transport Association (BRTA) wants reform of Redhill on and part of the Brighton Main Line, which has had numerous suggestions for capacity enhancement. Closures, locked-in road dependency, and growth, leaving existing lines struggling to cope with demand as people want to vote with their feet and use better public transport.
Our diagram above, done by our excellent member Iain Sear, shows the principles of our intent to speed access to principal places at Redhill for people and goods. It does not show every track that exists, it is simplified to try and convey an idea… what if?!
 
We call for:
1.    Third Rail Electrification of the North Downs Line to enable East Croydon-Guildford and Reading Thameslink network growth and wrap around. That releases diesel stock for deployment elsewhere.
2.    The flyover idea would enable Channel Tunnel-Oxford and beyond freight and passenger trains orbiting London and linking with principal places like Birmingham, freeing up capacity on existing lines.
3.    Tonbridge-Gatwick and Brighton direct, shaving time off changing at Redhill would enable more trains and reduce messing around, overcrowding and link Kent with Sussex by rail.
4.    BRTA calls for organisations to form a coalition, pool talent and resources and study these ideas, the benefits and time savings, freeing up paths and enabling transformation of the areas rail services.
5.    If you support our calls, please add your voice to our membership: https://brtarail.com/become-a-member/
6.    Other schemes over the recent decades have been numerous: Lewes-Uckfield, Brighton Main Line Mark 2, and a late comer is to abolish the Gatwick Express and amalgamate serving Gatwick Airport, a growth area, into existing services, with more of them. BRTA is not necessarily against these schemes and some like Lewes – Uckfield, we have flagged up many times, but they all seem to flounder on hitches sadly.
7.    Our suggestion of a flyover at Redhill has been around since the time of the 1955 British Railways Modernisation Plan, which was only partly implemented, intended to save the railways, instead, led preludatively to the mass closures with modernisation was more often than not being made out of economies, not government investment, which went on more roads, sadly. Getting congestion off the roads by improving rail links and access, is a top priority for BRTA and we invite the public to email their MP’s in support of what we are tabling here: https://members.parliament.uk/members/commons?sort=1
BRTA holds forums around the South East to bring people together, for recruitment purposes and to delegate roles and responsibilities to local people to roll up their sleeves and help usher the agendas along!

If you share the agenda, help bring it about. Time is running out and you can make a real difference! Watch this space for progress updates! E. info@brtarail.com

Wednesday, 5 November 2025

Colne-Skipton reopening of a local rail link needed!

re: https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/25593825.cross-party-support-restoration-skipton-colne-line/?utm_term=Autofeed&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1762259415

It has long awaited, and deserves a chance and the full go-ahead. Does the government want sustainable growth and local-regional regeneration? Then reopening this rail link is the way to go. BRTA supports it, our Northern Area Rep cc'd here, is also instrumentally gathering and giving support. Please add your voice by writing to your local MP: https://members.parliament.uk/members/commons?sort=1 and add your voice to SELRAP - the group leading on campaigning for the local rail reopening. It makes absolute sense and should be a top 10 of such reinstatements in the North with others similarly nationwide including Wales and Scotland too.
See: https://www.selrap.org.uk/ and our campaigns pages for other area lists too (East Anglia to be done shortly): https://brtarail.com/our-campaigns/
Up-to-date news can be posted on our Blogspot: 
https://brtarailvolunteer.blogspot.com/ If you want more on your area/region, join, do something, make news and campaign towards delivery!

Saturday, 25 October 2025

Land of my fathers! It is time for Welsh Rail Revival for the whole country staring with basics!

01-11-2025: Even more reasons to rebuild these strategic rail links in WALES! (and across the British Nations): 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp8ej07z328o.amp

26-10-25

https://www.cambrian-news.co.uk/news/cambrian-coast-evening-trains-from-pwllheli-to-machynlleth-retained-for-now-after-community-campaign-845199

Revive Wales' Rail Network starting with adequate capacity now!

re: https://www.cambrian-news.co.uk/news/plans-for-new-trains-on-cambrian-line-delayed-again-842982#comments 

BRTA is courting people to join BRTA and help us inform a team to highlight the issues and campaign to get not just improvements to existing lines like Cambrian Coast Railway, but the full restoration to modern rail standards of the full-blown West Wales North-South Main Line from Carmarthen-Bangor! If you agree, join BRTA and email Welsh Assembly, MP's and Media Outlets to give us support. 
See: https://brtarail.com/wales/ for our wider Welsh Rail Revival agenda... even if 50% is delivered over 10 years, it is worth it for a variety of good reasons - socially, economically, environmentally and morally! Join us now. Our free email loop for updates is available via ceo@brtarail.com

Monday, 20 October 2025

Horsham Forum: Developments abound, but where are the new rail links to soak up congestion and pollution?

Update 10-11-2025:

https://www.sussexexpress.co.uk/news/people/new-hitch-in-battle-to-reopen-disused-rail-lines-between-guildford-horsham-and-shoreham-5395203?cx_testId=1&cx_testVariant=cx_1&cx_artPos=1&cx_experienceId=EX1XA55IXI4V&cx_experienceActionId=showRecommendationsIB4K4GGSCTSZ8#cxrecs_s

08-11-2025 Calls for action!

See also our new South East Page: 

https://brtarail.com/southeast/

Development pressures abound across the South East, yet no new local rail infrastructure projects being rolled out by Government and agencies, councils and industry seem to roll-out rhetoric and blusterism, but translates to a lack of rail in all content beyond existing lines, which are busy and reaching capacity. BRTA wants the local network to grow more and reopenings, rebuildings and select new pieces of infrastructure, not roads, is how we retain land and open spaces and underpin development sustainably. Please email your MP and encourage support for our suggestions. Join BRTA/affiliate and help resource our endeavours to enable more, offer to volunteer too, helping us with delivery and ensuring the smooth and consistent operation of our advance for getting more rail and rail solutions. It is time to think big and consider new pieces of rail infrastructure like Polegate avoiding lines, like a direct Tonbridge-Gatwick curve and reinstating a new-build Guildford-Cranleigh-Horsham/Shoreham rail link to relieve the Brighton Main Line and enable more without recourse into London and out again or endless delays trying to get across the South East by rail. Add your voice, your MP's can be found here: 
Here's an example of what we face: 
https://www.sussexexpress.co.uk/news/people/worried-residents-raise-concerns-over-plans-for-1000-new-houses-in-southwater-5390268 It is a time to prepare for a 2026 action to bring development to provide the railways we need, or be halted! People need homes, but also to be free of congestion, blight and pollution. Enquiries welcome: info@brtarail.com

Update 07-11-25

Protect routes and ask councils to work up business cases: re: https://www.sussexexpress.co.uk/news/people/worried-residents-raise-concerns-over-plans-for-1000-new-houses-in-southwater-5390268 Email the County Council and relevant local authority calling for the rail corridor to be protected and a rail link made a top priority between Shoreham and Horsham. Call for a study making the case for the rail link. Email also, the port of Shoreham about what the rail link can offer.

I now attach a copy of the Minutes of our recent Horsham Forum.

  •    Horsham-Guildford -  We agreed that there is very high initial capital expenditure for that line.  Much of the old track-bed survives, and quite a portion of it is now the Downs Link; this would already give some protection of the track-bed - we feel that it can be slewed beside the railway being separated by appropriate fencing (including a hedge) to keep out children and trespassers accessing the railway. We also feel that the line should be re-opened following several new housing developments and population growth along the track-bed corridor and at the same time the increased population will increase road traffic which is already horrendous at times along the A281 Guildford - Horsham road. The re-opened railway would provide a direct link between Brighton and Guildford/Reading and potentially beyond.  We should get Councils and MPs on board, target green organisations/groups in Cranleigh, and also Onslow Estates,which will be via the Clandon Estates Office. The estate has a house at Knowle Park in Cranleigh 
  •    Horsham-Shoreham - This should be the second phase after Horsham-Guildford. There are local council offices on that line at Southwater, and bricklayer's pits in the vicinity. There must be a commercial case for that line.  We feel that the Christ's Hospital to Shoreham informing a joined-up Guildford-Brighton direct railway which could relieve the Brighton Main Line, offer more journey by rail opportunities and declutter urban areas, rural roads and free up parking capacity through more choice and options. Towns such as Oxford and Heathrow-Brighton via Guildford would draw in significant footfall and spend minus the volumes of traffic places without rail choices suffer be it daily movements or seasonal booms and slumps. The track-bed is again part of the Downs Link. 
  •     North Downs Line/Access to Gatwick Airport -  This should be a high priority since housing developments are taking place at Earlswood. There should be direct curves from both the Tonbridge (aka North Downs Line) to Gatwick and a study into a new flyover at Redhill linking Tonbridge and Guildford lines for passenger and freight to and from both Kent and the Channel Tunnel. Furthermore the North Downs Line will also bring capacity to the M25.
  •     Arundel Curve - This should be viable and also cheaper than Horsham (Christs Hospital) -Shoreham, and we now have to look at costings. We decided that the curve between the Mid-Sussex Line and Coastway Line would be at Barnham rather than Ford since it is close to HM Prison. Whenever the Brighton Main Line is shut for any reason the increase in rail traffic is significant on the Mid-Sussex Line.
  •    Midhurst-Chichester - To prevent road-building. 
  •    Chessington South-Epsom/Leatherhead - To prevent road-building. Furthermore there are new housing developments close to Epsom and Leatherhead.
  •    Other improvements, such as enabling a direct train from Heathrow to Gatwick.  Longer-term such a line could also link up via High Wycombe to East-West Rail. Overall, we discussed calling this the "R25" (like the motorway but rail). 
  •    We also discussed the merits of new stations on existing lines in the Guildford area - Merrow and Park Barn.

BRTA Horsham Forum 

Saturday 25 October 2025 at the Lynd Cross, 1 Springfield Road, Horsham, West Sussex RH12 2PG for 2pm lunch and 3-5pm business

Venue website: https://www.jdwetherspoon.com/pubs/the-lynd-cross-horsham/

Venue phone: 01403-272393


Main Convenor for BRTA is Simon Barber: admin@brtarail.com

Phone (landline): 020-8940-4399 Phone (mobile): 07522-374740

All welcome


1.Horsham – Guildford

2.Horsham -  Shoreham

3.North Downs Line

4.Access to Gatwick Airport

5.Arundel Curve 

6.   Petersfield - Midhurst – Chichester

7. Chessington South – Epsom/Leatherhead


Check our new web page for the South East:


Join BRTA and offer to help us make project and organisational progress.